Mismatch Negativity (MMN) to successive deviants within one hierarchically structured auditory object

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-7

  Jacobsen, Thomas Konstantin ^a   Steinberg, Johanna ^a,c   Truckenbrodt, Hubert ^b   Jacobsen, Thomas ^a  

^a HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Centre for General Linguistics ZAS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Event related potentials (ERP); Long term memory; Mismatch Negativity (MMN); Speech processing; Successive deviants

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PHONEME; PHONETICS; SPEECH;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873131932     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. American Encephalographic Society Guideline thirteen: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1994, 11:111-113.
2. Bendixen A., SanMiguel I., Schröger E. Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: a review. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2012, 83:120-131.
3. Blevins J. The syllable in phonological theory. The Handbook of Phonological Theory 1995, 206-244. Blackwell, Cambridge MA. J.A. Goldsmith (Ed.).
4. Boersma P., Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.0.35) [computer program] Retrieved September 23, 2008, from. http://www.praat.org/.
5. Bregman A. Auditory Scene Analysis 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge MA. 1st edn.
6. Eulitz C., Lahiri A. Neurobiological evidence for abstract phonological representations in the mental lexicon during speech recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(4):577-583.
7. Fudge E.C. Syllables. Journal of Linguistics 1969, 5:253-286.
8. Gordon M., Barthmaier P., Sands K. A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2002, 32:141-174.
9. Halle M., Vergnaud J.-R. Three-dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1980, 1:83-105.
10. Horvath J., Czigler I., Winkler I., Teder-Sälejärvi W. The temporal window of integration in elderly and young adults. Neurobiology of Aging 2007, 28:964-975.
11. Jacobsen T., Schröger E., Alter K. Pre-attentive perception of vowel phonemes from variable speech stimuli. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:654-659.
12. Johnson K. Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics 2002, Blackwell, Oxford. 2nd edn.
13. Jongman A., Wayland R., Wong S. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 108:1252-1263.
14. Kirmse U., Ylinen S., Tervaniemi M., Vainio M., Schröger E., Jacobsen T. Modulation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) to vowel duration changes in native speakers of Finnish and German as a result of language experience. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2008, 67:131-143.
15. Müller D., Schröger E. Temporal grouping affects the automatic processing of deviant sounds. Biological Psychology 2007, 74:358-364.
16. Müller D., Widmann A., Schröger E. Deviance-repetition effects as a function of stimulus feature, feature value variation, and timing: a mismatch negativity study. Biological Psychology 2005, 68:1-14.
17. Müller D., Widmann A., Schröger E. Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:668-676.
18. Näätänen R., Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125(6):826-859.
19. Näätänen R., Gaillard A., Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica 1978, 42:313-329.
20. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:2544-2590.
21. Näätänen R., Kujala T., Winkler I. Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:4-22.
22. Nousak J., Deacon D., Ritter W., Vaughan H. Storage of information in transient auditory memory. Cognitive Brain Research 1996, 4:305-317.
23. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
24. Paavilainen P., Valppu S., Näätänen R. The additivity of the auditory feature analysis in the human brain as indexed by the mismatch negativity: 1+1≈2 but 1+1+1<3. Neuroscience Letters 2001, 301:179-182.
25. Sams M., Alho K., Näätänen R. Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology 1984, 21:434-441.
26. Schröger E. Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1998, 30:131-145.
27. Selkirk E.O. Syllables. The Structure of Phonological Representations 1982, vol. 2:337-383. Foris, Dordrecht.
28. Steinberg J., Truckenbrodt H., Jacobsen T. Preattentive phonotactic processing as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:2174-2185.
29. Steinberg J., Truckenbrodt H., Jacobsen T. Activation and application of an obligatory phonotactic constraint in German during automatic speech processing is revealed by human event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2010, 77:13-20.
30. Sussman E., Winkler I., Ritter W., Alho K., Näätänen R. Temporal integration of auditory stimulus deviance as reflected by the mismatch negativity. Neuroscience Letters 1999, 264:161-164.
31. Sussman E., Kujala T., Halmetoja J., Lyytinen H., Alku P., Näätänen R. Automatic and controlled processing of acoustic and phonetic contrasts. Hearing Research 2004, 190:128-140.
32. Takegata R., Paavilainen P., Näätänen R., Winkler I. Independent processing of changes in auditory single features and feature conjunctions in humans as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroscience Letters 1999, 266:109-112.
33. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 21:147-163.
34. Wolff C., Schröger E. Human pre-attentive auditory change-detection with single, double, and triple deviations as revealed by mismatch negativity additivity. Neuroscience Letters 2001, 311:37-40.
35. World Medical Association World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects 2008, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf (last viewed May 14, 2012).
36. Yabe H., Tervaniemi M., Reinikainen K., Näätänen R. Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission. Neuroreport 1997, 8:1971-1974.
37. Zec D. The Syllable. The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology 2007, 161-194. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P. de Lacy (Ed.).