Effect of matrix on cardiomyocyte viscoelastic properties in 2D culture

MCB Molecular and Cellular Biomechanics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 227-249

  Deitch, Sandra ^a   Gao, Bruce Z ^a   Dean, Delphine ^a  

^a Clemson University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIAC CELL; CARDIOMYOCYTES; CELL-TO-CELL VARIABILITY; CELLULAR STRUCTURE; COLLAGEN MATRICES; CULTURE SYSTEMS; DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES; FORCE CURVE; HERTZ MODEL; MATRIX COMPOSITION; MODEL FIT; NEONATAL RAT CARDIOMYOCYTES; QUASI-LINEAR; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; RELAXATION MEASUREMENTS; STANDARD LINEAR SOLID MODELS; STRESS RELAXATION DATA; STRESS-RELAXATION CURVES; SUBSTRATE COMPOSITION; VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOMECHANICS; CELLS; COLLAGEN; CURVE FITTING; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; STRESS RELAXATION; SUBSTRATES;

CELL CULTURE;

RATTUS;

COLLAGEN; FIBRONECTIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CULTURE; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; ELASTICITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HEART MUSCLE CELL; METABOLISM; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; COLLAGEN; ELASTICITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBRONECTINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MYOCYTES, CARDIAC; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84872473990     PISSN: 15565297     EISSN: 15565300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Walker CA & Spinale FG (1999) The structure and function of the cardiac myocyte: A review of fundamental concepts. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 118(2):375-382. (Pubitemid 29360345)
2. Louch WE, Sheehan KA, & Wolska BM (2011) Methods in cardiomyocyte isolation, culture, and gene transfer. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Car diology 51(3):288-298.
3. Miner EC & Miller WL (2006) A look between the cardiomyocytes: The extracellular matrix in heart failure. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 81(1):71-76. (Pubitemid 43054320)
4. VanWinkle WB, Snuggs MB, & Buja LM (1996) Cardiogel: A biosynthetic extracellular matrix for cardiomyocyte culture. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Animal 32(8):478-485. (Pubitemid 26418604)
5. Borg TK, McFaddenWA, Hastings JF, Goodwin RP, & Goldsmith EC (2003) The role of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in cardiac development. Faseb Journal 17(4):A359-A359.
6. Simpson DG, et al. (1994) Modulation of cardiac myocyte phenotype invitro by the composition and orientation of the extracellular-matrix. Journal of Cellular Physiology 161(1):89-105. (Pubitemid 24315654)
7. Bullard TA, Borg TK, & Price RL (2005) The expression and role of protein kinase C in neonatal cardiac myocyte attachment, cell volume, and myofibril formation is dependent on the composition of the extracellular matrix. Microscopy and Microanalysis 11(3):224-234.
8. Bick RJ, Snuggs MB, Poindexter BJ, Buja LM, & Van Winkle WB (1998) Physical, contractile and calcium handling properties of neonatal cardiac myocytes cultured on different matrices. Cell Adhesion and Communication 6(4):301-+.
9. McDevitt TC, et al. (2002) In vitro generation of differentiated cardiac myofibers on micropatterned laminin surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 60(3):472-479.
10. Lieberman M, Johnson EA, Roggevee.Ae, & Purdy JE (1972) Synthetic strands of cardiac muscle - growth and physiological implication. Science 175(4024):909-&.
11. Rohr S, Scholly DM, & Kleber AG (1991) Patterned growth of neonatal rat heart cells in culture - morphological and electrophysiological characterization. Circulation Research 68(1):114-130.
12. Thomas SP, et al. (2000) Synthetic strands of neonatal mouse cardiac myocytes - Structural and electrophysiological properties. Circulation Research 87(6):467-473.
13. Azeloglu EU & Costa KD (2010) Cross-bridge cycling gives rise to spatiotemporal heterogeneity of dynamic subcellular mechanics in cardiac myocytes probed with atomic force microscopy. American Journal of Physiology- Heart and Circulatory Physiology 298(3):H853-H860.
14. Deitch S, Kunkle C, Cui X, Boland T, & Dean D (2008) Collagen matrix alignment using inkjet printer technology. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 1094.
15. Costa KD (2003) Single-cell elastography: probing for disease with the atomic force microscope. Disease Markers 19(2-3):139-154. (Pubitemid 38530358)
16. Darling EM, Zauscher S, Block JA, & Guilak F (2007) A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: Do cell properties reflect metastatic potential? Biophysical Journal 92(5):1784-1791. (Pubitemid 46393489)
17. Darling EM, Zauscher S, & Guilak F (2006) Viscoelastic properties of zonal articular chondrocytes measured by atomic force microscopy. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 14(6):571-579.
18. Okajima T, et al. (2007) Stress relaxation of HepG2 cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 18(8).
19. Hemmer JD, et al. (2009) Role of cytoskeletal components in stress-relaxation behavior of adherent vascular smooth muscle cells. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme 131(4):9.
20. Charras GT & Horton MA (2002) Single cell mechanotransduction and its modulation analyzed by atomic force microscope indentation. Biophysical Journal 82(6):2970-2981. (Pubitemid 34547640)
21. Hemmer JD, Dean D, Vertegel A, Langan E, & LaBerge M (2008) Effects of serum deprivation on the mechanical properties of adherent vascular smooth muscle cells. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H-Journal of Engineering in Medicine 222(H5):761-772.
22. Jaasma MJ, Jackson WM, & Keaveny TM (2006) Measurement and characterization of whole-cell mechanical behavior. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 34(5):748-758. (Pubitemid 43824024)
23. Jones WR, et al. (1999) Alterations in the Young's modulus and volumetric properties of chondrocytes isolated from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. Journal of Biomechanics 32(2):119-127. (Pubitemid 29062274)
24. Mahaffy RE, Shih CK, MacKintosh FC, & Kas J (2000) Scanning probebased frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells. Physical Review Letters 85(4):880-883.
25. Sato M, Theret DP, Wheeler LT, Ohshima N, & Nerem RM (1990) Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelstic properties. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering- Transactions of the Asme 112(3):263-268. (Pubitemid 20378625)
26. Jaasma MJ, Jackson WM, & Keaveny TM (2006) The effects of morphology, confluency, and phenotype on whole-cell mechanical behavior. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 34(5):759-768. (Pubitemid 43824025)
27. Lieber SC, et al. (2004) Aging increases stiffness of cardiac myocytes measured by atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 287(2):H645-H651. (Pubitemid 38955295)
28. Mathur AB, Collinsworth AM, Reichert WM, Kraus WE, & Truskey GA (2001) Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. Journal of Biomechanics 34(12):1545-1553. (Pubitemid 33041370)
29. Hofmann UG, Rotsch C, Parak WJ, & Radmacher M (1997) Investigating the cytoskeleton of chicken cardiocytes with the atomic force microscope. Journal of Structural Biology 119(2):84-91. (Pubitemid 27325781)
30. Shroff SG, Saner DR, & Lal R (1995) Dynamic micromechanical properties of cultured rat atrial myocytes measured by atomic-force microscopy. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 269(1):C286-C292.
31. Borg TK, Rubin K, Lundgren E, Borg K, & Obrink B (1984) Recognition of extracellular-matrix components by neonatal and adult cardiac myocytes. Developmental Biology 104(1):86-96.
32. Walsh KB, Sweet JK, Parks GE, & Long KJ (2001) Modulation of outward potassium currents in aligned cultures of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes during phorbol ester-induced hypertrophy. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 33(6):1233-1247. (Pubitemid 32579288)
33. Dimitriadis EK, Horkay F, Maresca J, Kachar B, & Chadwick RS (2002) Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. Biophysical Journal 82(5):2798-2810. (Pubitemid 34441316)
34. Mahaffy RE, Park S, Gerde E, Kas J, & Shih CK (2004) Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. Biophysical Journal 86(3):1777-1793. (Pubitemid 38295611)
35. Fung YC (2004) Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues (Springer Science and Business Media, New York) 2nd Ed.
36. Maniotis AJ, Chen CS, & Ingber DE (1997) Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94(3):849-854. (Pubitemid 27074410)
37. Boudreau N & Bissell MJ (1998) Extracellular matrix signaling: integration of form and function in normal and malignant cells. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 10(5):640-646. (Pubitemid 28477023)
38. Huang S & Ingber DE (1999) The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control. Nature Cell Biology 1(5):E131-E138.
39. Schwartz MA & Ginsberg MH (2002) Networks and crosstalk: integrin signalling spreads. Nature Cell Biology 4(4):E65-E68. (Pubitemid 34308840)
40. Ingber DE (2003) Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction. Annals of Medicine 35(8):564-577. (Pubitemid 38005314)
41. Akiyama N, Ohnuki Y, Kunioka Y, Saeki Y, & Yamada T (2006) Transverse stiffness of myofibrils of skeletal and cardiac muscles studied by atomic force microscopy. Journal of Physiological Sciences 56(2):145-151. (Pubitemid 46955926)
42. Worth NF, Rolfe BE, Song J, & Campbell GR (2001) Vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation in culture is associated with reorganisation of contractile and cytoskeletal proteins. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 49(3):130-145. (Pubitemid 32708947)
43. Ross RS & Borg TK (2001) Integrins and the myocardium. Circulation Research 88(11):1112-1119. (Pubitemid 34132510)
44. Simon A, et al. (2003) Characterization of dynamic cellular adhesion of osteoblasts using atomic force microscopy. Cytometry Part A 54A(1):36-47. (Pubitemid 37521494)
45. Smith BA, Tolloczko B, Martin JG, & Grutter P (2005) Probing the viscoelastic behavior of cultured airway smooth muscle cells with atomic force microscopy: stiffening induced by contractile agonist. Biophysical Journal 88(4):2994-3007. (Pubitemid 40976162)
46. Tanaka TT & Fung YC (1974) Elastic and inelastic properties of canine aorta and their variation along aortic tree. Journal of Biomechanics 7(4):357-370.
47. Doehring TC, Carew EO, & Vesely I (2004) The effect of strain rate on the viscoelastic response of aortic valve tissue: A direct-fit approach. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 32(2):223-232.
48. Toms SR, Dakin GJ, Lemons JE, & Eberhardt AW (2002) Quasi-linear viscoelastic behavior of the human periodontal ligament. Journal of Biomechanics 35(10):1411-1415. (Pubitemid 35291979)
49. Engler AJ, Richert L,Wong JY, Picart C, & Discher DE (2004) Surface probe measurements of the elasticity of sectioned tissue, thin gels and polyelectrolyte multilayer films: Correlations between substrate stiffness and cell adhesion. Surface Science 570(1-2):142-154.
50. Bao G & Suresh S (2003) Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials. Nature Materials 2(11):715-725.
51. Nagayama K, Nagano Y, Sato M, & Matsumoto T (2006) Effiect of actin filament distribution on tensile properties of smooth muscle cells obtained from rat thoracic aortas. Journal of Biomechanics 39(2):293-301. (Pubitemid 41729003)