In vivo and in vitro evaluation of an Acetobacter xylinum synthesized microbial cellulose membrane intended for guided tissue repair

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Mendes, Péricles Nóbrega ^a   Rahal, Sheila Canevese ^a   Pereira Junior, Oduvaldo Cãmara Marques ^a   Fabris, Viciany Erique ^a   Lenharo, Sara Lais Rahal ^b   De Lima Neto, João Ferreira ^a   Da Cruz Landim Alvarenga, Fernanda ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b Botucatu Medical School ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; MUS;

CELLULOSE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CYTOLOGY; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; MALE; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RANDOMIZATION; TISSUE REGENERATION;

ANIMALS; CELLULOSE; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; MALE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; MICE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 64749104773     PISSN: 0044605X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-51-12     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Osteopromotion: a soft-tissue exclusion principle using a membrane for bone healing and bone neogenesis. A Linde P Alberius C Dahlin K Bjurstam Y Sundin, J Periodontol 1993 64 1116 1128 8295100
2. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. WK Czaja DJ Young M Kawecki RM Brown Jr, Biomacromolecules 2007 8 1 12 10.1021/bm060620d 17206781
3. Treatment of segmental defects in long bones using osteopromotive membranes and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. G Zellin A Linde, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1997 31 97 104 9232693
4. Guided tissue regeneration associated with bovine-derived anorganic bone in mandibular class II furcation defects. 6-month results at re-entry. JJ Simonpietri-C AB Novaes Jr EL Batista Jr EJF Filho, J Periodontol 2000 71 904 911 10.1902/jop.2000.71.6.904 10914793
5. Combination use of bovine porous bone mineral, enamel matrix proteins, and a bioabsorbable membrane in intrabony periodontal defects in humans. V Lekovic PM Camargo M Weinlaender EB Kenney N Vasilic, J Periodontol 2001 72 583 589 10.1902/jop.2001.72.5.583 11394392
6. Compartmentalized bone regeneration of cranial defects with biodegradable barriers: an animal model. S Stal K Tjelmeland J Hicks N Bhatia B Eppley L Hollier, J Craniofac Surg 2001 12 41 47 10.1097/00001665-200101000-00007 11314186
7. Migration of osteoblastic cells on various guided bone regeneration membranes. T Takata HL Wang M Miyauchi, Clin Oral Impl Res 2001 12 332 338 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004332.x
8. Bioabsorbable scaffolds for guided bone regeneration and generation. M Kellomäki H Niiranen K Puumanen N Ashammakhi T Waris P Törmä lä Biomaterials 2000 21 2495 2505 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00117-4 11071599
9. Bone regeneration with resorbable polymeric membranes: treatment of diaphyseal bone defects in the rabbit radius with poly(L-Lactide) membrane. A pilot study. RP Meinig B Rahn SM Perren S Gogolewski, J Orthop Trauma 1996 10 178 190 10.1097/00005131-199604000-00006 8667110
10. Bone morphogenetic protein induced repair of compartmentalized segmental diaphyseal defects. JOC Teixeira MR Urist, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998 117 27 34 10.1007/BF00703435 9457332
11. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. D Buser U Bragger NP Lang S Nyman, Clin Oral Implants Res 1990 1 22 32 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x 2099209
12. Guided tissue regeneration using degradable and non-degradable membranes in rabbit tibia. M Aaboe EM Pinholt E Hjorting-Hansen E Solheim F Praetorius, Clin Oral Impl Res 1993 4 172 176 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040402.x
13. Biofill: use and clinical evaluation of a cellulose graft in cutaneous lesions. R Peixoto DLN Santos, Rev Bras Cir 1988 78 141 145
14. Duraplasty with biosynthetic cellulose: an experimental study. LR Mello LT Feltrin PT Fontes Neto FA Ferraz, J Neurosurg 1997 86 143 150 8988093
15. Clinical comparison of cellulose and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in the treatment of class II furcations in mandibular molars with 6-month re-entry. B dos Anjos AB Novaes Jr R Meffert EP Barboza, J Periodontol 1998 69 454 459 9609376
16. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of e-PTFE and alkali-cellulose membranes for guided bone regeneration. LA Salata PV Hatton AJ Devlin GT Craig IM Brook, Clin Oral Impl Res 2001 12 62 68 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001062.x
17. Microsurgical repair of peripheral nerve by means of suture, fibrin glue or BioFill sheat in Wistar rats. MFP Torres DL Graça ELP Farias, Arq Bras Med Vet Zoo 2003 55 557 561
18. Evaluation of two membranes in guided bone tissue regeneration: histological study in rabbits. NL Macedo FS Matuda LGS Macedo ASF Monteiro MC Valera YR Carvalho, Braz J Oral Sci 2004 3 395 400
19. Microbial cellulose the natural power to heal wounds. WK Czaja A Krystynowicz S Bielecki RM Brown, Biomaterials 2006 27 145 151 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.035 16099034
20. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell-mediated repair of tendon. HA Awad DL Butler GP Boivin FNL Smith P Malaviya B Huibregtse AI Caplan, Tis Eng 1999 5 267 277 10.1089/ten.1999.5.267
21. Mesenchymal stem cells: cell-based reconstructive therapy in orthopedics. AI Caplan, Tis Eng 2005 11 1198 1211 10.1089/ten.2005.11.1198
22. Tissue-engineered bone using mesenchymal stem cells and a biodegradable scaffold. JS Boo Y Yamada Y Okazaki Y Hibino K Okada K Hata T Yoshikawa Y Sugiura M Ueda, J Craniofacial Surg 2002 13 231 239 10.1097/00001665-200203000- 00009
23. Surgical Procedures. HV Mendenhall, Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluations Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis, von Recum AF, 1999 481 491
24. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. G Helenius H Bäckdahl A Bodin U Nannmark P Gatenholm B Risberg, J Biomed Mater Res A 2006 76 431 438 16278860
25. KC Dee DA Puleo R Bizios, An Introduction to Tissue-Biomaterial Interactions New Jersey: Wiley-Liss 2002
26. Biodegradable guide for bone regeneration. Polyurethane membranes tested in rabbit radius defects. FF Nielsen T Karring S Gogolewski, Acta Orthop Scand 1992 63 66 69 1738975
27. Effects of different osteopromotive membrane porosities on experimental bone neogenesis in rats. G Zellin A Linde, Biomaterials 1996 17 695 702 10.1016/0142-9612(96)86739-1 8672631
28. Biomimetic synthesis of hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites for biomedical applications. YZ Wan Y Huang CD Yuan S Raman Y Zhu HJ Jiang F He C Gao, Mater Sci Eng C 2007 27 855 864 10.1016/j.msec.2006.10.002
29. A new bacterial cellulose substrate for mammalian cell culture. K Watanabe Y Eto S Takano S Nakamori H Shibai S Yamanaka, Cytotechnology 1993 13 107 114 10.1007/BF00749937 7764575
30. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. A Svensson E Nicklasson T Harrah B Panilaitis DL Kaplan M Brittberg P Gatenholm, Biomaterials 2005 26 419 431 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.049 15275816