Is surgery more effective than non-surgical treatment for spinal stenosis, And which non-surgical treatment is more effective? A systematic review

Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 12-20

  May, Stephen ^a   Comer, Christine ^b  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conservative treatments; Neurogenic claudication; Non operative treatment; Spinal stenosis; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; CALCITONIN; ETODOLAC; MECOBALAMIN; MEPIVACAINE; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; PLACEBO; STEROID;

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CORSET; DATA ANALYSIS; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVENTION STUDY; KINESIOTHERAPY; PATIENT CARE; PEDRO SCALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SKELETON TRACTION; STEROID THERAPY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SPINAL STENOSIS;

EID: 84872929267     PISSN: 00319406     EISSN: 18731465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.12.004     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Boden S.D., Davis D.O., Dina T.S., Patronas N.J., Wiesel S.W. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg 1990, 72A:403-408.
2. Amundsen T., Weber H., Lilleas F., Nordal H.J., Abdelnoor M., Magnaes B. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiological features. Spine 1995, 20:1178-1186.
3. Willen J., Danielson B., Gaulitz A., Niklason T., Schonstrom N., Hansson T. Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal. Axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication. Spine 1997, 22:2968-2976.
4. Takahashi K., Kagechika K., Takino T., Matsui T., Miyazaki T., Shima I. Changes in epidural pressure during walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1995, 20:2746-2749.
5. Fritz J.M., Delitto A., Welch W.C., Erhard R.E. Lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of current concepts in evaluation, management, and outcome measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1998, 79:700-708.
6. Katz J.N., Dalgas M., Stucki G., Katz N.P., Bayley J., Fossel A.H. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination. Arth Rheum 1995, 38:1236-1241.
7. Zanoli G., Stromqvist B., Jonsson B. Visual analogue scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine 2001, 26:2375-2380.
8. Taylor V.M., Deyo R.A., Cherkin D.C., Kreuter W. Low back pain hospitalization. Spine 1994, 19:1207-1213.
9. Deyo R.A., Gray D.T., Kreuter W., Mirza S., Martin B.I. United States trends in spinal fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine 2005, 30:1441-1445.
10. Amundsen T., Weber H., Nordal H.J., Magnaes B., Abdelnoor M., Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 2000, 25:1424-1436.
11. Atlas S.J., Keller R.B., Wu Y.A., Deyo R.A., Singer D.E. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 2005, 30:936-943.
12. Malmivaara A., Slätis P., Heliövaara M., Sainio P., Kinnunen H., Kankare J., et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2007, 32:1-8.
13. Mariconda M., Fava R., Gatto A., Longo C., Milano C. Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective comparative study with conservatively treated patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002, 15:39-46.
14. Weinstein J.N., Lurie J.D., Tosteson T.D., Hanscom B., Tosteson A.N., Blood E.A., et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:2257-2270.
15. Weinstein J.N., Tosteson T.D., Lurie J.D., Tosteson A.N., Blood E., Hanscom B., et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:794-810.
16. Weinstein J.N., Lurie J.D., Tosteson T.D., Zhao W., Blood E.A., Tosteson A.N., et al. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg 2009, 91:1295-1304.
17. Jansson K.A., Nemeth G., Granath F., Blomqvist P. Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years - a national analysis of 9,664 operations. Eur Spine J 2005, 14:659-663.
18. Benz R.J., Ibrahim Z.G., Afshar P., Garfin S.R. Predicting complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression. Clin Orth Rel Res 2001, 384:116-121.
19. Jonsson B., Annertz M., Sjoberg C., Stromqvist B. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part ii: five-year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 1997, 22:2938-2944.
20. Katz J.N., Lipson S.J., Chang L.C., Levine S.A., Fossel A.H., Liang M.H. Seven to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1996, 21:92-98.
21. Thome C., Zevgaridis D., Leheta O., Bäzner H., Pöckler-Schöniger C., Wöhrle J., et al. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2005, 3:129-141.
22. Gibson J.N.A., Grant I.C., Waddell G. The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Spine 1999, 24:1820-1832.
23. Gibson J.N.A., Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane review. Spine 2005, 30:2312-2320.
24. Johnsson K.E., Rosen I., Uden A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orth Rel Res 1992, 279:82-86.
25. Simotas A.C., Dorey F.J., Hansraj K.K., Cammisa F. Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine 2000, 25:197-204.
26. Tadokoro K., Miyamoto H., Sumi M., Shimomura T. The prognosis of conservative treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis. Analysis of patients over 70 years of age. Spine 2005, 30:2458-2463.
27. Fritz J.M., Erhard R.E., Vignovic M. A nonsurgical treatment approach for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Ther 1997, 77:962-973.
28. Onel D., Sari H., Donmez C. Lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical/radiologic therapeutic evaluation in 145 patients. Conservative treatment or surgical intervention?. Spine 1993, 18:291-298.
29. Simotas A.C. Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orth Rel Res 2001, 384:153-161.
30. Tomkins C.C., Dimoff K.H., Forman H.S., Gordan E.S., McPhail J., Wong J.R., et al. Physical therapy treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Back Musc Rehab 2010, 23:31-37.
31. Comer C.M., Redmond A.C., Bird H.A., Conaghan P.G. Assessment and management of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a UK primary care musculoskeletal service: a survey of current practice among physiotherapists. BMC Muscul Dis 2009, 10:121.
32. Watters W.C., Baisden J., Gilbert T.J., Kreiner S., Resnick D.H., Bono C.M., et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 2008, 8:305-310.
33. Coronado-Zarco R., Cruz-Medina E., Arellano-Hernandez A., Chavez-Arias D., Leon-Hernandez S.R. Effectiveness of calcitonin in intermittent claudication treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. A systematic review. Spine 2009, 34:E818-E822.
34. Podichetty V.K., Varley E.S., Lieberman I. Calcitonin treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis. A meta-analysis. Spine 2011, 36:E357-E364.
35. Stuber K., Sajko S., Kristmanson K. Chiropractic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of the literature. J Chir Med 2009, 8:77-85.
36. Reiman M.P., Harris J.Y., Cleland J.A. Manual therapy interventions for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review. NZ J Physiol 2009, 37:17-28.
37. De Tran Q.H., Duong S., Finlayson R.J. Lumbar spinal stenosis: a brief review of the nonsurgical management. Can J Anesth 2010, 57:694-703.
38. Kovacs F.M., Urrutia G., Alarcon J.D. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2011, 36:E1335-E1351.
39. Maher C.G., Sherrington C., Herbert R.D., Moseley A.M., Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003, 83:713-721.
40. Van Tulder M., Furlan A., Bombardier C., Bouter L.M., Deyo P.A., Shekelle P.G. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group 2003, Update Software, Oxford, Issue 4.
41. Comer C.M., Johnson M.I., Marchant P.R., Redmond A.C., Bird H.A., Conaghan P.G. The effectiveness of walking stick use for neurogenic claudication: results from a randomized trial and the effects on walking tolerance and posture. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2010, 9:15-19.
42. Cuckler J.M., Bernini P.A., Wiesel S.W., Booth R.E., Rothman R.H., Pickens G.T. The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg 1985, 67A:63-66.
43. Eskola A., Pohiolainen T., Alaranta H., Soini J., Tallroth K., Slatis P. Calcitonin treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind cross over study with one year follow-up. Calcif Tiss Int 1992, 50:400-403.
44. Fukusaki M., Kobayashi I., Hara T., Sumikawa K. Symptoms of spinal stenosis do not improve after epidural steroid injection. Clin J Pain 1998, 14:148-151.
45. Goren A., Yildiz N., Topuz O., Findikoglu G., Ardic F. Efficacy of exercise and ultrasound in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehab 2010, 24:623-631.
46. Koc Z., Ozcakir S., Sivrioglu K., Gurbet A., Kucukoglu S. Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2009, 34:985-989.
47. Kurihara A., Kataoka O., Sugawara S., Sano S., Shirai Y., Takemitsu Y., et al. Clinical benefit of OP-1206 alpha-CD on lumbar spinal canal stenosis: multi-center comparative double-blind clinical study. J Clin Ther Med/Rinsho Iyaku 1996, 12:511-529.
48. Lee J.H., An J.H., Lee S.H. Comparison of the effectiveness of interlaminar and bilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injections in treatment of patients with lumbosacral disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Clin J Pain 2009, 25:206-210.
49. Manchikanti L., Cash K.A., McManus C.D., Pampati V., Abdi S. Preliminary results of a randomized, equivalence trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain: part 4 - spinal stenosis. Pain Phys 2008, 11:833-848.
50. Manchikanti L., Cash K.A., McManus C.D., Pampati V., Singh V., Benyamin R. The preliminary results of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of adhesiolysis and caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain secondary to spinal stenosis: a randomized, equivalence controlled trial. Pain Phys 2009, 12:E341-E354.
51. Matsudaira K., Seichi A., Kunogi J., Yamazaki T., Kobayashi A., Anamizu Y., et al. The efficacy of prostaglandin E1 derivative in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2009, 34:115-120.
52. Ng L., Chaudhary N., Sell P. The efficacy of corticosteroids in periradicular infiltration for chronic radicular pain. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Spine 2005, 30:857-862.
53. Podichetty V.K., Segal A.M., Lieber M., Mazanec D.J. Effectiveness of salmon calcitonin nasal spray in the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. Spine 2004, 29:2343-2349.
54. Porter R.W., Miller C.G. Neurogenic claudication and root claudication treated with calcitonin. A double-blind trial. Spine 1988, 13:1061-1064.
55. Pua Y.H., Cai C.C., Lim K.C. Treadmill walking with body weight support is no more effective than cycling when added to an exercise program for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother 2007, 53:83-89.
56. Sahin F., Yilmaz F., Kotevoglu N., Kuran B. The efficacy of physical therapy and physical therapy plus calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Yonsei Med J 2009, 50:683-688.
57. Slätis P., Sainio P., Heliövaara M., Malmivaara A., Kinnunen H., Kankare J., et al. Randomised study to compare surgery or conservative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. 6-years follow-up. Suomen Ortopedia ja Traumatologia 2006, 29:250-253.
58. Tafazal S.I., Ng L., Sell P. Randomised placebo-controlled trial on the effectiveness of nasal salmon calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2007, 16:207-212.
59. Tafazal S.I., Ng L., Sell P. Corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain: a randomised double blind controlled trial. One year results and subgroup analysis. Eur Spine J 2009, 18:1220-1225.
60. Uratsuji M., Iguchi T., Kataoka O., Hirohata K., Naruyama S., Kurihara A. The optimal dose for OP-1206 Alpha-CD on lumbar spinal canal stenosis: multi-center comparative double-blind clinical study. J Clin Ther Med/Rinsho Iyaku 1996, 12:489-509.
61. Waikakul W., Waikakul S. Methylcobalamin as an adjuvant medication in conservative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Med Assoc Thailand/Chotmaihet Thangphaet 2000, 83:825-831.
62. Whitman J.M., Flynn T.W., Childs J.D., Wainner R.S., Gill H.E., Ryder M.G., et al. A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2006, 15:2541-2549.
63. Yaksi A., Ozgönenel L., Ozgönenel B. The efficiency of gabapentin therapy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2007, 32:939-942.
64. Zucherman J.F., Hsu K.Y., Hartjen C.A., Mehalic T.F., Implicito D.A., Martin M.J., et al. A prospective, randomized multi-center study for the treatment of spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 2004, 13:22-31.
65. Zucherman J.F., Hsu K.Y., Hartjen C.A., Mehalic T.F., Implicito D.A., Martin M.J., et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine 2005, 30:1351-1358.
66. ECRI. Health Technology Assessment Group. Treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 32. Prepared by ECRI under Contract No. 290-97-0020. AHRQ Publication No. 01-E048. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2001.
67. Hanney W.J., Kolber M.J., Cleland J.A. Motor control exercise for persistent non-specific neck pain. Phys Ther Rev 2010, 15:84-91.
68. Ho C.Y.C., Sole G., Munn J. The effectiveness of manual therapy in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder: a systematic review. Man Ther 2009, 14:463-474.
69. May S., Johnson R. Stabilisation exercises for low back pain: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 2008, 94:179-189.
70. Bhogal S.K., Teasell R.W., Foley N.C., Speechley M.R. The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad Scale in stroke rehabilitation literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58:668-673.
71. De Morton N.A. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother 2009, 55:129-133.
72. Furlan A.D., Pennick V., Bombardier C., van Tulder M., Cochrane Back Review Group 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 2009, 34:1929-1941.