Vascular imaging of the head and neck

Seminars in Neurology

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 401-410

  Jadhav, Ashutosh P ^a   Jovin, Tudor G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

aneurysm; arteriovenous malformation; carotid stenosis; computed tomographic angiography (CTA); digital subtraction angiography (DSA); dissection; hemorrhage; magnetic resonance angiography (MRA); stroke; vasculopathy

Indexed keywords

AMNESIA; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CAROTID ARTERY; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEUROIMAGING; OCCLUSIVE CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SUBDURAL HEMATOMA; VASOSPASM;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANIMALS; HEAD; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NECK; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VASCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 84872894887     PISSN: 02718235     EISSN: 10989021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331811     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Hopkins L. N., Lanzino G., Guterman L. R. Treating complex nervous system vascular disorders through a "needle sticko": origins, evolution, and future of neuroendovascular therapy. Neurosurgery: 2001; 48 3 463 475 (Pubitemid 32199594)
2. Dawkins A. A., Evans A. L., Wattam J., et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology: 2007; 49 9 753 759 (Pubitemid 47382115)
3. Thiex R., Norbash A. M., Frerichs K. U. The safety of dedicated-team catheter-based diagnostic cerebral angiography in the era of advanced noninvasive imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol: 2010; 31 2 230 234
4. Fifi J. T., Meyers P. M., Lavine S. D., et al. Complications of modern diagnostic cerebral angiography in an academic medical center. J Vasc Interv Radiol: 2009; 20 4 442 447
5. Matsumoto Y., Hongo K., Toriyama T., Nagashima H., Kobayashi S. Transradial approach for diagnostic selective cerebral angiography: results of a consecutive series of 166 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol: 2001; 22 4 704 708 (Pubitemid 32318700)
6. Samaniego E. A., Dabus G., Raju R., Tsoukas A. I., Linfante I. Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting Through Direct Carotid Puncture. J Neuroimaging: 2011; [Epub ahead of print]
7. Mohr J. P. Stroke: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA Elsevier/Saunders: 2011; xxv, 1485
8. McVerry F., Liebeskind D. S., Muir K. W. Systematic review of methods for assessing leptomeningeal collateral flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol: 2012; 33 3 576 582
9. Delgado Almandoz J. E., Romero J. M., Pomerantz S. R., Lev M. H. Computed tomography angiography of the carotid and cerebral circulation. Radiol Clin North Am: 2010; 48 2 265 281, vii-viii
10. Thaker N. G., Turner J. D., Cobb W. S., et al. Computed tomographic angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for the postoperative detection of residual aneurysms: a single-institution series and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg: 2012; 4 3 219 225
11. Hassan A. E., Rostambeigi N., Chaudhry S. A., et al. Combination of noninvasive neurovascular imaging modalities in stroke patients: patterns of use and impact on need for digital subtraction angiography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis: 2012;. [Epub ahead of print]
12. Ozsarlak O., Van Goethem J. W., Maes M., Parizel P. M. MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications. Neuroradiology: 2004; 46 12 955 972 (Pubitemid 40823320)
13. Wheaton A. J., Miyazaki M. Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: physical principles. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2012; 36 2 286 304
14. Levine G. N., Gomes A. S., Arai A. E., et al. American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation: 2007; 116 24 2878 2891 (Pubitemid 350291228)
15. Barazangi N., Wintermark M., Lease K., Rao R., Smith W., Josephson S. A. Comparison of computed tomography angiography and transesophageal echocardiography for evaluating aortic arch disease. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis: 2011; 20 5 436 442
16. Griffiths G. D., Razzaq R., Farrell A., Ashleigh R., Charlesworth D. Variability in measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis by arch angiography and duplex ultrasonography-time for a reappraisal? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg: 2001; 21 2 130 136 (Pubitemid 32243905)
17. Zhang Z., Berg M., Ikonen A., et al. Carotid stenosis degree in CT angiography: assessment based on luminal area versus luminal diameter measurements. Eur Radiol: 2005; 15 11 2359 2365 (Pubitemid 41600123)
18. Debrey S. M., Yu H., Lynch J. K., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke: 2008; 39 8 2237 2248
19. Etesami M., Hoi Y., Steinman D. A., et al. Comparison of carotid plaque ulcer detection using contrast-enhanced and time-of-flight MRA techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol: 2012;. [Epub ahead of print]
20. Prokop M., Shin H. O., Schanz A., Schaefer-Prokop C. M. Use of maximum intensity projections in CT angiography: a basic review. Radiographics: 1997; 17 2 433 451 (Pubitemid 127465067)
21. Sheehy N., MacNally S., Smith C. S., Boyle G., Madhavan P., Meaney J. F. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of subclavian steal syndrome: value of the 2D time-of-flight "localizero" sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2005; 185 4 1069 1073
22. Edgell R. C., Zaidat O. O., Gupta R., et al. Multicenter study of safety in stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery origin stenosis: results from the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Research Consortium. J Neuroimaging: 2011;. [Epub ahead of print]
23. Kumar Dundamadappa Md S., Cauley Md Phd K. Vertebral artery ostial stenosis: prevalence by digital subtraction angiography, MR angiography, and CT angiography. J Neuroimaging: 2012;. [Epub ahead of print]
24. Selim M., Caplan L. R. Carotid artery dissection. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med: 2004; 6 3 249 253 (Pubitemid 39359618)
25. Provenzale J. M., Sarikaya B., Hacein-Bey L., Wintermark M. Causes of misinterpretation of cross-sectional imaging studies for dissection of the craniocervical arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2011; 196 1 45 52
26. Provenzale J. M., Sarikaya B. Comparison of test performance characteristics of MRI, MR angiography, and CT angiography in the diagnosis of carotid and vertebral artery dissection: a review of the medical literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2009; 193 4 1167 1174
27. Gelal F. M., Kitis O., Calli C., Yunten N., Vidinli B. D., Uygur M. Craniocervical artery dissection: diagnosis and follow-up with MR imaging and MR angiography. Med Sci Monit: 2004; 10 10 MT109 MT116 (Pubitemid 39429468)
28. Puetz V., Sylaja P. N., Coutts S. B., et al. Extent of hypoattenuation on CT angiography source images predicts functional outcome in patients with basilar artery occlusion. Stroke: 2008; 39 9 2485 2490
29. Hirai T., Korogi Y., Ono K., et al. Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol: 2002; 23 1 93 101 (Pubitemid 34098265)
30. Bash S., Villablanca J. P., Jahan R., et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol: 2005; 26 5 1012 1021 (Pubitemid 43821943)
31. Nguyen-Huynh M. N., Wintermark M., English J., et al. How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease? Stroke: 2008; 39 4 1184 1188 (Pubitemid 351440689)
32. Yoon D. Y., Choi C. S., Kim K. H., Cho B. M. Multidetector-row CT angiography of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of volume-rendered images and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol: 2006; 27 2 370 377 (Pubitemid 44897845)
33. Kumar S., Goddeau R. P. Jr, Selim M. H., et al. Atraumatic convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical presentation, imaging patterns, and etiologies. Neurology: 2010; 74 11 893 899
34. Romijn M., Gratama van Andel H. A., van Walderveen M. A., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol: 2008; 29 1 134 139
35. McKinney A. M., Palmer C. S., Truwit C. L., Karagulle A., Teksam M. Detection of aneurysms by 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients acutely suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm and comparison with digital subtraction and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol: 2008; 29 3 594 602 (Pubitemid 351424081)
36. Agid R., Andersson T., Almqvist H., et al. Negative CT angiography findings in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: When is digital subtraction angiography still needed? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol: 2010; 31 4 696 705
37. Connolly E. S. Jr, Rabinstein A. A., Carhuapoma J. R., et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Clinical Cardiology Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke: 2012; 43 6 1711 1737
38. Khandelwal N., Agarwal A., Kochhar R., et al. Comparison of CT venography with MR venography in cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2006; 187 6 1637 1643 (Pubitemid 44788699)
39. Linn J., Michl S., Katja B., et al. Cortical vein thrombosis: the diagnostic value of different imaging modalities. Neuroradiology: 2010; 52 10 899 911
40. Agid R., Shelef I., Scott J. N., Farb R. I. Imaging of the intracranial venous system. Neurologist: 2008; 14 1 12 22
41. White J. B., Kaufmann T. J., Kallmes D. F. Venous sinus thrombosis: a misdiagnosis using MR angiography. Neurocrit Care: 2008; 8 2 290 292