The EU Decarbonisation Roadmap 2050-What way to walk?

Energy Policy

Volumn 55, Issue , 2013, Pages 190-207

  Hübler, Michael ^a   Löschel, Andreas ^a,b  

^a CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Copenhagen Pledges; EU; Roadmap 2050

Indexed keywords

ACTION SCENARIOS; ADDITIONAL COSTS; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM; COPENHAGEN; EMISSIONS TRADING; EQUALISATION; EU POLICY; EXTENDED FORM; GLOBAL CLIMATES; IF THERE ARE; INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS; POLICY DESIGN; POLICY OPTIONS; ROADMAP;

COMPETITION; EMISSION CONTROL; EUROPIUM;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; COMPETITIVENESS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; EUROPEAN UNION; GLOBAL CLIMATE; GLOBALIZATION; MACROECONOMICS; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; PRICE DYNAMICS;

EID: 84873147154     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.054     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alexeeva-Talebi, V., Böhringer, C., Löschel, A., Voigt, S. (2012). The Value-Added of Sectoral Disaggregation: Implications on Competitive Consequences of Climate Change Policies. The Role of Border Carbon Adjustment in Unilateral Climate Policy: Results from EMF 29, Energy Economics 34, 127-142.
2. Armington, P. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers, Washington, DC, USA, vol. 16, pp. 159-178.
3. Babiker M.H., Rutherford T.F. The economic effects of border measures in subglobal climate agreements. The Energy Journal 2005, 26(4):99-126.
4. Badri N., Walmsley T. The GTAP 7 Data Base 2008, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, accessed 08/2011).
5. Balassa B. Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 1965, 33:99-123.
6. Balistreri E.J., Hillberry R.H., Rutherford T.F. Structural estimation and solution of international trade models with heterogeneous firms. Journal of International Economics 2011, 83:95-108.
7. Böhringer, C. and A. Lange (2003). Efficiency, compensation, and discrimination: what is at stake when implementing the EU emissions trading scheme? ZEW Discussion Paper No. 03-73, Mannheim, Germany.
8. Böhringer C., Löschel A. Climate policy beyond Kyoto: Quo Vadis? A computable general equlibrium analysis based on expert judgements. Kyklos 2005, 58(4):467-493.
9. Böhringer C., Löschel A. Promoting renewable energy in Europe: a hybrid computable general equilibrium approach. the hybrid modelling: new answers to old challenges. The Energy Journal 2006, 123-138.
10. Böhringer C., Rutherford T.F. Combining bottom-up and top-down. Energy Economics 2008, 30:574-596.
11. Böhringer C., Löschel A., Moslener U., Rutherford T.F. EU climate policy up to 2020: an economic impact assessment. Energy Economics 2009, 31(2):295-305.
12. Böhringer C., Rutherford T.F., Tol R.S.J. THE EU 20/20/2020 targets: an overview of the EMF22 assessment. Energy Economics 2009, 31:268-273.
13. Böhringer C., Fischer C., Rosendahl K.E. The global effects of subglobal climate policies. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 2010, 10(2):13.
14. Böhringer, C., Balistreri, E. J. and Rutherford, T.F. (2012). The Role of Border Carbon Adjustment in Unilateral Climate Policy: Overview of an Energy Modeling Forum Study (EMF29). Energy Economics 34, 97-110.
15. Böhringer, C. and V. Alexeeva-Talebi (forthcoming). Unilateral climate policy and competitiveness: economic implications of differential emission pricing. The World Economy.
16. Bosetti V., Carraro C., Massetti E., Tavoni M. International energy R\&D spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization. Energy Economics 2008, 30(6):2912-2929.
17. Brooke A., Kendrick D., Meeraus A. GAMS: A User's Guide. Tutorial by R. Rosenthal 2010, GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC, USA, (accessed 08/2011).
18. Dirkse S., Ferris M. The PATH solver: a non-monotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems. Optimization Methods and Software 1995, 5:123-156.
19. Edenhofer O., Knopf B., Leimbach M., Bauer N. ADAM Modeling Comparison Project. the economics of low stabilization. The Energy Journal 2010, 31. (Special Issue 1).
20. Edwards T.H., Hutton J.P. Allocation of carbon permits within a country: a general equilibrium analysis of the United Kingdom. Energy Economics 2001, 23(4):371-386.
21. EU (2007). EU Energy Policy Data. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium. (accessed 09/2011). http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy_policy/doc/02_eu_energy_policy_data_en.pdf.
22. EU (2009a). EU Energy Trends to 2030. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium. (accessed 08/2011). http://ec.europa.eu/energy/observatory/trends_2030/index_en.htm.
23. EU (2009b). Commission Decision of 24 December 2009 determining, pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, a list of sectors and subsectors which are deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage. Document C(2009) 10251, Brussels, Belgium, (accessed 08/2011). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:001:0010:0018:EN:PDF.
24. EU (2011). Roadmap for moving to a low-carbon economy in 2050. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium. Short version: (accessed 08/2011). http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/roadmap/index_en.htm.
25. Eurostat (2009). European economic indicators. Statistical Offices of the European Union, Luxembourg, (accessed 01/2009). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home.
26. GCI (1990). Contraction and Convergence (C&C) is the science-based, global climate policy framework proposed to the UN since 1990 by the Global Commons Institute. (accessed 12/2011). http://www.gci.org.uk/.
27. Graichen, V., S. Healy, H. Hermann, K. Schumacher, A. Löschel, V. Alexeeva-Talebi, H. Kremers and S. Voigt (2010). Sectoral Approaches to fostering international action on climate change. Öko-Institut and ZEW, Berlin and Mannheim, Germany (available upon request).
28. Helpman, E., M.J. Melitz, S.R. Yeaple (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. The American Economic Review 94 (1), 300-316.
29. Horridge M. SplitCom: Programs to disaggregate a GTAP sector. Centre of Policy Studies 2005, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
30. Hübler M. Technology diffusion under contraction and convergence: a CGE analysis of China. Energy Economics 2011, 33(1):131-142.
31. Hübler, M. and A. Löschel (2012). The EU Decarbonisation Roadmap 2050-What Way to Walk? ZEW Discussion Paper No. 12-055, Mannheim, Germany, (accessed 10/2012). http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp12055.pdf.
32. Hübler, M., Baumstark, L., Leimbach, M., Edenhofer, O., Bauer, N. (2012). An Integrated Assessment Model with Endogenous Growth. Ecological Economics 83, 118-131.
33. IEA (2010). Cement Technology Roadmap 2009-Carbon Emissions Reductions up to 2050. Paris, France, 〈〉 (accessed 12/2012). http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Cement_Roadmap_Foldout_WEB.pdf.
34. IEO (2008/2010). International Energy Outlook. EIA, US Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, USA. (accessed 08/2011). Detailed tables of the 2011 version: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/ieo_tables.cfm (accessed 10/2011). http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/.
35. 2 permits: a general equilibrium analysis of policy instruments. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2000, 40(2):111-136.
36. Klepper G., Peterson S. Emissions trading, CDM, JI, and more: the climate strategy of the EU. The Energy Journal 2006, 27(2):1-26.
37. Leimbach M., Bauer N., Baumstark L., Edenhofer O. Mitigation costs in a globalized world: climate policy analysis with REMIND-R. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2010, 15:155-173.
38. Löschel, A., C. Böhringer, V. Alexeeva-Talebi, J. Kremers and S. Voigt (2009). Broadening the Scope of the Analysis of the Possible Risk of Carbon Leakage Induced by the Third Revision of the Emission Trading Scheme on Energy Intensive Industries. ZEW, Mannheim, Germany (available upon request).
39. Okagawa, A. and K. Ban (2008). Estimation of Substitution Elasticities for CGE Models. Osaka University, Discussion Paper 08-16, 〈〉 (accessed 12/2012). http://www2.econ.osaka-u.ac.jp/library/global/dp/0816.pdf.
40. Otto V.M., Löschel A., Reilly J. Directed technical change and differentiated climate policy. Energy Economics 2008, 30(6):2855-2878.
41. Paltsev, S., J.M. Reilly, H.D. Jacoby, R.S. Eckaus, J. McFarland, M. Sarofim, M. Asadoorian and M. Babiker (2005). The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4. The MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge MA, USA, 78 pp.
42. Popp D. ENTICE: endogenous technological change in the DICE model of global warming. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2004, 48:742-768.
43. Reichel R. Ökonomische Theorie der internationalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit von Volkswirtschaften 2002, Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany.
44. Rutherford T.F. Applied general equilibrium modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS subsystem: an overview of the modeling framework and syntax. Computational Economics 1999, 14:1-46.
45. Saito M. Armington elasticities in intermediate inputs trade: a problem in using multilateral trade data. Canadian Journal of Economics 2004, 37(4):1097-1117.
46. Stern, N. (2006). Review on Climate Change. HM Treasury, London, UK, (accessed 11/2011). http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/stern_review_report.htm.
47. UN (2009a). United Nations Industrial Commodity Statistics Database. USA, (accessed 08/2011). http://data.un.org/Browse.aspx?d=ICS.
48. UN (2009b). United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database. USA, (accessed 08/2011). http://comtrade.un.org/.
49. Weitzel, M., Hübler, M., Peterson, S. (2012). Fair, Optimal or Detrimental? Environmental vs. Strategic Use of Border Carbon Adjustment, The Role of Border Carbon Adjustment in Unilateral Climate Policy: Results from EMF 29, Energy Economics 34 (2), 198-207.