The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 93-99

  Dumbleton, Kathy ^a   Woods, Craig A ^b   Jones, Lyndon W ^a   Fonn, Desmond ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Compliance; Contact lenses; Daily disposable; Discontinuation; Dropout; Lapsed; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

ADULT; ALLERGY; CANADA; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTACT LENS; COST; DRY EYE; EYE DISCOMFORT; EYE INFECTION; EYE REDNESS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; LASER SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL NETWORK; TIME; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CANADA; CONTACT LENSES; DRY EYE SYNDROMES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873093450     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: 1542233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318271caf4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Weed K, Fonn D, Potvin R. Discontinuation of contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:140.
2. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999;26:157-162.
3. Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, et al. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea 2007;26: 168-174.
4. Briggs S. Profile of contact lens failures in Saudi Arabia. Clin Exp Optom 1996;79:255-259.
5. Schlanger JL. A study of contact lens failures. J Am Optom Assoc 1993;64: 220-224.
6. Young G, Veys J, Pritchard N, et al. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22:516-527.
7. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG. International contact lens prescribing in 2011. Contact Lens Spectrum 2012;27:26-31.
8. Efron N, Morgan PB, Helland M, et al. Daily disposable contact lens prescribing around the world. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010;33:225-227.
9. Fonn D, MacDonald KE, Richter D, et al. The ocular response to extended wear of a high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens. Clin Exp Optom 2002;85: 176-182.
10. Covey M, Sweeney DF, Terry R, et al. Hypoxic effects on the anterior eye of high-Dk soft contact lens wearers are negligible. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78: 95-99.
11. Papas EB, Vajdic CM, Austen R, et al. High-oxygen-transmissibility soft contact lenses do not induce limbal hyperaemia. Curr Eye Res 1997;16: 942-948.
12. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, et al. Changes in myopic refractive error with nine months' extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:845-849.
13. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, et al. Vascular response to extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:147-151.
14. Dumbleton K, Keir N, Moezzi A, et al. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:758-768.
15. Dumbleton KA, Woods CA, Jones LW, et al. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:215-223.
16. Aakre BM, Ystenaes AE, Doughty MJ, et al. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004;24:130-141.
17. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:281-286.
18. Young G, Riley CM, Chalmers RL, et al. Hydrogel lens comfort in challenging environments and the effect of refitting with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:302-308.
19. Alvord L, Court J, Davis T, et al. Oxygen permeability of a new type of high Dk soft contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:30-36.
20. Bergenske P, Long B, Dillehay S, et al. Long-term clinical results: 3 years of up to 30-night continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel and daily wear of low-Dk/t hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:74-80.
21. Brennan NA, Coles ML, Connor HR, et al. A 12-month prospective clinical trial of comfilcon A silicone-hydrogel contact lenses worn on a 30-day continuous wear basis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:108-118.
22. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, et al. The incidence of contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1655-1662.
23. Dart JK, Radford CF, Minassian D, et al. Risk factors for microbial keratitis with contemporary contact lenses: a case-control study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1647-1654.
24. Hayes VY, Schnider CM, Veys J. An evaluation of 1-day disposable contact lens wear in a population of allergy sufferers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2003: 26:85-93.
25. Wolffsohn JS, Emberlin JC. Role of contact lenses in relieving ocular allergy. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2011;34:169-172.
26. Grant T, Chong M, Holden B. Management of GPC with daily disposable lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1988;65:94.
27. Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA, et al. Comparison of adverse events with daily disposable hydrogels and spectacle wear: results from a 12-month prospective clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2327-2334.
28. Fahmy M, Long B, Giles T, et al. Comfort-enhanced daily disposable contact lens reduces symptoms among weekly/monthly wear patients. Eye Contact Lens 2010;36:215-219.
29. Wolffsohn JS, Hunt OA, Chowdhury A. Objective clinical performance of 'comfort-enhanced' daily disposable soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010;33:88-92.
30. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG. International contact lens prescribing in 2010. Contact Lens Spectrum 2011;26:30-35.
31. Fogel J, Zidile C. Contact lenses purchased over the internet place individuals potentially at risk for harmful eye care practices. Optometry 2008;79:23-35.
32. Dumbleton KA, Woods M, Woods CA, et al. Ability of patients to recall habitual contact lens products and enhancement of recall using photographic aids. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2011;34:236-240.
33. Dillehay SM, Miller MB. Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:272-277.
34. Woods J, Woods C, Fonn D. Comparison of the simplicity of completing an initial fit of symptomatic early presbyopes with monovision and an aspheric multifocal silicone hydrogel. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:e-abstract 80089.
35. Woods J, Woods CA, Fonn D. Early symptomatic presbyopes - what correction modality works best? Eye Contact Lens 2009;35:221-226.
36. Morgan PB, Efron N. Prescribing soft contact lenses for astigmatism. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32:97-98.
37. Morgan PB, Efron N, Woods CA. An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom 2011;94:87-92.
38. Richdale K, Berntsen DA, Mack CJ, et al. Visual acuity with spherical and toric soft contact lenses in low- to moderate-astigmatic eyes. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:969-975.
39. Dumbleton K, Richter D, Woods C, et al. Compliance with contact lens replacement in Canada and the United States. Optom Vis Sci 2010;87:131-139.
40. Richter D, Dumbleton K, Guthrie S, et al. Patient and practitioner compliance with silicone hydrogel and daily disposable lens replacement in Canada. Can J Optom 2010;72:10-19.
41. Dumbleton K, Woods C, Jones L, et al. Patient and practitioner compliance with silicone hydrogel and daily disposable lens replacement in the United States. Eye Contact Lens 2009;35:164-171.
42. Yeung KK, Forister JF, Forister EF, et al. Compliance with soft contact lens replacement schedules and associated contact lens-related ocular complications: the UCLA Contact Lens Study. Optometry 2010;81:598-607.
43. Dumbleton K, Woods C, Jones L, et al. Comfort and vision with silicone hydrogel lenses: effect of compliance. Optom Vis Sci 2010;87:421-425.
44. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, et al. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:25-36.
45. Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, et al. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138-143.
46. Carney FP, Nash WL, Sentell KB. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:120-124.
47. Chow LM, Subbaraman LN, Sheardown H, et al. Kinetics of in vitro lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogel and FDA group II and group IV hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009;20: 71-82.
48. Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Kinetics of lysozyme activity recovered from conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2010;21:343-358.
49. Pucker AD, Thangavelu M, Nichols JJ. In vitro lipid deposition on hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51: 6334-6340.
50. Dumbleton KA, Woods CA, Jones LW, et al. The relationship between compliance with lens replacement and contact lens-related problems in silicone hydrogel wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2011;34:216-222.