Management modeling of suspended solids in the Chesapeake Bay, USA

Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

Volumn 116, Issue , 2013, Pages 87-98

  Cerco, Carl F ^a   Kim, Sung Chan ^b   Noel, Mark R ^a  

^a U S ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

^b US ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Estuaries; Eutrophication; Light attenuation; Models; Suspended particulate matter

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENT; ESTUARINE POLLUTION; EUTROPHICATION; LIGHT ATTENUATION; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; NUMERICAL MODEL; NUTRIENT CYCLING; POLLUTANT SOURCE; SUSPENDED LOAD; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; WATER QUALITY;

CHESAPEAKE BAY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84872801131     PISSN: 02727714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. American Public Health Association Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. A. Eaton, L. Clesceri, E. Rice, A. Greenberg (Eds.).
2. Biggs R. Sources and distribution of suspended sediment in northern Chesapeake Bay. Marine Geology 1970, 9:187-201.
3. Caraco N., Cole J., Strayer D. Top-down control from the bottom: regulation of eutrophication in a large river by benthic grazing. Limnology and Oceanography 2006, 51:664-670.
4. Carter V., Paschal J., Bartwo N. Distribution and Abundance of Submersed Aquatic Vegetation in the Tidal Potomac River Estuary, Maryland and Virginia, May 1978 to November 1981 1985, U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2234-A, United States Geological Survey, Alexandria, VA.
5. Carter V., Barko J., Godshalk G., Rybicki N. Effects of submersed macrophytes on water quality in the tidal Potomac River, Maryland. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 1988, 4(4):493-501.
6. Cerco C., Cole T. Three-dimensional eutrophication model of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Environmental Engineering 1993, 119(6):1006-1025.
7. Cerco C., Meyers M. Tributary refinements to the Chesapeake Bay Model. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2000, 126(2):164-174.
8. Cerco C., Moore K. System-wide submerged aquatic vegetation model for Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 2001, 24(4):522-534.
9. Cerco C., Noel M. Process-based primary production modeling in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2004, 282:45-58.
10. Cerco C., Noel M. Can oyster restoration reverse cultural eutrophication in Chesapeake Bay?. Estuaries and Coasts 2007, 30(2):331-343.
11. Cerco C., Seitzinger S. Measured and modeled effects of benthic algae on eutrophication in Indian River - Rehoboth Bay Delaware. Estuaries 1997, 20(1):231-248.
12. Cerco C., Noel M., Linker L. Managing for water clarity in Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2004, 130(6):631-642.
13. Cerco C., Kim S.-C., Noel M. The 2010 Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication Model 2010, A Report to the US Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program and to the US Army Engineer Baltimore District, Available from:. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/the_2010_chesapeake_bay_eutrophication_model1.
14. Chesapeake Research Consortium The Effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on the Chesapeake Bay Estuarine System. CRC Publication 54 1976, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. E. Ruzecki, J. Schubel, R. Huggett, A. Anderson (Eds.).
15. Cohen R., Dresler P., Phillips E., Cory R. The effect of the Asiatic clam, Corbicula fluminea, on phytoplankton of the Potomac River, Maryland. Limnology and Oceanography 1984, 29:170-180.
16. de la Rocha C. The biological pump. The Oceans and Marine Geochemistry 2006, 84-107. Elsevier, Amsterdam. H. Elderfield (Ed.).
17. Dennis R.L., Mathur R., Pleim J., Walker J. Fate of ammonia emissions at the local and regional scale as simulated by the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model. Atmospheric Pollution Research 2010, 1(4):207-214.
18. DiToro D. Sediment Flux Modeling 2001, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 624 pp.
19. Fugate D., Friedrichs C. Determining concentration and fall velocity of estuarine particle populations using ADV, OBS, and LISST. Continental Shelf Research 2002, 22(10):1867-1886.
20. Gallegos C. Calculating optical water quality targets to restore and protect submerged aquatic vegetation: overcoming problems in partitioning the diffuse attenuation coefficient for photosynthetically active radiation. Estuaries 2001, 24(3):381-397.
21. Gallegos C., Moore K. Factors contributing to water-column light attenuation. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Water Quality and Habitat-Based Requirements and Restoration Targets 2000, US Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD, EPA 903-R-00-014, pp. 35-54. R. Batiuk (Ed.).
22. Gallegos C., Werdell P., McClain C. Long-term changes in light scattering in Chesapeake Bay inferred from Secchi depth, light attenuation, and remote sensing measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research 2011, 117:1-19.
23. Grimm J., Lynch J. Enhanced wet deposition estimates using modeled precipitation inputs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2004, 90:243-268.
24. Hagy J., Boynton W., Keefe C., Wood K. Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950-2001: long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow. Estuaries 2004, 27(4):634-658.
25. Harris C., Wiberg P. A two-dimensional, time-dependent model of suspended sediment transport and bed re-working for continental shelves. Computers & Geosciences 2001, 27:675-690.
26. Harris, C., Rinehimer, J., Kim, S.-C. Estimates of bed stresses within a model of Chesapeake Bay. In: Spaulding, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Estuarine and Coastal Modeling. American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington DC, in press.
27. Hobbs C., Halka J., Kerhin R., Carron M. Chesapeake Bay sediment budget. Journal of Coastal Research 1992, 8(2):292-300.
28. James W., Barko J., Butler M. Shear stress and sediment resuspension in relation to submersed macrophyte biomass. Hydrobiologia 2004, 515:181-191.
29. Johnson B.H., Kim K., Heath R., Hsieh B., Butler L. Validation of a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1993, 119:2-20.
30. Kearney M., Rogers J., Townshend E., Rizzo E., Stutzer D., Stevenson J., Sundborg K. Landsat imagery shows decline of coastal marshes in Chesapeake and Delaware Bays. Eos 2002, 83(16). pp. 173, 177-178.
31. Kemp W., Twilley R., Stevenson J., Boynton W., Means J. The decline of submerged vascular plants in the upper Chesapeake Bay: summary of results concerning possible causes. Marine Technology Science Journal 1983, 17:78-89.
32. Kemp W.M., Smith E., DiPasquale M., Boynton W. Organic carbon balance and net ecosystem metabolism in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1997, 150:229-248.
33. Kemp W., Boynton W., Adolf J., Boesch D., Boicourt W., Brush G., Cornwell J., Fisher T., Glibert P., Hagy J., Harding L., Houde E., Kimmel D., Miller W., Newell R., Roman M., Smith E., Stevenson J. Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2005, 303:1-29.
34. Langland M., Cronin T. A Summary Report of Sediment Processes in Chesapeake Bay and Watershed 2003, Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4123, United States Geological Survey, New Cumberland, PA, Available from:. http://pa.water.usgs.gov/reports/wrir03-4123.pdf.
35. Leonard B. A stable and accurate convection modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1979, 19:59-98.
36. Marcus W., Kearney M. Upland and coastal sediment sources in a Chesapeake Bay Estuary. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1991, 81(3):408-424.
37. Newell R. Ecological changes in Chesapeake Bay: are they the result of overharvesting the American oyster (Crassostrea virginica)?. Understanding the Estuary - Advances in Chesapeake Bay Research 1988, 536-546. Chesapeake Research Consortium, Baltimore, MD, Publication 129. M. Lynch, E. Krome (Eds.).
38. Nichols M., Kim S., Brouwer C. " Sediment Characterization of the Chesapeake Bay and Its Tributaries," NOAA National Estuarine Inventory 1991, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Pt, VA.
39. Officer C., Nichols M. Box model application to a study of suspended sediment distribution and fluxes in partially-mixed estuaries. Estuarine Perspectives 1980, 329-340. Academic Press, New York. V. Kennedy (Ed.).
40. Orth R.J., Moore K. Chesapeake Bay: an unprecedented decline in submerged aquatic vegetation. Science 1983, 222:51-53.
41. Passow U. Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in aquatic environments. Progress in Oceanography 2002, 55:287-333.
42. Sanford L., Panageotou W., Halka J. Tidal resuspension of sediments in northern Chesapeake Bay. Marine Geology 1991, 97(1-2):87-103.
43. Sanford L., Halka J. Assessing the paradigm of mutually exclusive erosion and deposition of mud, with examples from upper Chesapeake Bay. Marine Geology 1993, 114:37-57.
44. Sanford L., Maa J. A unified erosion formula for fine sediments. Marine Geology 2001, 179:9-23.
45. Sanford L.P., Suttles S.E., Halka J.P. Reconsidering the physics of the Chesapeake Bay estuarine turbidity maximum. Estuaries 2001, 24(5):655-669.
46. Schubel J. Turbidity maximum of the northern Chesapeake Bay. Science 1968, 161:1013-1015.
47. Schubel J., Carter H. Suspended sediment budget for Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine Processes 1976, vol. II:48-62. Academic Press, New York. M. Wiley (Ed.).
48. Skrabal S. Clay mineral distributions and source discrimination of upper quaternary sediments, lower Chesapeake Bay, Virginia. Estuaries 1991, 14(1):29-37.
49. Testa J., Kemp W.M. Variability of biogeochemical processes and physical transport in a partially stratified estuary: a box modeling analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2008, 356:63-79.
50. Twilley R., Kemp W., Staver K., Stevenson J., Boynton W. Nutrient enrichment of estuarine submersed vascular plant communities. 1. Algal growth and effects on production of plants and associated communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1985, 23:179-191.
51. United States Environmental Protection Agency Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophyll a for the Chesapeake Bay and its Tidal Tributaries 2008, EPA 903-R-08-001, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, MD, Available from:. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/content/publications/cbp_47637.pdf.
52. United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Phase 5.3 Community Watershed Model 2010, EPA Report 903S10002, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, MD, Available from:. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/model_phase5.aspx%3Fmenuitem%3D26169.
53. Warner J., Sherwood C., Signell R., Harris C., Arango H. Development of a three-dimensional, regional, coupled wave, current, and sediment transport model. Computers & Geosciences 2008, 34:1284-1306.
54. Ward L., Kemp W., Boynton W. The influence of waves and seagrass communities on suspended particulate matter in an estuarine embayment. Marine Geology 1984, 59:85-103.
55. Wright L.D., Boon J., Xu J., Kim S.-C. The bottom boundary layer of the bay stem plains environment of lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 1992, 35(1):17-36.
56. Young I., Verhagen L. The growth of fetch limited waves in water of finite depth. Part 1. Total energy and peak frequency. Coastal Engineering 1996, 29:47-78.