Organizational strategy and research productivity: A comparison of two academic institutions

Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 159-165

  Cadez, Simon ^a   Dimovski, Vlado ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Academic institutions.; Bibliometric method; Organizational culture; Organizational strategy; Research productivity

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS; BIBLIOMETRIC; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURES; ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLISHING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84872661763     PISSN: 20488963     EISSN: 20488971     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Pugini, F. (2008) The measurement of Italian universities' research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology, Scientometrics, 76, pp. 225-244.
2. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A. (2009) A decision support system for public research organizations participating in national research assessment exercises, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, pp. 2095-2106.
3. Arnold, I. (2008) Course Level and the Relationship between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness, Journal of Economic Education, pp. 307-321.
4. Biehl, M., Kim, H., Wade, M. (2006) Relationships among the academic business disciplines: a multi-method citation analysis, Omega, 34, pp. 359-371.
5. Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., Simar, L. (2006) Advanced indicators of productivity of universities. An application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data, Scientometrics, 66, pp. 389-410.
6. Bonner, S. E., Hesford, J. W., Van der Stede, W. A. (2006) The most influential journals in academic accounting, Accounting, organizations and society, 31, pp. 663-685.
7. Colyvas J., Crow M., Gelijns A. (2002) How do university inventions get into practice, Management Science, 48, pp. 61-72.
8. David, C. (2006) Universities as key knowledge infrastructures in regional innovation systems, Innovation, 16, pp. 117-130.
9. Gendron, Y. (2008) Constituting the academic performer: the spectre of superficiality and stagnation in academia, European Accounting Review, 17, pp. 97-128.
10. Geuna, A., Martin, B. R. (2003) University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison, Minerva, 41, pp. 277-304.
11. Horrobin, D. F. (1990) The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation, Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, pp. 1438-1441.
12. Lanciano-Morandat, C., Nohara, H., Verdier, E. (2006) Higher education systems and industrial innovation: an interactive analysis involving actors, Organizations and societal conventions, Innovation, 19, pp. 79-93.
13. Lindsay, R., Breen, R., Jenkins, A. (2002) Academic Research and Teaching Quality: the views of undergraduate and postgraduate students, Studies in Higher Education, 27, pp. 309-327.
14. Long, R., Crawford, A., White, M., Davis, K. (2009) Determinants of faculty research productivity in information systems: An empirical analysis of the impact of academic origin and academic affiliation, Scientometrics, 78, pp. 231-260.
15. Moed H. F. (2008) UK Research Assessment Exercises: informed judgements on research quality or quantity?, Scientometrics, 74, pp. 153-161.
16. Moxham, H., Anderson, J. (1992) Peer review. A view from the inside, Science and Technology Policy, pp. 7-15.
17. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995) The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, New York, Oxford University Press.
18. Reidpath, D., Allotey, P. (2010) Can national research assessment exercises be used locally to inform research strategy development? The description of a methodological approach to the UK RAE 2008 results with a focus on one institution, Higher Education, 59, 785-798.
19. Tian, J., Nakamoru, Y., Wierzbicki A.P. (2009) Knowledge management and knowledge creation in academia: a study based on surveys in a Japanese research university, Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, pp. 76-92.
20. Van Looy, B., Callaert, J., Debackere, K. (2006) Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing?, Research Policy, 35, pp. 596-608.
21. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005) Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods, Scientometrics, 62, pp. 133-143.