Open access publishing models: Opportunity or threat to scholarly and academic publishers?

Learned Publishing

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 143-150

  Lamb, Christine ^a,b  

^a Publishing and Market Strategies   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1942504886     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/095315104322958526     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (Oct 2003) Berlin: Max Planck Society. URL: http://www.zim.mpg.de/ openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.html (accessed 23 Oct 2003).
2. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (20 Jun 2003) Chevy Chase, MD: Howard Hughes Medical Institute. URL: http://www.earlham.edu/%7Epeters/fos/ bethesda.htm#libraries (accessed 12 Dec 2003).
3. Brown, P., Eisen, M.B. and Varmus, H.E. (2003) Why PloS became a publisher. PloS Biology, 1 (1). URL: http://www.plosbiology.org/plosonline/? request+get-document&doi+10.1371/journal.pbi... (accessed 20 Nov 2003).
4. Budapest Open Access Initiative (14 Feb 2002) New York: Open Society Institute. URL: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml (accessed 10 Oct 2003).
5. Crow, R. and Goldstein, H. (2002) Guide to business planning for converting a subscription-based journal to open access. New York: Open Society Institute. URL: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/oajguides/business_converting. pdf (accessed 10 Oct 2003).
6. Guedon, J.-C.(2003) Creating scientific value with open access: a background paper for the Budapest meeting January 16-18, 2003. Budapest: Open Society Institute. URL: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/pdf/background_paper.pdf (accessed 5 Nov 2003).
7. Harnad, S. (2003) On the need to take both roads to open access. Liblicense listserv, 3 Oct 2003. URL: http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ ListArchives/0310/msg00011.html (accessed 10 Oct 2003).
8. Henderson, A. (2002) Diversity and the growth of scholarly scientific journals. In Richard, A.E. and Newlin, L.W. (eds), Scholarly Publishing Books, Journals, Publishers, and Libraries in the Twentieth Century. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 133-161.
9. Jongejan, A. (2003) Why publishers are good for research. Research Information, Autumn. URL: http://www.researchinformation.info/riaut03elsevier. html (accessed 10 Oct 2003).
10. Kyrillidou, M. and Young, M.(2003) ARL Statistics 2001-02: research library trends, Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. URL: http://www.arl.org/stats/arlstat/02pub/intro02.html (accessed 4 Dec 2003).
11. Odlyzko, A. (2002) The rapid evolution of scholarly publishing. Learned Publishing 15, 7-19. URL: http://mustafa.ingentaselect.com/vl=2325107/cl=66/fm= docpdf/nw=1/rpsv/catchword/alpsp/09531513/v15n1/s2/p7 (accessed 10 Oct 2003).
12. Odlyzko, A. (1997) The economics of electronic journals. First Monday, 2(8). URL: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue2_ 8/odlyzko/index.html (accessed 4 Nov 2003).
13. Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. (2000) Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers. Washington: DC: Special Libraries Association.
14. Wellcome Trust (2003) Economic Analysis of Scientific Research Publishing. London: The Wellcome Trust. URL: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk (accessed 10 Oct 2003).
15. Willinsky, J. (2003) Scholarly associations and the economic viability of open access publishing. Journal of Digital Information, 4 (2). URL: http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v04/i02/Willinsky/ (accessed 5 Nov 2003).