An evaluation of 1-day disposable contact lens wear in a population of allergy sufferers

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 85-93

  Hayes, Valérie Y ^a   Schnider, Cristina M ^a   Veys, Jane ^a  

^a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON   (United States)

Author keywords

Allergies; Daily disposable contact lenses; One day disposable contact lenses; Soft contact lenses

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN;

ADULT; ALLERGY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DEVICE; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOULD; POLLEN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLIT LAMP;

EID: 0038486020     PISSN: 13670484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1367-0484(03)00019-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. European Allergy White Paper. UCB Institute, London.
2. The National Allergy Bureau. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. http://www.aaaai.org.
3. VisionTrak data, Taylor Nelson Sofres, September 2002.
4. The allergy report, vol 1. Overview of allergic diseases. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. http://www.aaaai.org.
5. Stiegemeier M, Thomas S. Seasonal allergy relief with daily disposable lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum 2001;16(4):24-8.
6. Solomon OD, Freeman MJ, Boshnick EL, et al. A 3-year prospective study of the clinical performance of daily disposable contact lenses compared with frequent replacement and conventional daily wear contact lenses. CLAO J 1996;22:250-7.
7. Hamano H, Watanabe K, Hamano T, et al. A study of the complications induced by conventional and disposable contact lenses. CLAO J 1994;20:103-8.
8. Jones L, Jones D, Langley C, et al. Subjective responses of 100 consecutive patients to daily disposables. Optician 1996;211(5536):28-32.
9. Nason RJ, Boshnik EL, Cannon WM, et al. Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear versus conventional wear in successful contact lens wearers. J Am Optom Assoc 1994;65(11):774-80.
10. Sindt C. Daily disposable versus two-week disposable Lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum 2000;15(5):33-6.
11. Focus Dailies® (nelfilcon A) One-day Contact Lenses. 510(k) number K003586 (FDA document record reference).
12. Efron N. Efron grading scales for contact lens complications. In: Efron N, editor. Contact lens practice. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2001. p. 394-7 and Appendix K.
13. Bausch & Lomb. Trends in contact lenses and lens care 2001. Contact Lens Spectrum 2001;16(Suppl 12):16.
14. Pollen UK. National Pollen Research Unit. http://www.pollenforecast. co.uk.
15. 1:DAY ACUVUE (etafilcon A) One-Day Contact Lenses. 510(k) number K994324 (FDA document record reference).
16. Fonn D, Situ P, Simpson T. Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76(10):700-4.
17. 1-DAY ACUVUE (etafilcon A) One-Day Contact Lenses. 510(k) number K013973 (FDA document record reference).
18. Mirejovsky D, Bakhit P, Patel AS. Stability of lysozyme adsorbed in high water/ionic lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68(12s):110.
19. Hart DE. Deposits and coatings hydrogel lens/tear film interactions. In: Bennett E, Weissman B, editors. Clinical contact lens practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 3-5, 19-20.
20. Jurkus JM. Contact lens-induced giant papillary conjunctivitis. In: Silbert JA, editor. Anterior segment complications of contact lens wear. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000. p. 138-9.
21. Schnider C, Veys J, Hunt C. The use of new 1-DAY ACUVUE in patients claiming dry, sensitive or easily irritated eyes. CLAE 2002;25:206.