Application of web 2.0 tools by national libraries

Webology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Walia, Paramjeet K ^a   Gupta, Monika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Blog; Instant messaging; National libraries; RSS; Social media; Social networking; Web 2.0; World wide web

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873035951     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1735188X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aharony, N. (2009). Web 2.0 use by librarians. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 29-37.
2. Barsky E., & Purdon, M. (2006). Introducing web 2.0: social networking and social bookmarking for health libraries. JCHLA/ JABBS, 27, 65-67.
3. Bradley, P. (2007). How to use Web 2.0 in your Library. London: Facet Publication.
4. Cahill, K. (2009). Building a virtual branch at Vancouver Public Library using Web 2.0 tools. Program: electronic library and information systems, 43 (2), 140-155.
5. Chua, A., & Goh, D. (2010). A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites. Library & Information Science Research, 32 (3) 203-11.
6. Cox, A.M. (2008). Flickr: A case study of Web 2.0. Aslib Proceedings, 60 (5), 493-516.
7. Curran, K., Murray, M., & Christian, M. (2007). Taking the information to the public through Library 2.0. Library Hi Tech, 25 (2), 288-97.
8. Evans, W. (2009). Building library 3.0: Issue in creating a culture of participation. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
9. Garcia, M., & Chornet, V. (2012). Impact of Web 2.0 on national libraries. International Journal of Information Management, 32 (1), 3-10.
10. Herzog, B. (2009). Information in contaxt. In Nicole C. Engard (Ed.), Library mashups: Exploring new way to deliver library data, Facet Publishing, London, pp. 59-72.
11. Jowitt, A. (2008). Perceptions and usage of library instructional podcasts by staff and students at New Zealand's Universal College of Learning (UCOL).Reference Services Review, 36 (3), 312-336.
12. Kim, Y.M., & Abbas, J. (2010). Adoption of Library 2.0 functionalities by academic libraries and users: a knowledge management perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36 (3), 211-8.
13. Linh, N.C. (2008). A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australasian university libraries. Library Hi Tech, 26 (4), 630-53.
14. Mahmood, K., & Richardson, J.V. (2011). Adoption of Web 2.0 in US academic libraries: a survey of ARL library websites. Program: electronic library and information systems, 45 (4), 365-375.
15. McIntyre, A., & Nicolle, J. (2008). Biblioblogging: blogs for library communication. Electronic Library, 26 (5), 683-94.
16. Nguyen, L.C. (2008). A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australasian university libraries. Library Hi Tech, 26 (4), 630-656.
17. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved November 11, 2012, from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
18. Redden, C.S. (2010). Social bookmarking in academic libraries: trends and applications. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36 (3), 219-227.
19. Ram, S., Anbu K., J.P., & Kataria, S. (2011). Responding to user's expectation in the library: Innovative Web 2.0 applications at JUIT Library: a case study.Program: electronic library and information systems, 45 (4), 452-469.
20. Si, L., Shi, R., & Chen, B. (2011). An investigation and analysis of the application of Web 2.0 in Chinese university libraries. Electronic Library, 29 (5), 651-668.
21. Stephens, M. (2006). Chapter 1: Exploring web 2.0 and libraries. Library Technology Report, 42 (4), 8-14.
22. Tripathi, M., & Kumar, S. (2010). Use of Web 2.0 tools in academic libraries: a reconnaissance of the international landscape. International Information and Library Review, 42 (3), 195-207.
23. Xu, C., Ouyang, F., & Chu, H. (2009). The academic library meets Web 2.0: applications and implications. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35 (4), 324-31.