Non-invasive computed tomography coronary angiography as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiography

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 221-228

  De Graaf, Fleur R ^a   Van Velzen, Joëlla E ^a,b   De Boer, Stephanie M ^a   Van Werkhoven, Jacob M ^a,b   Kroft, Lucia J ^a   De Roos, Albert ^a   Sieders, Allard ^c   De Grooth, Greetje J ^a   Jukema, J Wouter ^a,b   Schuijf, Joanne D ^a   Bax, Jeroen J ^a   Schalij, Martin J ^a   Van Der Wall, Ernst E ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c RIJNLAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cardiac imaging; Coronary artery disease; Invasive coronary angiography; Multidetector computed tomography

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL; METOPROLOL;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;

ADULT; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURES;

EID: 84872857311     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0059-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK et al (2007) Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 356(15):1503-1516
2. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD et al (2004) Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(2):200-208
3. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB et al (2007) Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(12):1161-1170
4. van Velzen JE, de Graaf FR, Kroft LJ et al (2011) Performance and efficacy of 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography in patients presenting with acute chest pain: results from a clinical registry. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21(11):2285-2296
5. van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O et al (2009) Incremental prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography over coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 30(21):2622-2629
6. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(22):1864-1894
7. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Evaluation of contraindications and efficacy of oral Beta blockade before computed tomographic coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 105(6):767-772
8. de Graaf FR, van Werkhoven JM, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular function analysis over non-invasive coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 17(6):1034-1040
9. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 98(2):145-148
10. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW et al (2006) Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(12):2508-2514
11. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. Invest Radiol 45(6):331-340
12. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(2):122-136
13. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31(15):1908-1915
14. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(25):2135-2144
15. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, van Werkhoven JM et al (2008) Multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for ruling out suspected coronary artery disease: what is the prevalence of a normal study in a general clinical population? Eur Heart J 29(16):2006-2013
16. Chow BJ, Abraham A, Wells GA et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy and impact of computed tomographic coronary angiography on utilization of invasive coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2(1):16-23
17. Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP et al (2011) Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(10):1237-1247
18. Bateman TM, O'Keefe JH Jr, Dong VM et al (1995) Coronary angiographic rates after stress single-photon emission computed tomographic scintigraphy. J Nucl Cardiol 2(3):217-223
19. Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS et al (1999) The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. Economics of noninvasive diagnosis (END) multicenter study group. J Am Coll Cardiol 33(3):661-669
20. Wijns W, De BB, Vanhoenacker PK (2007) What does the clinical cardiologist need from noninvasive cardiac imaging: is it time to adjust practices to meet evolving demands? J Nucl Cardiol 14(3):366-370
21. Nucifora G, Schuijf JD, van Werkhoven JM et al. (2010) Relationship between obstructive coronary artery disease and abnormal stress testing in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(6):777-785
22. van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O et al (2009) Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(7):623-632
23. Priest VL, Scuffham PA, Hachamovitch R et al (2011) Cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography and cardiac stress imaging in the emergency department: a decision analytic model comparing diagnostic strategies for chest pain in patients at low risk of acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4(5):549-556
24. Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Johansen A, Christensen HW et al (2006) Potential impact of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy as gatekeeper for invasive examination and treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris: observational study without post-test referral bias. Eur Heart J 27(1):29-34
25. Budoff MJ, Karwasky R, Ahmadi N et al (2009) Cost-effectiveness of multidetector computed tomography compared with myocardial perfusion imaging as gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography in asymptomatic firefighters with positive treadmill tests. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(5):323-330
26. Achenbach S, Daniel WG (2010) Cardiac imaging in the patient with chest pain: coronary CT angiography. Heart 96(15):1241-1246
27. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M et al (2008) Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 118(5):586-606
28. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, Scholte AJ et al (2010) Usefulness of hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype in type 2 diabetes mellitus to predict the presence of coronary artery disease as assessed by computed tomographic coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 106(12):1747-1753
29. van der Wall EE, Jukema JW, Schuijf JD et al (2011) 100 kV versus 120 kV: effective reduction in radiation dose? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(4):587-591
30. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT et al. (2011) Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 33(1):67-77