Instance-based decision making model of repeated binary choice

Proceedings of ICCM 2007 - 8th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 67-72

  Lebiere, Christian ^a   Gonzalez, Cleotilde ^a   Martin, Michael ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ACT R; Cognitive architectures; Dynamic decision making; Learning; Memory; RELACS

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES; DECISION MAKING MODELS; DYNAMIC CONTROLS; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; METACOGNITIVES; RISK AVERSION;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 85031904174     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The Atomic Components of Thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 111, (4). 1036-1060.
3. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.
4. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 106(3), 432-459.
5. Dienes, Z., & Fahey, R. (1995). Role of specific instances in controlling a dynamic system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(4), 848-862.
6. Erev, I., & Barron, G. (2005). On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. Psychological Review, 112(4), 912-931.
7. Gonzalez, C., & Lebiere, C. (2005). Instance-based cognitive models of decision making. In D. Zizzo & A. Courakis (Eds.), Transfer of knowledge in economic decision-making: Macmillan (Palgrave Macmillan).
8. Gonzalez, C., Lerch, J. F., & Lebiere, C. (2003). Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making. Cognitive Science, 27(4), 591-635.
9. Gonzalez, C., & Quesada, J. (2003). Learning in dynamic decision making: The recognition process. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 9(4), 287-304.
10. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
11. th ACT-R Workshop. George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
12. Lebiere, C., Wallach, D., & West, R. L. (2000). A memory-based account of the prisoner's dilemma and other 2x2 games. In Proceedings of International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, pp. 185-193. NL: Universal Press.
13. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492-527.
14. Martin, M. K., Gonzalez, C., & Lebiere, C. (2004). Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: ACT-R plays the beer game. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Pittsburgh, PA
15. O'Reilly, R. C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Sanner, S., Anderson, J. R., Lebiere, C., & Lovett, M. C. (2000). Achieving efficient and cognitively plausible learning in Backgammon. Proceedings of The Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
17. Tenenbaum, J. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2001). Generalization, similarity and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (24), 629-640.
18. Wallach, D. & Lebiere, C. (2003). Conscious and unconscious knowledge: Mapping to the symbolic and subsymbolic levels of a hybrid architecture. In Jimenez, L. (Ed.) Attention and Implicit Learning. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
19. West, R. L., & Lebiere, C. (2001). Simple games as dynamic, coupled systems: Randomness and other emergent properties. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1(4), 221-239.