Adaptive rehabilitation games

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 182-189

  Barzilay, Ouriel ^a   Wolf, Alon ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Adaptive systems; Artificial neural network; Electromyography; Neuromuscular rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE; BIOMECHANICS; COGNITIVE REHABILITATION; ELECTROMYOGRAM; EXERCISE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE TRAINING; NEUROMUSCULAR FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

HUMANS; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; NEUROFEEDBACK; SOFTWARE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 84873137538     PISSN: 10506411     EISSN: 18735711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barzilay O, Wolf A. An adaptive virtual system for neuromuscular rehabilitation. In: IFMBE Proc. world congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering, munich, Germany, vol. 25. no. 4; 2009. p. 1291-94.
2. Barzilay O., Wolf A. A fast implementation for EMG signal linear envelope computation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2011, 21(4):678-682.
3. Bryanton C., Bossé J., Brien M., McLean J., McCormick A., Sveistrup H. Feasibility, motivation, and selective motor control: virtual reality compared to conventional home exercise in children with cerebral palsy. CyberPsychol Behav 2006, 9:123-128.
4. Goldberg S. Training dismounted soldiers in a distributed interactive virtual environment. U.S. Army Research Institute Newsletter 1994, 14:9-12.
5. Holden M.K. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. CyberPsychol Behav 2005, 8(3):187-211.
6. Holden M.K., Dyar T. Virtual environment training: a new tool for neurorehabilitation. Neurol Rep 2002, 26:62-71.
7. Holden M.K., Todorov E., Callahan J., Bizzi E. Virtual environment training improves motor performance in two patients with stroke: case report. Neurol Rep 1999, 23:57-67.
8. Karniel A., Meir R., Inbar G.F. Best estimated inverse versus inverse of the best estimator. Neural Networks 2001, 14:1153-1159.
9. Kawato M. Computational schemes and neural network models for formulation and control of multijoint arm trajectories. Neural networks for control 1990, MIT press. W.T. Miller, R.S. Sutton, P.J. Werbos (Eds.).
10. Krakauer J.W. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006, 19:84-90.
11. Maclean N., Pound P., Wolfe C., Rudd A. A qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation. BMJ 2000, 321:1051-1054.
12. Nudo R., Milliken G.W. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys". J Neurophys 1996, 75:2144-2149.
13. Pollard N, Hodgins J, Riley M, Atkeson C. Adapting human motion for the control of a humanoid robot. In: IEEE proc. internat. conf. robotics and automation, Washington, DC, May; 2002. p. 1390-97.
14. Rose FD, Atree EA, Brooks BM, et al. Transfer of training from virtual to real environments. Presented at the 2nd European Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, Skovde, Sweden; 1998.
15. Stanney K.M., Kennedy R.S., Drexler J.M., Harm D.L. Motion sickness and proprioceptive after effects following virtual environment exposure. Appl Ergon 1999, 30:27-38.
16. Theasby P.J. The virtues of virtual reality. GEC Rev 1992, 1992(7):131-145.
17. Wren CR, Pentland AP. Dynamic models of human motion. In: Proc. internat. conf. automatic face and gesture recognition, Nara, Japan, 14-16; April 1998. p. 22-7.