Feasibility of a wiki as a participatory tool for patients in clinical guideline development

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Den Breejen, Elvira M E ^a   Nelen, Willianne L D M ^a   Knijnenburg, Jose M L ^b   Burgers, Jako S ^c   Hermens, Rosella P M G ^a   Kremer, Jan A M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Dutch patient association for people with fertility problems Freya   (Netherlands)

^c DUTCH COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Guideline development; Infertility; Patient participation; Web 2.0; Wiki

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; INTERNET; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; INTERNET; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84872481452     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2080     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Nilsen E, Myrhaug H, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman A. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006(3):CD004563. [doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004563.pub2] [Medline: 16856050].
2. Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. In: Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, editors. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
3. van Wersch A, Eccles M. Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Qual Health Care 2001 Mar;10(1):10-16 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 11239138].
4. Crawford M, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ 2002 Nov 30;325(7375):1263. [Medline: 12458240].
5. Burgers J, Fervers B, Haugh M, Brouwers M, Browman G, Philip T, et al. International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument. J Clin Oncol 2004 May 15;22(10):2000-2007. [doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.157] [Medline: 15143093].
6. Bastian H. Raising the standard: practice guidelines and consumer participation. Int J Qual Health Care 1996 Oct;8(5):485-490 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 9117202].
7. Gagliardi A, Brouwers M, Palda V, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw J. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci 2011;6:26 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-26] [Medline: 21426574].
8. AGREE Enterprise. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE Instrument) URL: http://www.agreetrust.org/mod-sys/errors/error.html? aspxerrorpath=/index.aspx [accessed 2012-02-16] [WebCite Cache ID 65UXoyUUk].
9. Schünemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:22 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-22] [Medline: 17147811].
10. Rogers W. Are guidelines ethical? Some considerations for general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2002 Aug;52(481):663-668. [Medline: 12171228].
11. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2009 Apr 03. The Guidelines Manual 2009 URL: http://www. nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/ developingniceclinicalguidelines/clinicalguidelinedevelopmentmethods/ GuidelinesManual2009.jsp [accessed 2012-10-01] [WebCite Cache ID 6B5JzkRSR].
12. Healthcare Improvement Scotland. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). 2011 Nov. SIGN 50: A Guideline Developer's Handbook, Revised Edition URL: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign50.pdf [accessed 2012-02-16] [WebCite Cache ID 65UY1tSVw].
13. Díaz Del Campo P, Gracia J, Blasco J, Andradas E. A strategy for patient involvement in clinical practice guidelines: methodological approaches. BMJ Qual Saf 2011 Sep;20(9):779-784. [doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049031] [Medline: 21460393].
14. Légaré F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T, Pakenham C, Burgers J, Légaré J, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Med Decis Making 2011;31(6):E45-E74. [doi: 10.1177/0272989X11424401] [Medline: 21959267].
15. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B, Gracia J, James M, Marshall C, G-I-N PUBLIC. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care 2010 Oct;19(5):e22. [doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.034835] [Medline: 20427302].
16. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA 2008 Jul 23;300(4):436-438. [doi: 10.1001/jama.300.4. 436] [Medline: 18647988].
17. Cross M. How the internet is changing health care. BMJ 2008;337:A883. [Medline: 18647776].
18. Giustini D. How Web 2.0 is changing medicine. BMJ 2006 Dec 23;333(7582):1283-1284. [doi: 10.1136/bmj.39062.555405.80] [Medline: 17185707].
19. Heilman J, Kemmann E, Bonert M, Chatterjee A, Ragar B, Beards G, et al. Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(1):e14 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1589] [Medline: 21282098].
20. Trevena L. WikiProject medicine. BMJ 2011;342:d3387. [Medline: 21653617].
21. Haagen E, Tuil W, Hendriks J, de Bruijn R, Braat D, Kremer J. Current Internet use and preferences of IVF and ICSI patients. Hum Reprod 2003 Oct;18(10):2073-2078 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 14507823].
22. Weissman A, Gotlieb L, Ward S, Greenblatt E, Casper R. Use of the internet by infertile couples. Fertil Steril 2000 Jun;73(6):1179-1182. [Medline: 10856479].
23. Wischmann T. Implications of psychosocial support in infertility-a critical appraisal. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2008 Jun;29(2):83-90. [doi: 10.1080/01674820701817870] [Medline: 18484439].
24. Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges J, Freundl G. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod 2005 May;20(5):1144-1147 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh870] [Medline: 15802321].
25. Taylor A. ABC of subfertility: extent of the problem. BMJ 2003 Aug 23;327(7412):434-436. [doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7412.434] [Medline: 12933733].
26. Nachtigall R. International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril 2006 Apr;85(4):871-875. [doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005. 08.066] [Medline: 16580367].
27. UMC St Radboud. 2008. FreyaWIKI URL: https://www.freyawiki.nl/[accessed 2012-02-16] [WebCite Cache ID 65UYXww7d].
28. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson G, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology, World Health Organization. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 2009 Nov;92(5):1520-1524. [doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009] [Medline: 19828144].
29. Dancet E, Nelen W, Sermeus W, De Leeuw L, Kremer J, D'Hooghe T. The patients' perspective on fertility care: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16(5):467-487 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq004] [Medline: 20223789].
30. Shiffman R, Dixon J, Brandt C, Essaihi A, Hsiao A, Michel G, et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005;5:23 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-23] [Medline: 16048653].
31. Arain M, Campbell M, Cooper C, Lancaster G. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:67 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67] [Medline: 20637084].
32. Yusof M, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A, Stergioulas L. An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). Int J Med Inform 2008 Jun;77(6):386-398. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011] [Medline: 17964851].
33. Francis J, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles M, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-1245. [doi: 10.1080/08870440903194015] [Medline: 20204937].
34. Silverman D. Doing Qualitative Research. 3rd edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2009.
35. Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, Badenoch D, Straus S, Haynes B, et al. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. 2009 Mar. Levels of Evidence URL: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=4590 [accessed 2012-06-21] [WebCite Cache ID 68aRCTclX].
36. Jalali A, Mioduszewski M, Gauthier M, Varpio L. Wiki use and challenges in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 2009 Nov;43(11):1117. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03480.x] [Medline: 19874526].
37. Naik A, Singh H. Electronic health records to coordinate decision making for complex patients: what can we learn from wiki? Med Decis Making 2010;30(6):722-731. [doi: 10.1177/0272989X10385846] [Medline: 21183759].
38. Archambault P, Légaré F, Lavoie A, Gagnon M, Lapointe J, St-Jacques S, et al. Healthcare professionals' intentions to use wiki-based reminders to promote best practices in trauma care: a survey protocol. Implement Sci 2010;5:45 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-45] [Medline: 20540775].
39. Gupta S, Wan F, Newton D, Bhattacharyya O, Chignell M, Straus S. WikiBuild: a new online collaboration process for multistakeholder tool development and consensus building. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e108 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1833] [Medline: 22155694].
40. Archambault P. WikiBuild: a new application to support patient and health care professional involvement in the development of patient support tools. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e114 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1961] [Medline: 22155746].
41. Hansen D. Knowledge Sharing, Maintenance, and Use in Online Support Communities [doctoral dissertation]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan; 2007. URL: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57608/2/shakmatt-1. pdf [accessed 2012-06-21] [WebCite Cache ID 68aQHFxWs].
42. Pope C, van Royen P, Baker R. Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality. Qual Saf Health Care 2002 Jun;11(2):148-152 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12448807].
43. Kummervold P, Chronaki C, Lausen B, Prokosch H, Rasmussen J, Santana S, et al. eHealth trends in Europe 2005-2007: a population-based survey. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(4):e42 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1023] [Medline: 19017584].
44. Spyridakis J. Guidelines for authoring comprehensible Web pages and evaluating their success. Tech Commun 2000 Aug 01;47(3):359-382 [FREE Full text] [WebCite Cache].
45. Gustafson D, Wyatt J. Evaluation of ehealth systems and services. BMJ 2004 May 15;328(7449):1150. [doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1150] [Medline: 15142895].
46. Kushniruk A. Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering. Comput Biol Med 2002 May;32(3):141-149. [Medline: 11922931].
47. Taylor H, Sullivan D, Mullen C, Johnson C. Implementation of a user-centered framework in the development of a web-based health information database and call center. J Biomed Inform 2011 Oct;44(5):897-908. [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.03.001] [Medline: 21396486].
48. Roehrer E, Cummings E, Ellis L, Turner P. The role of user-centred design within online community development. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;164:256-260. [Medline: 21335720].
49. Archambault P, van de Belt T, Grajales F, Eysenbach G, Aubin K, Gold I, et al. Wikis and collaborative writing applications in health care: a scoping review protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 2012;1(1):e1. [doi: 10.2196/resprot.1993].
50. Brandes M, Hamilton C, Bergevoet K, de Bruin J, Nelen W, Kremer J. Origin of multiple pregnancies in a subfertile population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010 Sep;89(9):1149-1154. [doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.498495] [Medline: 20804340].
51. Atkinson N, Saperstein S, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(1):e4 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1035] [Medline: 19275980].
52. Baker L, Wagner T, Singer S, Bundorf M. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 2003 May 14;289(18):2400-2406. [doi: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2400] [Medline: 12746364].
53. Cotten S, Gupta S. Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med 2004 Nov;59(9):1795-1806. [doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.020] [Medline: 15312915].
54. Andreassen H, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Chronaki C, Dumitru R, Pudule I, Santana S, et al. European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health 2007;7:53 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-53] [Medline: 17425798].
55. Karunanithi M. Monitoring technology for the elderly patient. Expert Rev Med Devices 2007 Mar;4(2):267-277. [doi: 10.1586/17434440.4.2.267] [Medline: 17359231].
56. Gagnon M, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst 2012 Feb;36(1):241-277. [doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4] [Medline: 20703721].
57. Chhanabhai P, Holt A. Consumers are ready to accept the transition to online and electronic records if they can be assured of the security measures. MedGenMed 2007;9(1):8 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 17435617].
58. Gagnon M, Shaw N, Sicotte C, Mathieu L, Leduc Y, Duplantie J, et al. Users' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing EHR in Canada: a study protocol. Implement Sci 2009;4:20 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-20] [Medline: 19358739].