MIND YOUR ACCRUALS: PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN THE AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC SECTOR UNDER DIFFERENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS

Financial Accountability and Management

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 267-298

  Kober, Ralph ^a   Lee, Janet ^a   Ng, Juliana ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

accrual accounting; cash accounting; Government Finance Statistics; public sector decision usefulness

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951577962     PISSN: 02674424     EISSN: 14680408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2010.00502.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Australian Accounting Research Foundation (1998), Australian Accounting Standard AAS29 Financial Reporting by Government Departments (June).
2. Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) (2004), Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements (July).
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2005), Australian System of Government Finance Statistics, Concepts, Sources and Methods, 5514.0. Commonwealth of Australia (September).
4. Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (1994), Accrual Reporting, Are Agencies Ready? Audit Report No. 32, 1993–94, Commonwealth of Australia.
5. Barrett, P. (2004), ‘Financial Management in the Public Sector – How Accrual Accounting and Budgeting Enhances Governance and Accountability’, Speech presented at The Challenge of Change: Driving Governance and Accountability, CPA Forum (Singapore, August, Australian National Audit Office).
6. Barton, A. (1999), ‘Public and Private Sector Accounting – The Non-identical Twins’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 22–31.
7. Barton, A. (2002), Accrual Accounting in Government: A Review of its Applications, Achievements and Problems, and Proposals for Reform, Annual Research Lecture in Government Accounting (The Australian National University and CPA Australia, November).
8. Barton, A. (2004), ‘How to Profit from Defence: A Study in the Misapplication of Business Accounting to the Public Sector in Australia’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 281–304.
9. Barton, A. (2007), ‘Accrual Accounting and Budgeting Systems Issues in Australian Governments’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 38–50.
10. Benito, B., I. Brusca and V. Montesinos (2007), ‘The Harmonization of Government Financial Information Systems: The Role of the IPSASs’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 293–317.
11. Blöndal, J. (2003), ‘Accrual Accounting and Budgeting: Key Issues and Recent Developments’, OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 43–60.
12. Burns, J. and R.W. Scapens (2000), ‘Conceptualizing Management Accounting Change: An Institutional Framework’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 3–25.
13. Cameron, W. (2006), ‘Public Sector Accounting and Auditing, How Well Have We Travelled Thus Far – And Where To From Here’, CPA Australia Annual Research Lecture (Canberra, 15 November).
14. Carlin, T. (2005), ‘Debating the Impact of Accrual Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 309–36.
15. Carlin, T. and J. Guthrie (2001), ‘The New Business of Government Budgeting: Reporting Non-financial Performance Information in Victoria’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 17–26.
16. Carnegie, G. and B. West (2005), ‘Making Accounting Accountable in the Public Sector’, Critical Perspective on Accounting, Vol. 16, pp. 905–28.
17. Challen, D. and C. Jeffery (2003), ‘Harmonisation of Government Finance Statistics and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 48–53.
18. Christensen, M. (2003), ‘Without Reinventing the Wheel: Business Accounting Applied to the Public Sector’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 22–27.
19. Commonwealth Department of Treasury (2000), Accrual Uniform Presentation Framework (Commonwealth of Australia, April).
20. Conn, N. (1996), ‘Reservations about Governments Producing Balance Sheets’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 82–85.
21. Connolly, C. and N. Hyndman (2006), ‘The Actual Implementation of Accruals Accounting: Caveats from a Case Within the UK Public Sector’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 272–90.
22. CPA Australia (2003), Striking the Balance, Effective Balance Sheet Management in the Public Sector (CPA Australia, Melbourne).
23. Ellwood, S. (2003), ‘Bridging the GAAP Across the UK Public Sector’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 105–21.
24. Ellwood, S. and S. Newberry (2007), ‘Public Sector Accrual Accounting: Institutionalising Neo-liberal Principles?’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 549–73.
25. European Federation of Accountants (FEE) (2007), Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector (January).
26. Guthrie, J. (1998), ‘Application of Accrual Accounting in the Australian Public Sector: Rhetoric or Reality?’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 1–19.
27. Hoek, M.P. van der (2005), ‘From Cash to Accrual Budgeting and Accounting in the Public Sector: The Dutch Experience’, Public Budgeting and Finance (Spring), pp. 32–45.
28. Hood, C. (1995), ‘The New Public Management in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20, No 2/3, pp. 93–103.
29. International Accounting Standards Board (2008), An Improved Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, Exposure Draft (May).
30. International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) (2005), International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs) and Statistical Bases of Financial Reporting: An Analysis of Differences and Recommendations for Convergence, Research Report (International Federation of Accountants, January).
31. International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) (2006), The Road to Accrual Accounting in the United States of America, Information Paper, International Federation of Accountants (March).
32. Jones, R. (2000a), ‘National Accounting, Government Budgeting and the Accounting Discipline’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 101–16.
33. Jones, R. (2000b), ‘Public Versus Private: The Empty Definitions of National Accounting’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 167–78.
34. Jones, S. and N. Puglisi (1997), ‘The Relevance of AAS29 to the Australian Public Sector: A Cause for Doubt?’, Abacus, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 115–32.
35. Keuning, S. and D. Van Tongeren (2004), ‘The Relationship Between Government Accounts and National Accounts, With Special Reference to The Netherlands’, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 50, No. 2, pp. 167–79.
36. Lande, E. (2000), ‘Macro-Accounting and Micro-Accounting Relationships in France’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 151–65.
37. Lüder, K. (2000), ‘National Accounting, Governmental Accounting and Cross-Country Comparisons of Government Financial Condition’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 117–28.
38. Lye, J., H. Perera and A. Rahman, (2005), ‘The Evolution of Accruals-based Crown (Government) Financial Statements in New Zealand’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 784–815.
39. Management Advisory Board, Management Improvement Advisory Committee (MAB) (1992), The Australian Public Service Reformed: An Evaluation of a Decade of Management Reform, Task Force on Management Improvement (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra).
40. Management Advisory Board, Management Improvement Advisory Committee (MAB) (1997), Beyond Bean Counting: Effective Financial Management in the APS, 1998 and Beyond (AGPS, Canberra).
41. Mellor, T. (1996), ‘Why Governments Should Produce Balance Sheets’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 13, pp. 231–54.
42. Montesinos, V. and J. Vela (2000), ‘Governmental Accounting in Spain and The European Monetary Union: A Critical Perspective’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 16, No. 2 (May), pp. 129–50.
43. Newberry, S. (2003), ‘Sector Neutrality and NPM ‘Incentives’: Their Use in Eroding the Public Sector’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 28–34.
44. Olson, O., J. Guthrie and C. Humphrey (1998), ‘International Experiences with New Public Financial Management (NPFM) Reforms: New World? Small World? Better World?’, in O. Olson, J. Guthrie and C. Humphrey (eds.), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management (Cappelen Akademisk Forlag as, Oslo), pp. 17–48.
45. Pallot, J. (1998), ‘The New Zealand Revolution’, in O. Olson, J. Guthrie and C. Humphrey (eds.), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management (Cappelen Akademisk Forlag as, Oslo), pp. 156–84.
46. Pallot, J. (2001), ‘A Decade in Review: New Zealand's Experience with Resource Accounting and Budgeting’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 383–400.
47. Parker, L. and G. Gould (1999), ‘Changing Public Sector Accountability: Critiquing New Directions’, Accounting Forum, Vol. 23, No. 2 (June), pp. 109–35.
48. Paulsson, G. (2006), ‘Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector: Experiences from the Central Government in Sweden’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 47–62.
49. Ryan, C. (1998), ‘The Introduction of Accrual Reporting Policy in the Australian Public Sector: An Agenda Setting Explanation’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 518–39.
50. Scapens, R.W. (1994). ‘Never Mind the Gap: Towards an Institutional Perspective of Management Accounting Practices’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5, pp. 301–21.
51. Siti-Nabiha, A.K. and R.W. Scapens (2005), ‘Stability and Change: An Institutionalist Study of Management Accounting Change’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 44–73.
52. Torres, L. (2004), ‘Accounting and Accountability: Recent Developments in Government Financial Information Systems’, Public Administration and Development, Vol. 24, pp. 447–56.