For Methodological Pluralism: A Reply to Brady and Elman

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 278-285

  Goertz, Gary ^a   Mahoney, James ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872655726     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414012466380     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Braumoeller B.Causal complexity and the study of politics.Political Analysis. 2003;11:209-233.
2. Clark W. R.,Gilligan M. J.,Golder M.A simple multivariate test for asymmetric hypotheses.Political Analysis. 2006;14 (3): 311-331.
3. Collier D.Understanding process tracing.PS: Political Science & Politics. 2011;44:823-830.
4. Cornes R.,Sandler T.The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. 1996). The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
5. Eliason S.,Stryker R.Goodness-of-fit tests and descriptive measures in fuzzy-set analysis.Sociological Methods and Research. 2009;38:102-146.
6. Goertz G.International norms and decision making: A punctuated equilibrium model. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2003:.
7. Goertz G.Constraints, compromises, and decision making.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2004;48 (1): 14-38.
8. Goertz G.Social science concepts: A user's guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005:.
9. Goertz G.,Hak T.,Dul J.Ceilings and floors: Where are there no observations?.Sociological Methods and Research. in press;:.
10. Hohn F. E.Applied Boolean algebra: An elementary introduction. 1966). Applied Boolean algebra: An elementary introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.New York, NY: Macmillan; 1966:.
11. King G.,Keohane R.,Verba S.Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994:.
12. Kingdon J.Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 1984:.
13. Lewin D.,Protheroe D.Design of logic systems. 1992). Design of logic systems (2nd ed.). London, UK: Chapman and Hall.London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1992:.
14. Mahoney J.Toward a unified theory of causality.Comparative Political Studies. 2008;41 (4/5): 412-436.
15. Mahoney J.The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences.Sociological Methods and Research. 2012;41:560-590.
16. McCluskey E. J.Introduction to the theory of switching circuits. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965:.
17. Ostrom E.Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991:.
18. Schneider C. Q.,Rohlfing I.Does set-relational causation fit into a potential outcomes framework? An assessment of Gerring's proposal.Qualitative and Multi-Method Research. 2012;10 (1): 8-14.
19. ZaksS. (2011). Relationships among rivals: Analyzing contending hypotheses with a new logic of process tracing. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Davis.