Estimating the causal effect of fertility on economic wellbeing: Data requirements, identifying assumptions and estimation methods

Empirical Economics

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 355-385

  Arpino, Bruno ^a   Aassve, Arnstein ^a  

^a BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Causal inference; Fertility; Instrumental variables; Poverty; Unconfoundedness; VLSMS

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; ECONOMETRICS; ESTIMATION METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; PANEL DATA; POLICY ANALYSIS; POVERTY;

EID: 84872657233     PISSN: 03777332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-010-0356-9     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aakvik A (2001) Bounding a matching estimator: the case of a Norwegian training program. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 63(1): 115-143.
2. Aassve A, Betti G, Mazzuco S, Mencarini L (2007) Marital disruption and economic well-being: a comparative analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A 170(3): 781-799.
3. Abadie A, Imbens GW (2002) Simple and bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. NBER working paper T0283.
4. Abadie A, Imbens GW (2004) On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. NBER working paper T0325.
5. Abadie A, Drukker D, Leber Herr J, Imbens GW (2004) Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in stata. Stata J 4(3): 290-311.
6. Admassie A (2002) Explaining the high incidence of child labour in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr Dev Rev 14(2): 251-275.
7. Angrist JD, Evans WN (1998) Children and their parents' labor supply: evidence from exogenous variation in family size. Am Econ Rev 88(3): 450-477.
8. Angrist JD, Krueger A (1991) Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings?. Quart J Econ 106: 979-1014.
9. Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc 91: 444-472.
10. Anh DN, Thang NM (2002) Accessibility and use of contraceptives in Vietnam. Int Fam Plann Perspect 28(4): 214-219.
11. Arpino B, Aassve A (2007) Estimation of causal effects of fertility on economic wellbeing: evidence from rural Vietnam. ISER working paper 2007-24. University of Essex, Colchester.
12. Athey S, Imbens GW (2006) Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica 74(2): 431-497.
13. Becker SO, Ichino A (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. STATA J 2: 358-377.
14. Becker GS, Lewis HG (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 81(2): S279-S288.
15. Belanger D (2002) Son preference in a rural village in North Vietnam. Stud Fam Plann 33(4): 321-334.
16. Blundell R, Dearden L, Sianesi B (2005) Evaluating the impact of education on earnings in the UK: models, methods and results from the NCDS. J R Stat Soc Ser A 168(3): 473-512.
17. Bryson A, Dorsett R, Purdon S (2002) The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of labour market policies. Working paper no. 4, Department for Work and Pensions.
18. Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2005) Some pratical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. IZA discussion paper no. 1588.
19. Card D (1995) Using geographic variation in college proximity to estimate the return to schooling. In: Christofides L, Grant E, Swidinsky R (eds) Aspects of labor market behaviour: essays in honour of John Vanderkamp. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 201-222.
20. Card D, Krueger BA (1994) Minimum wages and employment: a case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Am Econ Rev 84: 772-793.
21. Chun H, Oh J (2002) An instrumental variable estimate of the effect of fertility on the labour force participation of married women. Appl Econ Lett 9: 631-634.
22. Costa Dias M, Ichimura H, van den Berg GJ (2008) The matching method for treatment evaluation with selective participation and ineligibles. IZA discussion paper no. 3280.
23. Coudouel A, Hentschel J, Wodon Q (2002) Poverty measurement and analysis, poverty reduction strategy paper sourcebook, World Bank, Washington D. C. regressors. J Econom 124: 335-361.
24. Dawid AP (1979) Conditional independence in statistical theory. J R Stat Soc Ser B 41: 1-31.
25. Deaton A, Zaidi S (2002) Guidelines for constructing consumption aggregates for welfare analysis. Living standards measurement study working paper no. 135, The World Bank.
26. Dehejia R, Wahba S (1999) Causal effects in non-experimental studies: re-evaluating the evaluation of training programs. J Am Stat Assoc 94(448): 1053-1062.
27. Duy LV, Haughton D, Haughton J, Kiem DA, Ky LD (2001) Fertility decline. In: Haughton D, Haughton J, Phong N (eds) Living standards during an economic boom. Vietnam 1993-1998. Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.
28. Easterlin RA, Crimmins EM (1985) The fertility revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
29. Ermisch J (1989) Purchased child care, optimal family size and mother's employment: theory and econometric analysis. J Popul Econ 2: 79-102.
30. Frölich M (2007) Non parametric IV estimation of local average treatment effects with covariates. J Econom 139: 35-75.
31. Glewwe P, Gragnolati M, Zaman H (2002) Who gained from Vietnam's boom in the 1990s?. Econ Dev Cult Change 50(4): 773-792.
32. Goodman A, Sianesi B (2005) Early education and children's outcomes: how long the impacts last. Fisc Stud 26(4).
33. Gupta ND, Dubey A (2003) Poverty and fertility: an instrumental variables analysis on Indian micro data. Working paper 03-11, Aarhus School of Business.
34. Hardle W, Linton O (1994) Applied nonparametric methods. In: Engle RF, McFadden D (eds) Handbook of econometrics, vol 4. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 391-448.
35. Haughton J, Haughton D (1995) Son preference in Vietnam. Stud Fam Plann 26(6): 325-337.
36. Heckman JJ (1997) Instrumental variables: a study of implicit behavioural assumptions used in making program evaluations. J Hum Resour 32: 441-462.
37. Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd P (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev Econ Stud 65: 261-294.
38. Ichino A, Mealli F, Nannicini T (2008) From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: what can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity?. J Appl Econom 23(3): 305-327.
39. Imbens GW (2003) Sensitivity to exogeneity assumptions in program evaluation. AEA Pap Proc 93(2): 126-132.
40. Imbens G (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Rev Econ Stat 86: 4-30.
41. Imbens GW, Angrist JD (1994) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62: 467-475.
42. Johansson A (1996) Family planning in Vietnam-women's experiences and dilemma: a community study from the Red River Delta. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 17: 59-67.
43. Johansson A (1998) Population policy, son preference and the use of IUDs in North Vietnam. Reprod Health Matters 6: 66-76.
44. Manski CF (1990) Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 80: 319-323.
45. McClellan M, McNeil BJ, Newhouse JP (1994) Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality?. J Am Med Assoc 272(11): 859-866.
46. Moav O (2005) Cheap children and the persistence of poverty. Econ J 115: 88-110.
47. Molini V (2006) Food security in Vietnam during the 1990s-the empirical evidence. Reaserch paper no. 2006/67, United Nation University.
48. Nannicini T (2007) Simulation-based sensitivity analysis for matching estimators. Stata J 7(3): 334-350.
49. Neyman J [1990(1923)] On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: essay on principles, section 9. Transl Stat Sci 5(4): 465-480.
50. Nguyen-Dinh H (1997) A socioeconomic analysis of the determinants of fertility: the case of Vietnam. J Popul Econ 10(3): 251-271.
51. Rosenbaum PR (1984) The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. J R Stat Soc Ser A 147: 656-666.
52. Rosenbaum PR (1987) The role of a second control group in an observational study. Stat Sci (with discussion) 2(3): 292-316.
53. Rosenbaum PR (1987b) Sensitivity analysis to certain permutation inferences in matched observational studies. Biometrika 74(1): 13-26.
54. Rosenbaum PR (2002) Observational studies. Springer, New York.
55. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983a) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70: 41-55.
56. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983b) Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. J R Stat Soc Ser B 45: 212-218.
57. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat 39(1): 33-38.
58. Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 66: 688-701.
59. Rubin DB (1978) Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Ann Stat 6: 34-58.
60. Rubin DB (1980) Discussion of randomization analysis of experimental data: the fisher randomization test by D. Basu. J Am Stat Assoc 75: 591-593.
61. Schoumaker B, Tabutin D (1999) Relationship between poverty and fertility in Southern countries: knowledge, methodology and cases. Working paper no. 2, Department of Science of Population and Development, Université Catholique de Louvain.
62. Scornet C (2007) 1963-2003: Quarante ans de planification familiale au Viêt-Nam. In: Adjamagbo A, Msellati P, Vimard P (eds) Santé de la reproduction et fécondité dans les pays du Sud. Nouveaux contextes et nouveaux comportements. Academia Bruylant, Louvain la Neuve, pp 142-171.
63. Smith J (2000) A critical survey of empirical methods for evaluating active labor market policies. Schweiz Z Volkswirtsch Stat 136(3): 1-22.
64. Smith JA, Todd P (2005) Does matching overcome Lalonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?. J Econom 125: 305-353.
65. Staiger D, Stock J (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3): 557-586.
66. Tung PD (2004) Poverty line, poverty measurement, monitoring and assessment of MDG in Viet Nam. Report presented at the "2004 international conference on offical poverty statistics-methodology and comparability", Manila October 2004.
67. Willis RJ (1973) A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. J Polit Econ 81(2, part 2): S14-S64.
68. Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric Analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge.
69. Zhao Z (2005) Sensitivity of propensity score methods to the specifications. IZA discussion paper no. 1873.