Family planning in Vietnam - Women's experiences and dilemma: A community study from the Red River Delta

Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 59-67

  Johansson, A ^a   Hoa, H T ^b   Nham Tuyet, L T ^c   Bich, M H ^d   Hojer B ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b Dept Hyg Environ and Epidemiol   (Viet Nam)

^c Rescarch Ctr Gender Fam E   (Viet Nam)

^d Social Science Commission ^*  (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

Family planning; Intrauterine devices; Psychosomatic effects; Vietnam; Women's experience

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOSOMATIC DISORDER; VIET NAM;

EID: 0029863495     PISSN: 0167482X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/01674829609025665     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Preliminary results of the 1993 Demographic and Family Planning Survey. Quoted in Vu Qui Nhan. Recent development in population policy in Vietnam. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Meeting of the Association for Asian Studies, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 1994.
2. Resolution no. 4 on population and family planning policies. Adopted by the 4th session of the Party Central Committee. Hanoi 14 January 1993.
3. Vu Qui Nhan. History of family planning in Vietnam. Vietnam Soc Sci Rev 1994;39(1):3-10.
4. Council of Ministers Decision 162 (Oct. 1988) Concerning a number of population and family planning policies in Vietnam. Translation reprinted in Pop Dev Rev 1989;15(1):169-72.
5. National Committee for Population and Family Planning Vietnam Demographic and Health Survey 1988. Hanoi 1990.
6. Goodkind D. Abortion in Vietnam: measurements. puzzles and concerns. Stud Family Plan 1994; 26(6):342-52.
7. Mai Huy Bich. A distinctive feature of the meaning of reproduction in the Confucian family in the Red River Delta. In: Tuong Lai and R. Liljeström eds. Sociological Studies on the Vietnamese Family. Hanoi: Social Science Publishing House, 1991: 49-56.
8. Mai Huy Bich. Reproduction, modernisation and role conflict of Vietnamese women. Paper presented at the Nordic Sociology Congress, Helsinki 1995.
9. Vuong Xuan Tinh. The need for sons; problems and solutions. Vietnam Soc Sci Rev 1993;39(1):25-8.
10. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research; Grounded theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage, 1990.
11. Bryman A. Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd, 1988.
12. Traditional medicine. Vietnamese Studies No. 50. Hanoi: Foreign Language Publishing House, 1984.
13. Vietnam Population Census 1989. Detailed analysis of sample results. Hanoi: General Statistics Office, 1992.
14. Johannson A, Nham Tuyet LT, Lap NT, Sundström K. Abortion in context: a study of induced abortions in two villages in Thai Binh province, Vietnam. Int Fam Plann Persp, in press.
15. Statistical Office, Thai Binh Committee for Population and Family Planning, Thai Binh, Vietnam 1992.
16. Goodkind D. Abortion in Vietnam: measurements, puzzles and concerns. Studies in Family Planning 1994;25:342-52.
17. National Committee for Population and Family Planning. Vietnam Demographic and Health Survey 1988. Hanoi, 1990.
18. Robey B, Rutstein S, Morris L, Blackburn R. The reproductive revolution: New survey findings. Population Reports Series M, no 11. Baltimore Johns Hopkins School of Public Health Population Information Programme, Dec 1992.
19. Jain S, Kornfield R, Lecomte J, Guzman P Thematic evaluation of quality of family planning services in Vietnam. UNFPA Report New York: UNFPA, 1993.
20. Do Trong Hieu, Stoeckel J, Nguyen Van Thi. Pregnancy termination and contraceptive failure in Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Popul J 1994;8(4):3-18.
21. Leong Wai Ping, Nguyen Thi My Huong, Duong Thi Cuong, Le Diem. A prospective study of TCU 380A IUD in Vietnamese women. Hanoi: Institute for the Protection of Mothers and Newborns; 1994.
22. Rowe P. Study of SSR/CuT efficacy, use cost benefit and conversion. UNFPA Project CPR/91/P43. Review of clinical, demographic and epidemiological data on SSR and CuT efficacy. WHO/HRP UNFPA Report New York: UNFPA, 1994.
23. Pariani S, Heer DM, Van Arsdol D. Does choice make a difference to contraceptive use? Evidences from East Java. Stud Fam Plan 1991;22,6:384-90.
24. Kleinman A. Social Origins of Distress and Disease. Depression, Neurasthenia and Pain in Modern China. Yale University Press, 1986.