Forest soil conservation in central Mexico: An interdisciplinary assessment

Catena

Volumn 104, Issue , 2013, Pages 280-287

  Cotler, Helena ^a   Cram, Silke ^b   Martinez Trinidad, Sergio ^b   Quintanar, Eduardo ^b  

^a Instituto Nacional de Ecologa   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Mexico; Public policy; Soil conservation; Soil indicators

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BULK DENSITY; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FOREST SOIL; HETEROGENEITY; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; PH; POLICY MAKING; SOIL CARBON; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL NITROGEN; SOIL QUALITY;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

EID: 84873179495     PISSN: 03418162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Anta S., Carabias J. Consecuencias de las políticas en el uso de los ecosistemas y la biodiversidad. Políticas Públicas y Perspectivas de Sustentabilidad 2008, vol. III:99. CONABIO, México.
2. Arnold R.W., Szabolcs I., Targulian V.O. Flobal soil change. Report of an IIASA-ISSS-UNEP Task Force on the role of soil in global change 1990, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, (51pp.).
3. Bernard B.B., Bernarg H., Brooks J.M. Determination of Total Carbon, Total Organic Carbon and Inorganic Carbon in Sediments (Online Cited fill in: Apr, 15, 2004). http://www.tdi-bi.com/analytical_services/environmental/NOAA_methods/TOC.pdf.
4. Bezdicek F.D., Papendick R.I., Lal R. Introduction: importance of soil quality to health and sustainable land management. Soil Science Society of America. Special Publication 1996, 49.
5. Bishop C., Shumway R., Wandschneider P. Agent heterogeneity in adoption of anaerobic digestion technology: integrating economic, diffusion and behavioral innovation theories. Land Economics 2010, 86(3):585-608.
6. Bone J., Head M., Barraclough D., Archer M., Scheib C., Flight D., Voulvoulis N. Soil quality assessment under emerging regulatory requirements. Environmental International 2010, 36:609-622.
7. Bouyoucous G.J. Directions for making mechanical analyses of soil by hydrometer meted. Soil Science 1963, 42:25-30.
8. Burger J.A., Kelting L.D. Using soil quality indicators to assess forest stand management. Forest Ecology and Management 1999, 122:155-166.
9. Campos A., Oleshko K., Etchevers J., Hidalgo C. Exploring the effects of changes in land use on soil quality on the Eastern slope of the Cofre de Perote Volcano (Mexico). Forest Ecology and Management 2007, 248:174-182.
10. Carter M.R., Gregorich E.G., Anderson J.W., Doran J.W., Janzen H.H., Pierce F.J. Concepts of soil quality and their significance. Soil Quality of Crop Production and Ecosystem Health 1997, Elsevier, Amsterdam. E.G. Gregorich, M.R. Carter (Eds.).
11. Chouinard H., Paterson T., Wandschneider P., Ohler A. Will farmers trade profits for stewardship? Heterogeneity motivations for farm practice selection. Land Economics 2008, 84(1):66-82.
12. CONAFOR Protección, restauración y conservación de suelo forestales. Manual de obras y prácticas 2006, (México, 298 pp. Available: http://www.conafor.gob.mx/portal/index.php/temas-forestales/suelos). Tercera edición.
13. CONAFOR ProÁrbol por Reglas de operación (1 Marzo 2012). http://www.conafor.gob.mx/portal/index.php/tramites-y-servicios/apoyos-2012.
14. Cotler H. Evolución y perspectivas de la conservación de suelos en México. Los grandes problemas de México: medio ambiente 2010, vol. IV. 141-164 pp., El Colegio de México, México, (439 pp.). J.L. Lezama, B. Graizbord (Eds.).
15. Cotler H., Sotelo E., Dominguez J., Zorrilla M., Cortinas S., Quiñones L. La conservación de suelos: un asunto de interés público. Gaceta Ecológica 2007, 83. (71 pp. http://www.ine.gob.mx/publicaciones/resultado.php).
16. De Graaff J. Evaluating incentive systems for soil and water conservation on the basis of case studies in four countries. Incentive in Soil Conservation: From Theory to Practice 1999, Science Publishers, Inc., Enfield. D.W. Sanders, P.C. Huszar, S. Sombatpanit, T. Enters (Eds.).
17. De Graaff J., Amsalu A., Bodnar F., Kessler A., Posthumus H., Tenge A. Factors influencing adoption and continued use of long-term soil and water conservation measures in five developing countries. Applied Geography 2008, 28:271-280.
18. De Graaff J., Kessler A., Olsen P. Farm-level adoption of soil and water conservation measures and policy implications in Europe. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:1-3 pp..
19. Ditzler C.A., Tugel A.J. Soil quality field tools: experiences of USDA-NRCS soil quality. Agronomy Journal 2002, 94:33-38.
20. Doran W.J., Parkin T.B. Quantitative indicators of soil quality: a minimum data set. Methods for Assessing Soil Quality 1996, 25-37. Soil Science Society of America Publication, Madison WI. W.J. Doran, A.J. Jones (Eds.).
21. Ervin C.A., Ervin D.E. Factors affecting the use of soil conservation practices: hypotheses, evidences and policy implications. Land Economics 1982, 58(3):277-292.
22. Feder G., Just R.E., Zilberman D. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 1985, 5:254-297.
23. Feinstein O. Use of evaluations and the evaluation of their use. SAGE Publications 2007, 8(4):433-439.
24. Geissen V., Wang S., Oostindie K., Huerta E., Zwart K.B., Ritsema C.J., Moore D. Effects of topsoil removal as a nature management technique on soil functions. Catena 2013, 101:50-55.
25. Green P.G., Heffernan D.W. Soil erosion and perception of the problem. Journal of Rural Studies 1987, 3(2):151-157.
26. Helin J., Haigh M.H. Better land husbandry in Honduras: towards the new paradigm in conserving soil, water and productivity. Land Degradation & Development 2002, 13:233-250.
27. Hudson N. A Study of the Reasons for Success or Failure of Soil Conservation Projects-FAO Soils Bulletin 64, Rome 1991.
28. ISRIC Procedures for soil analysis. Technical Paper No. 9 1992, International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen. 3a Edición. L.P. van Reeuwijk (Ed.).
29. Kimble M.J., Lal R. Watershed management for mitigating the greenhouse effects. Integrated Watershed Management in the Global Ecosystem 2000, 367-377. CRC Press, (395 pp.). R. Lal (Ed.).
30. Lal R. Soils and sustainable agriculture. A review Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2007, 28:57-64.
31. Lapar L.A., Pandey S. Adoption of soil conservation: the case of the Philippine uplands. Agricultural Economics 1999, 21:241-256.
32. Larson W.E., Pierce F.J. Conservation and enhancement of soil quality. IBSRAM Proc 12 (2) 1991, Vol 2:175-203. Int Board for Soil. Res. And Manage, Bangkok, Thailand.
33. Loch R.J. Soil conservation practice e - in search of effective solutions. ISCO 2004 - 13th, International Soil Conservation Organization Conference, Brisbane, Australia, July 2004 2004, (Paper 110, 6 pp.).
34. Lockeretz W. What have we learned about who conserves soil?. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1990, 45(5):517-523.
35. Lynne G.D., Shonkwiler J.S., Rola L.R. Attitudes and farmer conservation behavior. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1988, 70(1):12-19.
36. Magaña O. Evaluación externa de los apoyos de reforestación, obras y prácticas de conservación de suelos y sanidad forestal. Ejercicio Fiscal 2006 2007, Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo y Grupo GSP, (111 pp.).
37. Margoluis R., Stem C., Salafsky N., Brown M. Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation. Evaluation and Program Planning 2009, 32:138-147.
38. Maybery D., Crase L., Gulllifer C. Categorising farming values as economic conservation and lifestyle. Journal of Economic Psychology 2005, 26:59-72.
39. Mbaga-Semgolawe Z., Folmer H. Household adoption behaviour of improved soil conservation: the case of the North Pare and west Usambara Mountains of Tanzania. Land Use Policy 2000, 17:321-336.
40. Merino M. Los programas de subsidios al campo. Las razones y las sinrazones de una política mal diseñada 2009, División de Administración Pública. Centro de Investigaciones y Docencia Económica, México, (Número 229).
41. Neill S.P., Lee R.D. Explaining the adoption and disadoption of sustainable agriculture: the case of cover crops in northern Honduras. Economic Development and Cultural Change 2001, 49:793-820.
42. Nowak J.P., Cabot E.P. The human dimension of resource management programs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2004, 59(6):128-135.
43. Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 2009, 325:419-422.
44. Pearce D. Environmentally harmful subsidies: barriers to sustainable development. OECD Workshop on Environmentally Harmful Subsidies 2002, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, (18 pp.).
45. Powers R.F., Tiarks A.E., Boyle J.R. Assessing soil quality: practicable standards for sustainable forest productivity in the United States. Soil Science Society of America. Special Publication 1998, 53:53-80. M.B. Adams, K. Ramakrishna, E.A. Davidson (Eds.).
46. Pretty J. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 2003, 302:1912-1914.
47. Ryan R., Erickson D., De Young E. "Producers" motivations for adopting conservation practices along riparian zones in a midwestern agricultural watershed. Journal of Environment Planning and Management 2003, 36(1):19-37.
48. Salafsky N., Margoluis R., Redford K. Adaptative Management: A Tool for Conservation Practitioners 2001, Biodiversity Support Program, Washington D.C., (Disponible en: www.BSPonline.org).
49. Sattler C., Nagel J.U. Factors affecting farmers' acceptance of conservation measures-a case study from north-eastern Germany. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:70-77.
50. Sautter A.J., Ovchinnikova N., Kruse C., Lynne G. Farmers' decisions regarding carbon sequestration: a metaeconomic view. Society & Natural Resources: An international Journal 2011, 24(2):133-147.
51. Schoenholtz S.H., Van Miegroet H., Burger J.A. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management 2000, 138:335-356.
52. SEMARNAT-Colegio de Posgraduado 2002. Evaluación de la degradación del suelo causada por el hombre en la República Mexicana, escala 1:250,000. Memoria Nacional, SEMARNAT-Colegio de Posgraduados, 58p.
53. Seybold C.A., Mausbach M.J., Karlen D.L., Rogers H.H. Quantification of soil quality. Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle 1998, CRC Press, USA. R. Lal, B.A. Stewart (Eds.).
54. Sheeder J.R., Lynne D.G. Empathy-conditioned conservation: "walking in the shoes of others" as a conservation farmer. Land Economics 2011, 87(3):433-452.
55. Showers B.K. Soil erosion and conservation: an international history and a cautionary tale. Footprints in the Soil. People and Ideas in Soil History 2006, 369-406. Elsevier. P.B. Warkentin (Ed.).
56. Simonian L. La defensa de la tierra del jaguar. Secretaria de medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca, Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Instituto Mexicano de Recursos Naturales Renovables 1999.
57. Taylor E.J., Stamoulis Kostas.G. Migration: new dimensions and characteristics, causes, consequences and implications for rural poverty. Food, Agriculture and Rural Development 2001, FAO.
58. Traoré N., Landry R., Amara N. On-farm adoption of conservation practices: the role of farm and farmers characteristics perceptions and health hazards. Land Economics 1998, 74(1):114-127.
59. Vargas P.A. Informe de evaluación externade los apoyos de restauración de suelos forestales, Ejercicio Fiscal 2009 2010, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Centro de Educación Continua, SEMARNAT, CONAFOR, (160 pp.).
60. Vásquez A.V. La conservación del suelo y agua en México 1986, DGNA-SARH, México, (37 pp.).
61. Vélez F., Meléndez A., García H. Algunas consideraciones de política agropecuaria143-170 pp. Políticas públicas para un crecimiento incluyente 2007, Universidad Iberoamericana, México, (392pp.). P. Cotler (Ed.).
62. Whyte A. Guidelines for field studies in environmental perception. MAB Technical Notes 5 1985, UNESCO, Paris, (117pp.).
63. WOCAT Where the Land Is Greener: Case Studies and Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Initiatives Worldwide 2007, CTA-FAO-UNEP-CDE, (364pp.). H. Liniger, W. Critchley (Eds.).