AMBER Alerts: Are School-Type Photographs the Best Choice for Identifying Missing Children?

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 9-23

  Gier, Vicki Silvers ^a   Kreiner, David S ^b   Hudnell, William Jason ^a,b  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

AMBER Alerts; Eyewitness accuracy; Face recognition; Memory for faces; Missing children

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873029254     PISSN: 08820783     EISSN: 19366469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11896-011-9085-z     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anastasi JS, Rhodes MG (2005) An own-based bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychon Bull Rev 12: 1043-1047.
2. Berger I (1999) The influence of advertising frequency on attitude-behavior consistency: a memory based analysis. J Soc Behav Pers 14: 547-568.
3. Best J (1990) Threatened children: rhetoric and concern about child-victims. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. Bluck S, Li K (2001) Predicting memory completeness and accuracy: emotion and exposure in repeated autobiographical recall. Appl Cogn Psychol 10: 3-12.
5. Blunt M, McAllister H (2009) Mug shot exposure effects: does size matter? Law Hum Behav 33: 175-182.
6. Brewer N, Wells G (2006) The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity and target-absent base rates. J Exp Psychol Appl 12: 11-30.
7. Brewer N, Caon A, Todd C, Weber N (2006) Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency. Law Hum Behav 30: 31-50.
8. Brigham J, Malpass R (1995) The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons. J Soc Issues 41: 139-155.
9. Brown J (1997, November 13) Groups take missing person search to the web. Wired News. Retrieved February 17, 2010, from http://www. wired-vig. wired. com/news/culture/0, 1284, 8513, 00. html.
10. Bruce J, Beard K, Tedford S, Harman M, Tedford K (1997) African Americans' and Caucasian Americans' recognition and likability responses to African American and Causian American faces. J Gen Psychol 124: 143-156.
11. Bruce V, Henderson Z, Greenwood K, Hancock P, Burton A, Miller P (1999) Verficiation of face identities from images captured on video. J Exp Psychol Appl 5: 339-360.
12. Chiroro P, Valentine T (1995) An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol 48A: 879-894.
13. Courtois M, Mueller J (1981) Target and distracter typicality in facial recognition. J Appl Psychol 66: 639-645.
14. Cutler B, Penrod S, Martens (1987) The reliability of eyewitness identification: the role of system and estimator variables. Law Hum Behav 11: 233-258.
15. Deffenbacher K, Loftus E (1982) Do jurors share common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? Law Hum Behav 6: 15-30.
16. Department of Justice (2003) Fact sheet: project act. Retrieved on February 15, 2010. http://www. justice. gov/opa/pr/2003/April/03_ag_266. htm.
17. Department of Justice (2004) Report to the White House on AMBER Alert. Retrieved February 2, 2010 from http://www. amberAlert. gov/docs/AMBERWHReport. pdf.
18. Department of Justice (2005) AMBER alert plans in place in all 50 states. Department of Justice observes anniversary of AMBER alert program. Retrieved on February 14, 2010. http://www. ojp. usdoj. gov/archives/pressreleases/2005/OJJDP05008. htm.
19. Dunning D, Perretta S (2002) Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: a 10-12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identification. J Appl Psychol 87: 951-962.
20. Feingold C (1914) The influence of environment on identification of persons and things. J Crim Law Police Sci 5: 39-51.
21. Ferguson D, Rhodes G, Lee K (2001) 'They all look alike to me': prejudice and cross-race face recognition. Br J Psychol 92: 567-577.
22. Fox E, Lester V, Russo R, Bowles R, Pichler A, Dutton K (2000) Facial expressions of emotions: are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cogn Emot 14: 61-92.
23. Fulton A, Bartlett JC (1991) Young and old faces in young and old heads: The factor of age in face recognition. Psychol Aging 6: 623-630.
24. Gier V, Kreiner D (2009) Memory of children's faces by adults: appearance does matter. Appl Cogn Psychol 23: 972-986.
25. Hansen C, Hansen R (1988) Finding the face in the crowd: an ager superiority effect. J Pers Soc Psychol 54: 917-924.
26. Harder K, Bloomfield J (2003) AMBER Alert Program prompts research on changeable message signs. Retrieved February 17, 2010 from http://www. cts. umn. edu/Publications/ResearchENews/2003/05/index. html#amber.
27. Henderson Z, Bruce V, Burton A (2001) Matching the faces of robbers captured on video. Appl Cogn Psychol 15: 445-464.
28. Hockley W, Hemsworth D, Consoli A (1999) Shades of the mirror effect: recognition of faces with and without sunglasses. Mem Cogn 27: 128-138.
29. Jenkins P (1998) Moral panic: changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. Yale University Press, New Haven.
30. Kebbell M, Hurren E, Roberts S (2006) Mock-suspects' decisions to confess: the accuracy of eyewitness evidence is critical. Appl Cogn Psychol 20: 477-486.
31. Kuefner D, Cassia V, Picozzi M, Bricolo E (2008) Do all kids look alike? Evidence for an other-age-effect in adults. J Exp Psychol 34: 811-817.
32. Lamont A, Stewart-Williams S, Podd J (2005) Face recognition and aging: effects of target age and memory load. Mem Cogn 33: 1017-1024.
33. Lampinen J, Arnal J, Hicks J (2009) The effectiveness of supermarket posters in helping to find missing children. J Interpers Violence 24: 406-423.
34. Lampinen J, Arnal J, Adams J, Courtney K, Hicks J (2011) Forensic age progression and the search for missing children. Psychol Crime Law 1477-2744.
35. Leppanen J, Hietanen J (2003) Affect and face perception: odors modulate recognition advantage of happy faces. Emotion 3: 315-326.
36. Leppanen J, Hietanen (2004) Positive facial expressions are recognized faster than negative facial expressions, but why? Psychol Res 69: 22-29.
37. Loftus E (1996) Eyewitness testimony. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
38. Loftus E (2005) Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learn Mem 12: 361-366.
39. Megreya A, Burton M (2006) Recognising faces seen alone or with others: when two heads are worse than one. Appl Cogn Psychol 20: 957-972.
40. Meissner C, Treduoux C, Parker J, MacLin O (2005) Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a dual-process signal detection theory analysis. Mem Cogn 33: 783-792.
41. Metzger M (2006) Face distinctiveness and dlayed testing: differential effects on performance and confidence. J Gen Psychol 133: 209-216.
42. Metzger M, Bridges K (2004) Spectacles, distinctiveness, and face recognition: a webbased experiment. Cyberpsychol Behav 7: 113-117.
43. Michel C, Caldara R, Rossion B (2006) Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces. Vis Cogn 14: 55-73.
44. Miller M, Clinkinbeard S (2006) Improving the AMBER Alert system: psychology research and policy recommendations. Law Psychol Rev 30: 1-21.
45. Miller M, Griffin T, Clinkinbeard S, Thomas R (2009) The psychology of AMBER Alert: Unresolved issues and implications. Soc Sci J 46: 111-123.
46. Munsterberg H (1908) On the witness stand. Doubleday, Page & Company, New York.
47. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) Resources for parents and guardians. Retrieved on February 14, 2010 from http://www. missingkids. com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US&PageId=200.
48. Patterson K, Baddeley A (1977) When face recognition fails. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 4: 406-417.
49. Penrod S, Kurosawa K (2008) Eyewitness errors: assessing their extent, causes, and solutions. Jpn J Psychol 7: 36-62.
50. Perfect TJ (2004) The role of self-rated ability in confidence judgments for eyewitness memory and general knowledge. Appl Cogn Psychol 18: 157-168.
51. Perfect TJ, Harris LJ (2003) Adult age differences in unconscious transference: Source confusion or identity blending? Mem Cogn 31(4): 570-580.
52. Potter R, Brewer, N (1999). Perceptions of witness behaviour-accuracy relationships held by police, lawyers and jurors. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 6: 97-103.
53. Roark D, Spence M, Abdi H, O'Toole A (2003) Memory for moving faces: psychological and neural perspectives on the role of motion in face recognition. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2: 15-46.
54. Sangrigoli S, Pallier C, Argenti A, Ventureya V, de Schonen S (2005) Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychol Sci 16: 440-444.
55. Sedlak A, Finkelhor D, Hammer H, Schultz D (2002) National estimates of missing children: an overview. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Retrieved on February 17, 2009, http://www. ncjrs. gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/196465. pdf.
56. Sporer S (2001) Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: an integration of theories. Psychol Public Policy Law 7: 36-97.
57. Sporer SL, Malpass RS, Koehnken G (1996) (eds) Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ.
58. Walmart Corporation (2001) Wal-Mart's missing children's boards result in 18 recoveries in 2001. http://walmartstores. com/FactsNews/NewsRoom/4359. aspx.
59. Wells G, Loftus E (1984) Eyewitness research: Then and now. In: Wells G, Loftus E (eds) Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1-12.
60. Wells G, Olson E (2003) Eyewitness testimony. Annu Rev Psychol 54: 277-295.
61. Wickham LHV, Morris PE, Fritz CO (2000) Facial distinctiveness: its measurement, distribution and influence on immediate and delayed recognition. Br J Psychol 91: 99-123.
62. Zaragoza M, Lane S (1994) Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20: 934-945.