Reflections on the theoretical underpinnings of the general-purpose financial reports of Australian government departments

Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 592-612

  Mack, Janet ^a   Ryan, Christine ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Financial reporting; Government departments

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746356180     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09513570610679146     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Aiken, M. (1994), "Parliamentary sovereignty and valuation accruals: uncongenial conventions", Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 17-32.
2. Aiken, M. and Capitanio, C. (1995), "Accrual accounting valuations and accountability in government: a potentially pernicious union", Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 564-75.
3. Alijarde, M.I. (1997), "The usefulness of financial reporting in Spanish local governments", Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, February, pp. 17-34.
4. Anthony, R.M. (1978), FASB Research Report, Financial Accounting in Non-Business Organisations, FASB, Stamford, CT.
5. Atamian, R. and Ganguli, G. (1991), "The recipients of municipal annual financial reports: a nationwide survey", The Government Accountants JournaL, Fall, pp. 3-21.
6. Australian Accounting Research Foundation (1990a), Statement of Accounting Concepts SAC 1 'Definition of the Reporting Entity", Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.
7. Australian Accounting Research Foundation (1990b), Statement of Accounting Concepts SAC 2 'Objective of General Purpose Financial Reporting', Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.
8. Australian Accounting Research Foundation (1991), Australian Accounting Standard AAS 27 'Financial Reporting by Local Governments', Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.
9. Australian Accounting Research Foundation (1993), Australian Accounting Standard AAS 29 'Financial Reporting by Government Departments', Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.
10. Australian Accounting Research Foundation (1994), Australian Accounting Standard AAS 31 'Financial Reporting by Governments', Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.
11. Barton, A. (1999), "Public and private sector accounting - the non-identical twins", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 22-31.
12. Barton, A. (2005), "Professional accounting standards and the public sector - a mismatch", Abacus, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 138-58.
13. Boyce, G. (2000), "Public discourse and decision making", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 27-64.
14. Broadbent, J. and Laughlin, R. (2003), "Control and legitimation in government accountability processes: the private finance initiative in the UK", Critical Perspective on Accounting, Vol. 14 Nos 1-2, pp. 1-22.
15. Carlin, T. (2000), "Measurement challenges and consequences in the Australian public sector", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 63-72.
16. Carlin, T. and Guthrie, J. (2001), "The new business of government budgeting: reporting non-financial performance information in Victoria", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 12-26.
17. Carnegie, G. and Wolnizer, P. (1995), "The financial value of cultural, heritage and scientific collections: an accounting fiction", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 31-47.
18. Carnegie, G.D. and West, B.P. (2003), "How well does accrual accounting fit the public sector?", Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 83-6.
19. Cheng, R.H. (1994), "A politico-economic model of government accounting policy choice", Research in Government and Non Profit Accounting, Vol. 8, pp. 39-60.
20. Chua, W.F. and Sinclair, A. (1994), "Interests and the profession-state dynamic: explaining the emergence of the Australian Public Sector Accounting Standards Board", Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 669-705.
21. Clark, C. (2002), "The users of annual reports of government departments", paper presented at the Accountability Symposium, Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference 6 July.
22. Collins, W., Keenan, D. and Lapsley, I. (1991), Local Authority Financial Accounting - Communication Sophistry or Obfuscation, The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, London.
23. Conn, N. (1996), "Reservations about governments producing balance sheets", Australian Journal of Public Administration, March, pp. 82-5.
24. Coy, D., Fischer, M. and Gordon, T. (2001), "Public accountability: a new paradigm for college and university annual reports", Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 12, pp. 1-31.
25. Coy, D., Dixon, K., Buchanan, J. and Tower, G. (1997), "Recipients of public sector annual reports: theory and an empirical study compared", British Accounting Review, Vol. 29, pp. 103-27.
26. Crain, G.W. and Bean, D.R. (1998), "What users think of the new reporting model for government: the results of the GASB's focus group sessions", Government Finance Review, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 9-13.
27. Cuningham, A. (2001), Speech to CPA Australia Local Government Intensive Day, Brisbane, 21 August.
28. Daniels, J.D. and Daniels, C.E. (1991), "Municipal financial reports: what users want", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 10 No. 1, Spring, pp. 15-38.
29. Davidson, S. (1977), Financial Reporting by State and Local Government Units, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
30. Day, P. and Klein, R. (1987), Accountabilities: Five Public Services, Tavistock Publications, London.
31. Drebin, A., Chan, J. and Ferguson, L. (1981), Objectives of Accounting and Financial Reporting for Government Units. A Research Study, NCGA, Chicago, IL.
32. Emory, C.W. and Cooper, D.R. (1991), Business Research Methods, 4th ed., Irwin, Homewood, IL.
33. Fitzgerald, V.W., Carmichael, J., McDonough, D.D. and Thornton, B. (1996), Report of the Queensland Commission of Audit, Queensland Government Printer, Brisbane.
34. Funnell, W. (2003), "Enduring fundamentals: constitutional accountability and auditors-general in the reluctant state", Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 14 Nos 1-2, pp. 107-32.
35. Funnell, W. and Cooper, K. (1998), Public Sector Accounting and Accountability in Australia, UNSW Press, Sydney.
36. Gjesdal, F. (1981), "Accounting for stewardship", Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 208-31.
37. Gray, A. and Jenkins, B. (1985), Administrative Politics in British Government, Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton.
38. Gray, A. and Jenkins, B. (1993), "Codes of accountability in the new public sector", Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 52-67.
39. Guthrie, J. (1998), "Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector - rhetoric or reality?", Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, February, pp. 1-19.
40. Hay, L.E. and Antonio, J.F. (1990), "What users want in government financial reports", Journal of Accountancy, August, pp. 91-8.
41. Hines, R.D. (1988), "Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality", Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 251-61.
42. Holder, W.W. (1980), A Study of Selected Concepts for Government Financial Accounting and Reporting, Research Paper, NCGA, Chicago, IL.
43. Hopwood, A. (1984), "Accounting and the pursuit of efficiency", in Hopwood, A. and Tomkins, C. (Eds), Issues in Public Sector Accounting, Philip Allan, Oxford.
44. Hopwood, A.G. (1985), "Accounting and the domain of the public: some observations on current developments", The Price Waterhouse Public Lecture on Accounting, University of Leeds, Leeds, November.
45. Ijiri, Y. (1983), "On the accountability-based conceptual framework of accounting", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 2, pp. 75-81.
46. Jones, D.B., Scott, R.B., Kimbro, L. and Ingram, R. (1985), The Needs of Users of Governmental Financial Reports, Government Accounting Standards Board, Stamford, CT.
47. Jones, S. and Puglisi, N. (1997), "The relevance of AAS29 to the Australian public sector: a cause for doubt?", Abacus, Vol. 33 No. 1, March, pp. 115-33.
48. Karan, R. (2003), "Selective commercialisation of pblic-sector accounting and its consequences for public accountability", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 15-25.
49. Leftwich, R. (1980), "Market failure fallacies and accounting information", Journal of Accounting and Economics, December, pp. 193-211.
50. McCrae, M. and Aiken, M. (1994), "AAS 29 and public sector reporting: unresolved issues", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 65-72.
51. Ma, R. and Mathews, R. (1993), "Financial reporting by government departments: ED 55 - a dissenting view", Australian Journal of Corporate Law, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 67-88.
52. Mayston, D. (1993), "Principals, agents and the economics of accountability in the new public sector", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 68-96.
53. Mignot, H. and Dolley, C. (2000), "Are AAS 29 financial statements useful?", Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 51-61.
54. Mulgan, R. (2000), "'Accountability': an ever-expanding concept?", Discussion Paper No. 72, ANU Public Policy Program.
55. Newberry, S. (2003), "Sector neutrality' and NPM 'incentives': their use in eroding the public sector'", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 28-34.
56. Nicholls, D. (1991), Managing State Finance, NSW Treasury, Sydney.
57. Office of the Auditor General of Canada and the United States General Accounting Office (1985), Federal Government Reporting Study, Washington, DC.
58. Pallot, J. (1991), "The legitimate concern with fairness: a comment", Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 201-8.
59. Pallot, J. (1999), "Beyond NPM: developing strategic capacity", Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 419-26.
60. Pallot, J. (2001), "Reporting and auditing performance in the public sector", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 2-3.
61. Pallot, J. (2003), "A wider accountability? The audit office and New Zealand's bureaucratic revolution", Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 14 Nos 1-2, pp. 133-55.
62. Parker, L. and Gould, G. (1999), "Changing public sector accountability: critiquing new directions", Accounting Forum, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 109-35.
63. Priest, A.N., Ng, J. and Dolley, C. (1999), "Users of local government annual reports: information preferences", Accounting, Accountability and Performance, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 49-62.
64. Queensland Public Accounts Committee (2001), Report No 59: Annual Reporting in the Queensland Public Sector, available at: www.parliament.qld.gov. au/Committees/.
65. Revsine, L. (1991), "The selective financial misrepresentation hypothesis", Accounting Horizons, December, pp. 16-27.
66. Robbins, W.A. (1984), "Consensus between preparers and users of municipal annual reports: an empirical analysis", Accounting and Business Research, Spring, pp. 157-62.
67. Ryan, C. (1998), "The introduction of accrual reporting policy in the Australian public sector: an agenda-setting explanation", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 518-39.
68. Rutherford, B.A. (1992), "Developing a conceptual framework for central government financial reporting, intermediate users and indirect control", Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 8 No. 4, Winter, pp. 265-80.
69. Sharp, F.C. and Carpenter, F.H. (1998), "Popular financial reports for citizens", CPA Journal, Vol. 68 No. 3, pp. 34-9.
70. Stanton, P. and Stanton, J. (1998), "The questionable economics of governmental accounting", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 191-203.
71. Stone, E. (1978), Research Methods in Organisational Behavior, Goodyear Publishing Company, Santa Monica, CA.
72. Taylor, D.W. and Rosair, M. (2000), "The effects of participating parties, the public and size on government departments' accountability disclosures in annual reports", Accounting Accountability and Performance, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 77-97.
73. Van Daniker, R.P. and Kwiatowski, V. (1986), Infrastructure Assets: An Assessment of user Needs and Recommendations for Financial Reporting, Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, CT.
74. Walker, R.G. (1989), "Should there be common standards for the public and private sectors", in Guthrie, J., Parker, L. and Shand, D. (Eds), The Public Sector: Contemporary Readings in Accounting and Auditing, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego, CA.
75. Walker, R.G. (2001), "Reporting on service efforts and accomplishments on a 'whole of government' basis", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 4-17.
76. Walker, R.G. (2002), "Are annual reports of government agencies really 'general-purpose' if they do not include performance indicators", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 43-54.
77. Wanna, J., O'Faircheallaigh, C. and Weller, P. (1992), Public Sector Management in Australia, Macmillan, Melbourne.
78. Williams, P.F. (1987), "The legitimate concern with fairness", Accounting Organisations and Society, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 169-89.
79. Willmott, H.C. (1985), "Setting accounting standards in the UK: the emergence of private accounting bodies and their role in the regulation of public accounting practice", in Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P.C. (Eds), Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State, Sage, London.
80. Australian Accounting Standards Board (2004), 'The Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements', AASB, Melbourne.
81. Ryan, C. (1999), "Australian public sector financial reporting: a case of cooperative policy formulation", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 561-82.
82. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (1985), Local Government Financial Reporting, a Research Study, CICA, Toronto.