A TAXONOMY OF THE PERCEIVED BENEFITS OF ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING: EVIDENCE FROM GERMAN STATES

Financial Accountability and Management

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 134-165

  Jagalla, Tobias ^a   Becker, Sebastian D ^a   Weber, Jürgen ^a  

^a WHU OTTO BEISHEIM SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

accrual accounting; Accrual Output Based Budgeting; benefits; budgeting; Germany; taxonomy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872906642     PISSN: 02674424     EISSN: 14680408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2011.00520.x     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Accounting Standards Board (ASB) (2003), Statement of Principles for Financial Reporting: Proposed Interpretation for Public Benefit Entities (ASB, London).
2. Anessi-Pessina, E. and I. Steccolini (2007), ‘Effects of Budgetary and Accruals Accounting Coexistence: Evidence from Italian Local Governments’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 113–31.
3. Anessi-Pessina, E., G. Nasi and I. Steccolini (2008), ‘Accounting Reforms: Determinants of Local Governments’ Choices’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 321–42.
4. Andon, P., J. Baxter and W. F. Chua (2007), ‘Accounting Change as Relational Drifting: A Field Study of Experiments with Performance Measurement’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 273–308.
5. Anthony, R. (1978), Financial Accounting in Nonbusiness Organizations (FASB, Stamford).
6. Arnaboldi, M. and I. Lapsley (2009), ‘On the Implementation of Accrual Accounting: A Study of Conflict and Ambiguity’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 809–36.
7. Bacharach, S. B. (1989), ‘Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 496–515.
8. Barton, A. D. (2004), ‘How to Profit from Defence: A Study in the Misapplication of Business Accounting to the Public Sector in Australia’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 281–304.
9. Blejer, M. I. and A. Cheasty (1991), ‘The Measurement of Fiscal Deficits: Analytical and Methodological Issues’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 1644–78.
10. Bogt ter, H. J. (2008), ‘Management Accounting Change and New Public Management in Local Government: A Reassessment of Ambitions and Results – An Institutionalist Approach to Accounting Change in the Dutch Public Sector’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 209–41.
11. Bogt ter, H. J. and G. J. van Helden (2000), ‘Accounting Change in Dutch Government: Exploring the Gap Between Expectations and Realizations’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 263–79.
12. Bourmistrov, A. (2006), ‘Reforming Central Government Accounting: A Comparative Study of Norway and Russia’, in E. Lande and J.-C. Scheid (eds.), Accounting Reform in the Public Sector: Mimicry, Fad or Necessity (Expert Comptable Media, Paris), pp. 3–18.
13. Broadbent, J. and J. Guthrie (2008), ‘Public Sector to Public Services: 20 Years of “Contextual” Accounting Research’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 129–69.
14. Budäus, D., C. Behm and B. Adam (2003), ‘Chapter: Germany’, in K. Lüder and R. Jones (eds.), Reforming Governmental Accounting and Budgeting in Europe (Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft, Frankfurt am Main), pp. 13–57.
15. Bürgerschaft der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg (2003, August), Drucksache 17/3161: Einführung der Kaufmännischen Buchführung in der Verwaltung, URL: http://fhh.hamburg.de/;10.08.07.
16. Burns, J. and J. Vaivio (2001), ‘Management Accounting Change’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 389–402.
17. Busco, C., P. Quattrone and A. Riccaboni (2007), ‘Management Accounting Issues in Interpreting its Nature and Change’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 125–49.
18. Caccia, L. and I. Steccolini (2006), ‘Accounting Change in Italian Local Governments: What's Beyond Managerial Fashion?’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 17, Nos. 2/3, pp. 154–74.
19. Carlin, T. (2003), ‘Unravelling the Capital Charging Riddle: Some Empirical Evidence from Victoria’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 73–92.
20. Carlin, T. (2004), ‘Output-Based Management and the Management of Performance: Insights from the Victorian Experience’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 267–83.
21. Carlin, T. (2005), ‘Debating the Impact of Accrual Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 309–36.
22. Carlin, T. (2006), ‘Victoria's Accrual Output Based Budgeting System: Delivering as Promised Some Empirical Evidence’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1–19.
23. Carlin, T. and J. Guthrie (2003), ‘Accrual Output Based Budgeting Systems in Australia: The Rhetoric-Reality Gap’, Public Management Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 145–62.
24. Carnegie, G. D. and B. P. West (2003), ‘How Well Does Accrual Accounting Fit the Public Sector?’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 83–86.
25. Christensen, M. (2006), ‘On Public Sector Accounting Change: Epistemic Communities, Consultants, Naive Officials and a Reply to Humphrey’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 289–96.
26. Christiaens, J. and V. van Peteghem (2007), ‘Governmental Accounting Reform: Evolution of the Implementation in Flemish Municipalities’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 375–99.
27. Christiaens, J. and J. Rommel (2008), ‘Accrual Accounting Reforms: Only for Businesslike (Parts of) Governments’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 59–75.
28. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) (1980), Financial Reporting for Non-Profit Organizations (CICA, Toronto).
29. Clark, C. (2010), ‘Understanding the Needs of Users of Public Sector Financial Reports: How Far Have We Come?’, International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 70–81.
30. Collins, W., D. Keenan and I. Lapsley (1991), Communication, Sophistry or Obfuscation? The Case of Local Authority Annual Reports and Accounts (CIPFA and ICAS, London and Edinburgh).
31. Colquitt, J. A. and C. P. Zapata-Phelan (2007), ‘Trends in Theory Building and Theory Testing: A Five-Decade Study of the Academy of Management Journal’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 1281–303.
32. Connolly, C. and N. Hyndman (2006), ‘The Actual Implementation of Accruals Accounting: Caveats from a Case within the UK Public Sector’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 272–90.
33. Coy, D., K. Dixon, J. Buchanan and G. Tower (1997), ‘Recipients of Public Sector Annual Reports: Theory and an Empirical Study Compared’, British Accounting Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 103–27.
34. Crain, G. W. and D. R. Bean (1998), ‘What Users Think of the New Reporting Model for Government: The Results of the GASB's Focus Group Sessions’, Government Finance Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 9–13.
35. Creswell, J. W. (2009), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks).
36. Denzau, A. T. and D. C. North (1994), ‘Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions’, Kyklos, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 3–31.
37. Drebin, A., J. Chan and L. Ferguson (1981), Objectives of Accounting and Financial Reporting for Governmental Units: A Research Study (NCGA, Chicago).
38. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), ‘Building Theory from Case Study Research’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 532–50.
39. Ellwood, S. and A. Wynne (2005), ‘An Accrual World? Questioning the Universal Validity of Accrual Accounting’, in A. Bourmistrov and F. Mellemvik (eds.), International Trends and Experiences in Governmental Accounting (Cappelen Akademisk, Oslo), pp. 158–72.
40. Evans, M. (1995), Resource Accounting and Budgeting (CIPFA, London).
41. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (1980), Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 4. Objectives of Financial Reporting by Nonbusiness Organizations (FASB, Norwalk).
42. Fischer-Heidelberger, H. (2007), ‘Am Ziel vorbei’, Move-Moderne Verwaltung, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 16–17.
43. Flyvbjerg, B. (2007), ‘Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research’, in C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium and D. Silverman (eds.), Qualitative Research in Practice (Sage Publications, London), pp. 390–404.
44. Funnell, W. and K. Cooper (1998), Public Sector Accounting and Accountability in Australia (University of New South Wales Press, Sydney).
45. Gosling, P. (1997), ‘(Interview with A. Likierman, A.) Perhaps, Minister…’, Management Accounting: Magazine for Chartered Management Accountants, Vol. 75, No. 5, pp. 30–31.
46. Groot, T. and T. Budding (2008), ‘New Public Management's Current Issues and Future Prospects’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 1–13.
47. Guthrie, J. (1998), ‘Application of Accrual Accounting in the Australian Public Sector: Rhetoric or Reality?’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 1–19.
48. Guthrie, J., O. Olson and C. Humphrey (1999), ‘Debating Developments in New Public Financial Management: The Limits of Global Theorising and Some New Ways Forward’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 15, Nos. 3/4, pp. 209–28.
49. Hay, L. E. and J. F. Antonio (1990), ‘What Users Want in Government Financial Reports’, Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 170, No. 2, pp. 91–98.
50. Heald, D. (2005), ‘The Implementation of Resource Accounting in UK Central Government’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 163–89.
51. Heald, D. and A. Dowdall (1999), ‘Capital Charging as a VFM Tool in Public Services’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 15, Nos. 3/4, pp. 229–45.
52. Hessisches Ministerium der Finanzen (1999), Kabinettvorlage vom 14.12.99 (URL:http://www.hmdf.hessen.de;10.08.07).
53. HM Treasury (1994), Better Accounting for Taxpayer's Money: Resource Accounting and Budgeting in Government (The Stationery Office, London).
54. HM Treasury (2001), Managing Resources: Full Implementation of Resource Accounting and Budgeting (The Stationery Office, London).
55. Hoggett, P. (1996), ‘New Modes of Control in the Public Service’, Public Administration, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 9–32.
56. Hood, C. (1995), ‘The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980's: Variations on a Theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20, Nos. 2/3, pp. 93–109.
57. Hoozée, S. and W. Bruggeman (2010), ‘Identifying Operational Improvements During the Design Process of a Time-Driven ABC System: The Role of Collective Worker Participation and Leadership Style’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 185–98.
58. Ingram, R. W. (1983), ‘The Importance of State Accounting Practices for Creditor Decisions’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 5–17.
59. International Federation of Accountants (IFOA) – Public Sector Committee (1997), Occasional Paper No. 3: Perspectives on Accrual Accounting (IFAC, New York).
60. Johnstone, D. (1999), ‘Public-Sector Outsourcing and Charging In-House Bidders for their Use of Capital’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 33–41.
61. Jones, D. B., R. B. Scott, L. Kimbro and R. W. Ingram (1985), The Needs of Users of Governmental Financial Reports (GASB, Stamford).
62. Jones, R. (1992), ‘The Development of Conceptual Frameworks of Accounting for the Public Sector’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 249–64.
63. Jones, R. and M. Pendlebury (2004), ‘A Theory of the Published Accounts of Local Authorities’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 305–25.
64. Jones, S. and N. Puglisi (1997), ‘The Relevance of AAS 29 to the Australian Public Sector: A Case for Doubt?’, Abacus, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 115–32.
65. Kasurinen, T. (2001), ‘Influence of the Implementation Process on Management Accounting Change in a Hierarchical Corporation’, The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 459–79.
66. Kober, R., J. Lee and J. Ng (2010), ‘Mind your Accruals: Perceived Usefulness of Financial Information in the Australian Public Sector under Different Accounting Systems’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 267–98.
67. Lapsley, I. (1992), ‘User Needs and Financial Reporting: A Comparative Study of Local Authorities and the National Health Service’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 281–98.
68. Lapsley, I. and J. Pallot (2000), ‘Accounting, Management and Organizational Change: A Comparative Study of Local Government’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 213–29.
69. Lee, R. and R. Johnson (1977), Public Budgeting Systems (University Park Press, Baltimore).
70. Likierman, A. (2000), ‘Changes to Managerial Decision-Taking in U.K. Central Government’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 253–61.
71. Likierman, A. (2003), ‘Planning and Controlling UK Public Expenditure on a Resource Basis’, Public Money & Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 45–50.
72. Lüder, K. (1992), ‘A Contingency Model of Governmental Accounting Innovations in the Political-Administrative Environment’, in Research in Governmental and Non-Profit Accounting, Vol. 7, pp. 99–127.
73. Lüder, K. and R. Jones (2003), ‘The Diffusion of Accrual Accounting and Budgeting in European Countries: A Cross-Country Analysis’, in K. Lüder and R. Jones (eds.), Reforming Governmental Accounting and Budgeting in Europe (Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft, Frankfurt am Main), pp. 14–57.
74. Lüder, K., C. Hinzmann, B. Kampmann and R. Otte (1993), Vergleichende Analyse Öffentlicher Rechnungssysteme: Querschnittsanalyse (Forschungsinstitut für Öffentliche Verwaltung, Speyer).
75. Mack, J. and C. Ryan (2006), ‘Reflections on the Theoretical Underpinnings of the General-Purpose Financial Reports of Australian Government Departments’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 592–612.
76. Malina, M. A. and F. H. Selto (2001), ‘Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard’, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 47–90.
77. Malmi, T. (1997), ‘Towards Explaining Activity-Based Costing Failure: Accounting and Control in a Decentralized Organization’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 459–80.
78. Malmi, T. (1999), ‘Activity-Based Costing Diffusion Across Organizations: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis of Finnish Firms’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 649–72.
79. Mayston, D. (1992), ‘Capital Accounting, User Needs and the Foundations of a Conceptual Framework for Public Sector Financial Reporting’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 227–48.
80. McGeough, F. (1998), ‘Resource Accounting in Ireland’, Public Money & Management, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 58–61.
81. Mellett, H. (1997), ‘The Role of Resource Accounting in the UK Government's Quest for Better Accounting’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 157–68.
82. Mellett, H. (2002), ‘The Consequences and Causes of Resource Accounting’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 231–54.
83. Mellor, T. (1996), ‘Why Governments Should Produce Balance Sheets’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 78–82.
84. Mignot, H. and C. Dolley (2000), ‘Are AAS 29 Financial Statements Useful?’, Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 51–61.
85. Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks).
86. Olson, O., J. Guthrie and C. Humphrey (eds.) (1998), Global Warning: Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management (Cappelen Akademisk, Oslo).
87. Pallot, J. (2001), ‘A Decade in Review: New Zealand's Experience with Resource Accounting and Budgeting’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 383–400.
88. Paulsson, G. (2006), ‘Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector: Experiences from the Central Government in Sweden’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 47–62.
89. Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert (2004), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
90. Potter, B. (1999), ‘The Power of Words: Explaining Recent Accounting Reforms in the Australian Public Sector’, Accounting History, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 43–72.
91. Quattrone, P. and T. Hopper (2001), ‘What Does Organizational Change Mean? Speculations on a Taken for Granted Category’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 403–35.
92. Raupach, B. and K. Stangenberg (2006), Doppik in der Öffentlichen Verwaltung: Grundlagen, Verfahrensweisen, Einsatzgebiete (Gabler, Wiesbaden).
93. Röber, M. (1996), ‘Germany’, in D. Farnham, S. Horton, J. Barlow and A. Hondeghem (eds.): New Public Managers in Europe (Macmillan, Basingstoke), pp. 169–94.
94. Robinson, M. (1998), ‘Accrual Accounting and the Efficiency of the Core Public Sector’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 21–37.
95. Rubin, I. S. (2000), The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing (4th ed., Chatham House Publishers, Chatham).
96. Rutherford, B. A. (1992), ‘Developing a Conceptual Framework for Central Government Financial Reporting, Intermediate Users and Indirect Control’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 265–80.
97. Scapens, R. W. (1994), ‘Never Mind the Gap: Towards an Institutional Perspective on Management Accounting Practice’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5, Nos. 3/4, pp. 301–21.
98. Shields, M. D. (1995), ‘An Empirical Analysis of Firms’ Implementation Experience with Activity-Based Costing’, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 148–66.
99. Stadt Hamburg (2006), Geschäftsbericht zur Eröffnungsbilanz auf den 1. Januar 2006 (Stadt Hamburg, Hamburg).
100. Stake, R. E. (2005), ‘Qualitative Case Studies’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks), pp. 443–66.
101. US Government Accounting Office (USGAO) (2000), Accrual Budgeting: Experiences of Other Nations and Implications for US (Diane Publishing, Darby).
102. Venieris, G. and S. Cohen (2004), ‘Accounting Reform in Greek Universities: A Slow Moving Process’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 183–204.
103. Watts, R. L. (1995), ‘Developments in Positive Accounting Research’, in S. Jones, C. A. Romano and J. Ratnatunga (eds.): Accounting Theory: A Contemporary Review (Harcourt Brace, London), pp. 297–354.
104. Winckelmann, H. (1949), Kameralistische und Kaufmännische Rechnungslegung in Öffentlichen Verwaltungen und Betrieben: Eine Grundsätzliche Betrachtung (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin).
105. Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks).