Multiple mating by females is a natural outcome of a null model of mate encounters

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Volumn 146, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 26-37

  Kokko, Hanna ^a   Mappes, Johanna ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Choosiness; Mate choice; Mate number; Model study; Monandry; Polyandry; Sperm limitation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COGNITION; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FEMALE; INSECT; MATE CHOICE; MATING BEHAVIOR; POLYANDRY; RISK FACTOR; SENSORY SYSTEM; STOCHASTICITY;

HEXAPODA;

EID: 84872379950     PISSN: 00138703     EISSN: 15707458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01296.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Agrell J, Wolff JO & Ylönen H (1998) Counter-strategies to infanticide in mammals: costs and consequences. Oikos 83: 507-517.
2. Albrecht T, Kreisinger J & Piálek J (2006) The strength of direct selection against female promiscuity is associated with rates of extrapair fertilizations in socially monogamous songbirds. American Naturalist 167: 737-742.
3. Almbro M & Kullberg C (2009) The downfall of mating: the effect of mate-carrying and flight muscle ratio on the escape ability of a pierid butterfly. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63: 413-420.
4. Arnqvist G & Henriksson S (1997) Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints. Evolutionary Ecology 11: 255-273.
5. Arnqvist G & Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60: 145-164.
6. Baker RH, Ashwell RIS, Richards TA, Fowler K, Chapman T & Pomiankowski A (2001) Effects of multiple mating and male eye span on female reproductive output in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Behavioral Ecology 12: 732-739.
7. Barry KL & Kokko H (2010) Male mate choice: why sequential choice can make its evolution difficult. Animal Behaviour 80: 163-169.
8. Bergmüller R (2010) Animal personality and behavioural syndromes. Animal Behavior: Evolution and Mechanisms (ed. by P Kappeler ), pp. 587-621. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
9. Bernasconi G & Keller L (2001) Female polyandry affects their sons' reproductive success in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 186-193.
10. Bleu J, Bessa-Gomes C & Laloi D (2012) Evolution of female choosiness and mating frequency: effects of mating cost, density and sex ratio. Animal Behaviour 83: 131-136.
11. Bode M & Marshall DJ (2007) The quick and the dead? Sperm competition and sexual conflict in sea. Evolution 61: 2693-2700.
12. Calabrese JM, Ries L, Matter SF, Debinski DM, Auckland JN et al. (2008) Reproductive asychrony in natural butterfly populations and its consequences for female matelessness. Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 746-756.
13. del Castillo RC & Núnez-Farfán J (2002) Female mating success and risk of pre-reproductive death in a grasshopper. Oikos 96: 217-224.
14. Dall SRX, Houston AI & McNamara JM (2004) The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecology Letters 7: 734-739.
15. Eizaguirre C, Laloi D, Massot M, Richard M, Federici P & Clobert J (2007) Condition dependence of reproductive strategy and the benefits of polyandry in a viviparous lizard. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274: 425-430.
16. Elzinga JA, Chevasco V, Grapputo A & Mappes J (2011) Influence of male mating history on female reproductive success among monandrous Naryciinae (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Ecological Entomology 36: 170-180.
17. Evans JP & Marshall DJ (2005) Male-by-female interactions influence fertilization success and mediate the benefits of polyandry in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Evolution 59: 106-112.
18. Evans JP & Simmons LW (2008) The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm? Genetica 134: 5-19.
19. Fedina TY & Lewis SM (2007) Female mate choice across mating stages and between sequential mates in flour beetles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 2138-2143.
20. Fisher DO, Double MC, Blomberg SP, Jennions MD & Cockburn A (2006) Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild. Nature 444: 89-92.
21. Fitze PS, Cote J & Clobert J (2010) Mating order-dependent female mate choice in the polygynandrous common lizard Lacerta vivipara. Oecologia 162: 331-341.
22. Forstmeier W, Martin K, Bolund E, Schielzeth H & Kempenaers B (2011) Female extrapair mating behavior can evolve via indirect selection on males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108: 10608-10613.
23. Fossøy F, Johnsen A & Lifjeld JT (2008) Multiple genetic benefits of female promiscuity in a socially monogamous passerine. Evolution 62: 145-156.
24. Gowaty PA, Kim YK, Rawlings J & Anderson WW (2010) Polyandry increases offspring viability and mother productivity but does not decrease mother survival in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 13771-13776.
25. Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. Mate Choice (ed. by P Bateson ), pp. 3-32. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
26. Hasson O & Stone L (2009) Male infertility, female fertility and extrapair copulations. Biological Reviews 84: 225-244.
27. Ivy TM & Sakaluk SK (2005) Polyandry promotes enhanced offspring survival in decorated crickets. Evolution 59: 152-159.
28. Jennions MD & Kokko H (2010) Sexual selection. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology (ed. by DF Westneat & CW Fox ), pp. 343-364. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
29. Jennions MD, Kokko H & Klug H (2012) The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25: 591-598.
30. Jennions MD & Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate mutiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews 75: 21-64.
31. de Jong MCM & Sabelis MW (1991) Limits to runaway sexual selection: the wallflower paradox. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4: 637-655.
32. Kawagoe T, Suzuki N & Matsumoto K (2001) Multiple mating reduces longevity of females of the windmill butterfly Atrophaneura alcinous. Ecological Entomology 26: 258-262.
33. Kokko H & Mappes J (2005) Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed. Evolution 59: 1876-1885.
34. Larsdotter Mellström H, Friberg M, Borg-Karlson AK, Murtazina R, Palm M & Wiklund C (2010) Seasonal polyphenism in life history traits: time costs of direct development in a butterfly. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64: 1377-1383.
35. Larsdotter Mellström H & Wiklund C (2010) What affects mating rate? Polyandry is higher in the directly developing generation of the butterfly Pieris napi. Animal Behaviour 80: 413-418.
36. Lee PLM & Hays GC (2004) Polyandry in a marine turtle: females make the best of a bad job. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101: 6530-6535.
37. Maklakov AA, Kremer N & Arnqvist G (2006) Ageing and the evolution of female resistance to remating in seed beetles. Biology Letters 2: 62-64.
38. McNamara JM & Houston AI (2009) Integrating function and mechanism. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 670-675.
39. Mokkonen M, Koskela E, Mappes T & Mills SC (2012) Sexual antagonism for testosterone maintains multiple mating behaviour. Journal of Animal Ecology 81: 277-283.
40. Moore PJ & Moore AJ (2001) Reproductive aging and mating: the ticking of the biological clock in female cockroaches. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98: 9171-9176.
41. Moya-Laraño J & Fox CW (2006) Total ejaculate size, second male body size and moderate polyandry increase female fecundity in a seed beetle. Behavioral Ecology 17: 940-946.
42. Pai A, Feil S & Yan G (2007) Variation in polyandry and its fitness consequences among populations of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Evolutionary Ecology 21: 687-702.
43. Pitcher TE, Neff BD, Rodd FH & Rowe L (2003) Multiple mating and sequential mate choice in guppies: females trade up. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 1623-1629.
44. Priest NK, Galloway LF & Roach DA (2008) Mating frequency and inclusive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. American Naturalist 171: 10-21.
45. Pryke SR, Rollins LA & Griffith SC (2010) Females use multiple mating and genetically loaded sperm competition to target compatible genes. Science 329: 964-967.
46. Rhainds M (2010) Female mating failures in insects. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 136: 211-226.
47. Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Bretman A, Hadfield JD & Tregenza T (2008) Sexual selection in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: no good genes? Genetica 134: 129-136.
48. Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Bretman A, Slate J, Walling CA & Tregenza T (2010) Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population. Science 328: 1269-1272.
49. Rubenstein DR (2007) Female extrapair mate choice in a cooperative breeder: trading sex for help and increasing offspring heterozygosity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274: 1895-1903.
50. Sih A, Bell A & Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 372-378.
51. Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36: 125-146.
52. Teuschl Y & Blanckenhorn WU (2007) The reluctant fly: what makes Sepsis cynipsea females willing to copulate? Animal Behaviour 73: 85-97.