The boundaries of instance-based learning theory for explaining decisions from experience

Progress in Brain Research

Volumn 202, Issue , 2013, Pages 73-98

  Gonzalez, Cleotilde ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive models; Decisions from experience; IBL model; Instance based learning theory; Learning; Repeated choice; Risk; Sampling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT; EXPERIENCE; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INSTANCE BASED LEARNING THEORY; LEARNING CURVE; LEARNING THEORY; MEMORY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84872380470     PISSN: 00796123     EISSN: 18757855     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62604-2.00005-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Anderson J.R., Lebiere C. The Atomic Components of Thought 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Brehmer B. Strategies in real-time, dynamic decision making. Insights in Decision Making 1990, 262-279. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. R.M. Hogarth (Ed.).
3. Brehmer B. Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. Acta Psychol. 1992, 81(3):211-241.
4. Busemeyer J.R., Wang Y.M. Model comparison and model selections based on generalization criterion methodology. J. Math. Psychol. 2000, 44(1):171-189.
5. Bush R.R., Mosteller F. Stochastic Models for Learning 1955, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Oxford, UK.
6. Dienes Z., Fahey R. Role of specific instances in controlling a dynamic system. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1995, 21(4):848-862.
7. Dreyfus H.L., Dreyfus S.E. Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer 1986, The Free Press, New York.
8. Dutt V., Gonzalez C. The role of inertia in modeling decisions from experience with Instance-Based Learning. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3(177):1-12.
9. Dutt V., Yamaguchi M., Gonzalez C., Proctor R.W. An instance-based learning model of stimulus-response compatibility effects in mixed location-relevant and location-irrelevant tasks 2009, A. Howes, D. Peebles, R. Cooper (Eds.).
10. Edwards W. Behavioral decision theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1961, 12:473-498.
11. Edwards W. Dynamic decision theory and probabilistic information processing. Hum. Factors 1962, 4:59-73.
12. Erev I., Barron G. On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. Psychol. Rev. 2005, 112(4):912-931.
13. Erev I., Roth A.E. Simple reinforcement learning models and reciprocation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox 2001, 215-231. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. G. Gigerenzer, R. Selten (Eds.).
14. Erev I., Ert E., Yechiam E. Loss aversion, diminishing sensitivity, and the effect of experience on repeated decisions. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 2008, 21:575-597.
15. Erev I., Ert E., Roth A.E. A choice prediction competition for market entry games: an introduction. Games 2010, 1:117-136.
16. Erev I., Ert E., Roth A.E., Haruvy E., Herzog S., Hau R., et al. A choice prediction competition for choices from experience and from description. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 2010, 23:15-47.
17. Ert E., Erev I. On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk 2011, Unpublished manuscript.
18. Gibson F.P., Fichman M., Plaut D.C. Learning in dynamic decision tasks: computational model and empirical evidence. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1997, 71(1):1-35.
19. Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Case-based decision theory. Q. J. Econ. 1995, 110(3):605-639.
20. Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Case-based knowledge and induction. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. A Syst. Hum. 2000, 30(2):85-95.
21. Gonzalez C. Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: effects of time constraints and cognitive abilities. Hum. Factors 2004, 46(3):449-460.
22. Gonzalez C. Decision support for real-time dynamic decision making tasks. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2005, 96(2):142-154.
23. Gonzalez C., Dutt V. Instance-based learning models of training. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting 2010, 2319-2323. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Francisco, CA.
24. Gonzalez C., Dutt V. Instance-based learning: integrating decisions from experience in sampling and repeated choice paradigms. Psychol. Rev. 2011, 118(4):523-551.
25. Gonzalez C., Lebiere C. Instance-based cognitive models of decision making. Transfer of Knowledge in Economic Decision-Making 2005, 148-165. Macmillan (Palgrave Macmillan), New York. D. Zizzo, A. Courakis (Eds.).
26. Gonzalez C., Martin J.M. Scaling up instance-based learning theory to account for social interactions. Negot. Confl. Manage. Res. 2011, 4(2):110-128.
27. Gonzalez C., Lerch J.F., Lebiere C. Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making. Cognit. Sci. 2003, 27(4):591-635.
28. Gonzalez C., Best B.J., Healy A.F., Bourne L.E., Kole J.A. A cognitive modeling account of simultaneous learning and fatigue effects. J. Cognit. Syst. Res. 2010, 12(1):19-32.
29. Gonzalez C., Dutt V., Lejarraga T. A loser can be a winner: comparison of two instance-based learning models in a market entry competition. Games 2011, 2(1):136-162.
30. Gonzalez C., Dutt V., Martin J., Ben-Asher N. Decisions from experience in conflict situations: cognitive model of the effects of interdependence information 2012, Leeds School of Business, Boulder, CO.
31. Gonzalez, C., Dutt, V., Lebiere, C., in press. Validating instance-based learning mechanisms outside of ACT-R. J. Comput. Sci.
32. Haruvy E., Erev I. On the application and interpretation of learning models. Advances in Experimental Business Research 2001, 285-300. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA. R. Zwick, A. Rapoport (Eds.).
33. Hertwig R. Tapping into the wisdom of the crowd-with confidence. Science 2012, 336:303-304.
34. Hertwig R., Erev I. The description-experience gap in risky choice. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13(12):517-523.
35. Hertwig R., Barron G., Weber E.U., Erev I. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15(8):534-539.
36. Hogarth R.M. Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. Psychol. Bull. 1981, 90(2):197-217.
37. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-291.
38. Kerstholt J.H., Raaijmakers J.G.W. Decision making in dynamic task environments. Decision Making: Cognitive Models and Explanations 1997, 205-217. Routledge, London. R. Ranyard, W.R. Crozier, O. Svenson (Eds.).
39. Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods 1993, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ. G.A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, C.E. Zsambok (Eds.).
40. Ert E., Erev I. On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk 1998, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
41. Lebiere C., Wallach D., West R.L. A memory-based account of the prisoner's dilemma and other 2×2 games 2000, 185-193. Universal Press, NL.
42. Lebiere C., Gonzalez C., Martin M. Instance-based decision making model of repeated binary choice. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling 2007, 67-72. Psychology Press, Oxford, UK. R.L. Lewis, T.A. Polk, J.E. Laird (Eds.).
43. Lejarraga, T., Dutt, V., Gonzalez, C., 2010. Instance-based learning in repeated binary choice. Paper presented at the Society for Judgement and Decision Making.
44. Lejarraga T., Dutt V., Gonzalez C. Instance-based learning: a general model of repeated binary choice. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 2012, 25(2):143-153.
45. Martin M.K., Gonzalez C., Lebiere C. Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: ACT-R plays the beer game. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling 2004, vol. 420:178-183. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Pittsburgh, PA.
46. Myers J.L., Reilly R.E., Taub H.A. Differential cost, gain, and relative frequency of reward in a sequential choice situation. J. Exp. Psychol. 1961, 62(4):357-360.
47. Pew R.W., Mavor A.S. Modeling Human and Organizational Behavior 1998, National City Press, Washington.
48. Rakow T., Miler K. Doomed to repeat the successes of the past: history is best forgotten for repeated choices with nonstationary payoffs. Mem. Cognit. 2009, 37(7):985-1000.
49. Rapoport A. Research paradigms for studying dynamic decision behavior. Utility, probability, and human decision making 1975, 349-375. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. D. Wendt, C. Vlek (Eds.).
50. Rapoport A., Chammah A.M. Prisoner's Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation 1965, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
51. Rapoport A., Mowshowitz A. Experimental studies of stochastic models for the Prisoner's dilemma. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 1966, 11(6):444-458.
52. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185(4157):1124-1131.
53. Naturalistic Decision Making 1997, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ. C.E. Zsambok, G.A. Klein (Eds.).