The global effects of subglobal climate policies

B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Boehringer, Christoph ^a   Fischer, Carolyn ^b   Rosendahl, Knut Einar ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^b RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

^c STATISTICS NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

border carbon adjustments; cap and trade; emissions leakage; general equilibrium model; output based allocation

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650880632     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19351682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.2583     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Armington, P.S. 1969. A Theory of Demand for Producers Distinguished by Place of Production. IMF Staff Papers 16(1): 159-78.
2. Aune, F.R., R. Golombek, S.A.C. Kittelsen, and K.E. Rosendahl. 2008. Liberalizing European Energy Markets: An Economic Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
3. Babiker, M.H. 2005. Climate Change Policy, Market Structure, and Carbon Leakage. Journal of International Economics 65(2): 421-45.
4. Babiker, M.H. and T.F. Rutherford. 2005. The Economic Effects of Border Measures in Subglobal Climate Agreements. Energy Journal 26(4): 99-126.
5. Badri, N.G., and T.L. Walmsley. 2008. Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 7 Data Base. West Lafayette, Indiana: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.
6. Bagwati, J., and P.C. Mavroidis. 2007. Is Action against U.S. Exports for Failure to Sign Kyoto Protocol WTO-Legal? World Trade Review 6: 299-310.
7. Biermann, F., and R. Brohm. 2005. Implementing the Kyoto Protocol Without the United States: The Strategic Role of Energy Tax Adjustments at the Border, Global Governance. Climate Policy 4: 289-302.
8. Böhringer, C., and A. Lange. 2005. On the Design of Optimal Grandfathering Schemes for Emission Allowances. European Economic Review 49: 2041-55.
9. Böhringer, C., and T.F. Rutherford. 2010. The Costs of Compliance: A CGE Assessment of Canada's Policy Options under the Kyoto Protocol. World Economy 33(2): 177-211.
10. 2 Abatement Strategies for the European Union. In Climate Change, Transport and Environmental Policy, edited by J.B. Braden and S. Proost. Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, 16-47.
11. 2 Emissions and Unilateral Action: Policy Implications of Induced Trade Effects. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 11(1-4): 18-22.
12. Böhringer, C., T.F. Rutherford, and W. Wiegard. 2003. Computable General Equilibrium Analysis: Opening a Black Box. ZEW Discussion Paper 03-56. Mannheim: Center for European Economic Research.
13. Burniaux, J., and J.O. Martins. 2000. Carbon Emission Leakages: A General Equilibrium View. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 242. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/410535403555.
14. Burniaux, J.-M., J. Chateau, R. Dellink, R. Duval, and S. Jamet. 2009. The Economics of Climate Change Mitigation: How to Build the Necessary Global Action in a Cost-Effective Manner. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 201. OECD Publishing.
15. de Cendra, J. 2006. Can Emissions Trading Schemes Be Coupled with Border Tax Adjustments? An Analysis vis-à-vis WTO Law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law (RECIEL) 15(2): 131- 145. ISSN 0962 8797.
16. Charnovitz, S., G.C. Hufbauer, and J. Kim. 2009. Global Warming and the World Trading System. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
17. 2 Abatement, Competitiveness and Leakage in the European Cement Industry under the EU ETS: Grandfathering versus Output-Based Allocation. Climate Policy 6(1): 93-113.
18. Demailly, D., and P. Quirion. 2008a. European Emission Trading Scheme and Competitiveness: A Case Study on the Iron and Steel Industry. Energy Economics 30(4): 2009-27.
19. Fischer, C. 2001. Rebating Environmental Policy Revenues: Output-Based Allocations and Tradable Performance Standards. Discussion Paper 01-22. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
20. Fischer, C., and A.K. Fox. 2007. Output-Based Allocation of Emissions Permits for Mitigating Tax and Trade Interactions. Land Economics 83: 575-99.
21. Fischer, C., and A.K. Fox. 2009. Combining Rebates with Carbon Taxes: Optimal Strategies for Coping with Emissions Leakage and Tax Interactions. RFF Discussion Paper 09-12. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
22. 2 in the Iron and Steel Industry: An Analysis of Japanese Emission Reduction Potentials. Energy Policy 30: 849-63.
23. Godard, O. 2007. Unilateral European Post-Kyoto Climate Policy and Economic Adjustment at EU Borders. EDF-Ecole Polytechnique: Cahier No. DDX 07-15.
24. Grubb, M., and K. Neuhoff. 2006. Allocation and Competitiveness in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Policy Overview. Climate Policy 6(1): 7-30.
25. Ho, M., R.D. Morgenstern, and J.-S. Shih. 2008. Impact of Carbon Price Policies on U.S. Industry. Discussion Paper 08-37. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
26. Houser, T., R. Bradley, B. Childs, J. Werksman, and R. Heilmayr. 2008. Leveling the Carbon Playing Field: International Competition and U.S. Climate Policy Design. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics and World Resources Institute.
27. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD). 2008. Climate Change: Schwab Opposes Potential Trade Measures. Bridges Trade BioRes 8(4): March 7.
28. Karp, L.S., and J. Zhao. 2008. A Proposal for the Design of the Successor to the Kyoto Protocol. Discussion Paper 2008-03. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements. September.
29. Kommerskollegium. 2004. Climate and Trade Rules: Harmony or Conflict? Stockholm: National Board of Trade.
30. Mattoo, A., A. Subramanian, D. Van der Mensbrugghe, and J. He. 2009. Reconciling Climate Change and Trade Policy. Policy Research Working Paper 5123 (November 1). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
31. Paltsev, S. 2001. The Kyoto Protocol: Regional and Sectoral Contributions to the Carbon Leakage. Energy Journal 22(4): 53-79.
32. Pauwelyn, J. 2007. U.S. Federal Climate Policy and Competitiveness Concerns: The Limits and Options of International Trade Law. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions. Working Paper 07-02. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University.
33. Peterson, E.B., and J. Schleich. 2007. Economic and Environmental Effects of Border Tax Adjustments. Sustainability and Innovation Working Paper S1/2007. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research.
34. Ponssard, J.P., and N. Walker. 2008. EU Emissions Trading and the Cement Sector: A Spatial Competition Analysis. Manuscript. Paris: Laboratoire d'Économétrie, CNRS et École Polytechnique.