Compliance with soft contact lens replacement schedules and associated contact lens-related ocular complications: The UCLA Contact Lens Study

Optometry

Volumn 81, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 598-607

  Yeung, Karen K ^a   Forister, Julie F Y ^b   Forister, Eric F ^c   Chung, Marisa Y ^d   Han, Silvia ^e   Weissman, Barry A ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c International Arbitration and Litigation Practice   (United States)

^d KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^e SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

^f JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Compliance; Complications; Contact lens solutions; Contact lenses; Disposable contact lenses; Manufacturers recommended replacement frequency

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; EYE DISEASE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REFRACTION ERROR; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; APPOINTMENTS AND SCHEDULES; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; EYE DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; SEX FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77958539644     PISSN: 15291839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.optm.2010.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Levy B. Infectious keratitis: what have we learned?. Eye & Contact Lens 2007, 33. (6, part 2 of 2 supplement):418-20.
2. Levy B., Heiler D., Norton S. Report on testing from an investigation of fusarium keratitis in contact lens wearers. Eye & Contact Lens 2006, 32(5):256-261.
3. Chun M.W., Weissman B.A. Compliance in contact lens care. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987, 64:274-276.
4. Collins M.J., Carney L.G. Patient compliance and its influence on contact lens wearing problems. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986, 63(12):952-956.
5. Dumbleton K., Woods C., Jones L., et al. Patient and practitioner compliance with silicone hydrogel and daily disposable lens replacement in the United States. Eye & Contact Lens 2009, 35(4):164-171.
6. Michaud L., Giasson C. Overwear of contact lenses: increased severity of clinical signs as a function of protein adsorption. Optom Vision Sci 2002, 79(3):184-192.
7. Bruinsma G.M., Rustema-Abbing M., de Vries J., et al. Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of pseudomonas aeruginosa. IOVS 2002, 43(12):3646-3653.
8. Forister J.Y., Forister E.F., Yeung K.K., et al. Prevalence of contact lens related complications: UCLA contact lens study. Eye & Contact Lens 2009, 35(4):176-180.
9. Chalmers R.L., Dillehay S., Long B., et al. Impact of previous extended and daily wear schedules on signs and symptoms with high Dk lotrafilcon A Lenses. Optom Vision Sci 2005, 82(6):549-554.
10. Roth H., Amon K., Bruckmann P., et al. A silicone hydrogel for daily, flexible and extended wear. Optician 2005, 230(6013):20-25.
11. Weinstock F. Study shows preference for new silicone hydrogel contact lens. Refractive Eyecare 2005, 9:24.
12. Long B., McNally J. The clinical performance of a silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear in an Asian population. Eye & Contact Lens 2006, 32:65-71.
13. Donshik P.C., Ehler W.H., Anderson L.D., et al. Strategies to better engage, educate, and empower patient compliance and safe lens wear: compliance: what we know, what we do not know, and what we need to know. Eye & Contact Lens 2007, 33(6):430-433.
14. Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1998, 18(2):182-186.
15. Thompson T. Tyler's quarterly soft contact lens parameter guide. 2008;25(4):4-15.
16. Neter J., Kutner M.H., Nachtsheim C.J., et al. Applied linear statistical models 1996, WCB/McGraw-Hill, Chicago, 768-9. 4th ed.
17. McNally J.J., Chalmers R.L., McKenney C.D., et al. Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events with 30 night continuous wear of silicone hydrogel lenses. Eye & Contact Lens 2003, 29(1S):S153-S156.
18. Zadnik K., Mutti D.O., Cutter G.R., et al. The effect of degree of refractive error on hydrogel contact lens-induced complications and patient self-management behaviors. Optom Vis Sci 2001, 78(9):652-656.
19. Solomon O.D., Freeman M.I., Boshnick E.L., et al. A 3-year prospective study of the clinical performance of daily disposable contact lenses compared with frequent replacement and conventional daily wear contact lenses. CLAO J 1996, 22(4):250-257.
20. Suchecki J.K., Ehlers W.H., Donshik P.C. A comparison of contact lens complications in various daily wear modalities. CLAO J 2000, 26(4):204-213.
21. Dart J.K., Radford C.F., Minassian D., et al. Risk factors for microbial keratitis with contemporary contact lenses: a case control study. Ophthalmology 2008, 115:1647-1654.
22. Carnt N., Jalbert I., Stretton S., et al. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vision Sci 2007, 84(4):309-315.