Measurement and characterization of whole-cell mechanical behavior

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 748-758

  Jaasma, Michael J ^a,b   Jackson, Wesley M ^a,b,c   Keaveny, Tony M ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d University of California at Berkeley   (United States)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscope; Cell mechanics; Mechanical properties; Osteoblasts

Indexed keywords

CELL MECHANICS; CELLULAR RESPONSES; OSTEOBLASTS;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHARACTERIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CELL CULTURE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL LINE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; ELASTICITY; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; STIMULATION; VISCOSITY; WEIGHT BEARING;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSTEOBLASTS; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; VISCOSITY; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 33744743261     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-006-9081-0     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. A-Hassan, E., W. F. Heinz, M. D. Antonik, N. P. D'Costa, S. Nageswaran, C. Schoenenberger, and J. H. Hoh. Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 74:1564-1578, 1998.
2. Alcaraz, J., L. Buscemi, M. Grabulosa, X. Trepat, B. Fabry, R. Farre, and D. Navajas. Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 84:2071-2079, 2003.
3. Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307-310, 1986.
4. Burr, D. B., A. G. Robling, and C. H. Turner. Effects of biomechanical stress on bones in animals. Bone 30:781-786, 2002.
5. Butt, H. J., and M. Jaschke. Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 6:1-7, 1995.
6. Charras, G. T., and M. A. Horton. Determination of cellular strains by combined atomic force microscopy and finite element modeling. Biophys. J. 83:858-879, 2002.
7. Charras, G. T., and M. A. Horton. Single cell mechanotransduction and its modulation analyzed by atomic force microscope indentation. Biophys. J. 82:2970-2981, 2002.
8. Charras, G. T., P. P. Lehenkari, and M. A. Horton. Atomic force microscopy can be used to mechanically stimulate osteoblasts and evaluate cellular strain distributions. Ultramicroscopy 86:85-95, 2001.
9. Collinsworth, A. M., S. Zhang, W. E. Kraus, and G. A. Truskey. Apparent elastic modulus and hysteresis of skeletal muscle cells throughout differentiation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 283:C1219-C1227, 2002.
10. Costa, K. D., and F. C. Yin. Analysis of indentation: Implications for measuring mechanical properties with atomic force microscopy. J. Biomech. Eng. 121:462-471, 1999.
11. Coughlin, M. F., and D. Stamenovic. A prestressed cable network model of the adherent cell cytoskeleton. Biophys. J. 84:1328-1336, 2003.
12. Cucina, A., A. V. Sterpetti, G. Pupelis, A. Fragale, and S. Lepidi. Shear stress induces changes in the morphology and cytoskeleton organisation of arterial endothelial cells. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 9:86-92, 1995.
13. Davies, P. F., A. Robotewskyj, and M. L. Griem. Quantitative studies of endothelial cell adhesion. Directional remodeling of focal adhesion sites in response to flow forces. J. Clin. Invest. 93:2031-2038, 1994.
14. Dimitriadis, E. K., F. Horkay, J. Maresca, B. Kachar, and R. S. Chadwick. Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J. 82:2798-2810, 2002.
15. Domke, J., and M. Radmacher. Measuring the elastic properties of thin polymer films with the atomic force microscope. Langmuir 14:3320-3325, 1998.
16. Freshney, R. I. Culture of Animal Cells. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2000.
17. Frisen, M., M. Magi, L. Sonnerup, and A. Viidik. Rheological analysis of soft collagenous tissue. J. Biomech. 2:13-20, 1969.
18. Fung, Y. C. Biomechanics: Motion, Flow, Stress, and Growth. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
19. Fung, Y. C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
20. Grubbs, F. E. Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics 11:1-21, 1969.
21. Haga, H., S. Sasaki, K. Kawabata, E. Ito, T. Ushiki, and T. Sambongi. Elasticity mapping of living fibroblasts by AFM and immunofluorescence observation of the cytoskeleton. Ultramicroscopy 82:253-258, 2000.
22. Hategan, A., R. Law, S. Kahn, and D. E. Discher. Adhesivelytensed cell membranes: Lysis kinetics and atomic force microscopy probing. Biophys. J. 85:2746-2759, 2003.
23. Hofmann, U. G., C. Rotsch, W. J. Parak, and M. Radmacher. Investigating the cytoskeleton of chicken cardiocytes with the atomic force microscope. J. Struct. Biol. 119:84-91, 1997.
24. Howard, J. Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 2001.
25. Hutter, J. L., and J. Bechhoefer. Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64:1868-1873, 1993.
26. Jaasma, M. J. Osteoblast Mechanical Behavior and Its Adaptation to Mechanical Loading. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2004.
27. Janmey, P. A. The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: Component localization and mechanical coupling. Physiol. Rev. 78:763-781, 1998.
28. Johnson, K. L. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
29. Lee, C. A., and T. A. Einhorn. The bone organ system. In: Osteoporosis, edited by R. Marcus, D. Feldman, and J. Kelsey, Vol. 1. New York: Academic, 2001, pp. 3-20.
30. Mahaffy, R. E., S. Park, E. Gerde, J. Kas, and C. K. Shih. Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 86:1777-1793, 2004.
31. Mahaffy, R. E., C. K. Shih, F. C. MacKintosh, and J. Kas. Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85:880-883, 2000.
32. Maniotis, A. J., C. S. Chen, and D. E. Ingber. Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94:849-854, 1997.
33. Mathur, A. B., G. A. Truskey, and W. M. Reichert. Atomic force and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy for the study of force transmission in endothelial cells. Biophys. J. 78: 1725-1735, 2000.
34. McElfresh, M., E. Baesu, R. Balhorn, J. Belak, M. J. Allen, and R. E. Rudd. Combining constitutive materials modeling with atomic force microscopy to understand the mechanical properties of living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99(Suppl 2):6493-6497, 2002.
35. Miyazaki, H., and K. Hayashi. Atomic force microscopic measurement of the mechanical properties of intact endothelial cells in fresh arteries. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37:530-536, 1999.
36. Ohashi, T., Y. Ishii, Y. Ishikawa, T. Matsumoto, and M. Sato. Experimental and numerical analyses of local mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy for sheared endothelial cells. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 12:319-327, 2002.
37. Pavalko, F. M., N. X. Chen, C. H. Turner, D. B. Burr, S. Atkinson, Y. F. Hsieh, J. Qiu, and R. L. Duncan. Fluid shear-induced mechanical signaling in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts requires cytoskeleton-integrin interactions. Am. J. Physiol. 275:C1591-C1601, 1998.
38. Petersen, N. O., W. B. McConnaughey, and E. L. Elson. Dependence of locally measured cellular deformability on position on the cell, temperature, and cytochalasin B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 79:5327-5331, 1982.
39. Radmacher, M., M. Fritz, C. M. Kacher, J. P. Cleveland, and P. K. Hansma. Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J. 70:556-567, 1996.
40. Raucher, D., and M. P. Sheetz. Characteristics of a membrane reservoir buffering membrane tension. Biophys. J. 77:1992-2002, 1999.
41. Rotsch, C., and M. Radmacher. Drug-induced changes in cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: An atomic force microscopy study. Biophys. J. 78:520-535, 2000.
42. Sato, M., K. Nagayama, N. Kataoka, M. Sasaki, and K. Hane. Local mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy for cultured bovine endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. J. Biomech. 33:127-135, 2000.
43. Sneddon, I. N. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3:47-57, 1965.
44. Sugawara, M., Y. Ishida, and H. Wada. Local mechanical properties of guinea pig outer hair cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Hear. Res. 174:222-229, 2002.
45. Sugawara, M., Y. Ishida, and H. Wada. Mechanical properties of sensory and supporting cells in the organ of Corti of the guinea pig cochlea - study by atomic force microscopy. Hear. Res. 192:57-64, 2004.
46. Wang, N., J. P. Butler, and D. E. Ingber. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 260:1124-1127, 1993.
47. Wang, N., K. Naruse, D. Stamenovic, J. J. Fredberg, S. M. Mijailovich, I. M. Tolic-Norrelykke, T. Polte, R. Mannix, and D. E. Ingber. Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:7765-7770, 2001.
48. Wu, H. W., T. Kuhn, and V. T. Moy. Mechanical properties of L929 cells measured by atomic force microscopy: Effects of anticytoskeletal drugs and membrane crosslinking. Scanning 20:389-397, 1998.
49. You, J., C. E. Yellowley, H. J. Donahue, Y. Zhang, Q. Chen, and C. R. Jacobs. Substrate deformation levels associated with routine physical activity are less stimulatory to bone cells relative to load-induced oscillatory fluid flow. J. Biomech. Eng. 122:387-393, 2000.