메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 112, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 47-57

Whither Stakeholder Theory? A Guide for the Perplexed Revisited

Author keywords

Agency theory; Labor unions; Organizational ethics; Stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords


EID: 84872357667     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1231-8     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (55)

References (13)
  • 1
    • 84870372964 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reclaiming marginalized stakeholders
    • doi: 10. 1007/s10551-012-1205-x
    • Derry, R. (2012). Reclaiming marginalized stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10. 1007/s10551-012-1205-x.
    • (2012) Journal of Business Ethics
    • Derry, R.1
  • 2
    • 84864398089 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The inescapability of a minimal version of normative stakeholder theory
    • Robert APhillips (Ed.), Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc
    • Donaldson, T. (2011). The inescapability of a minimal version of normative stakeholder theory. In Robert A. Phillips (Ed.), Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects (p. 130). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
    • (2011) Stakeholder Theory: Impact and Prospects , pp. 130
    • Donaldson, T.1
  • 3
    • 21844463321 scopus 로고
    • The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications
    • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
    • (1995) Academy of Management Review , vol.20 , Issue.1 , pp. 65-91
    • Donaldson, T.1    Preston, L.E.2
  • 4
    • 31144442205 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Enhancing stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community
    • Dunham, L., et al. (2006). Enhancing stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23-42.
    • (2006) Business Ethics Quarterly , vol.16 , Issue.1 , pp. 23-42
    • Dunham, L.1
  • 5
    • 0001223696 scopus 로고
    • The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions
    • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421.
    • (1994) Business Ethics Quarterly , vol.4 , Issue.4 , pp. 409-421
    • Freeman, R.E.1
  • 6
    • 0033241674 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Divergent stakeholder theory
    • Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233-236.
    • (1999) Academy of Management Review , vol.24 , Issue.2 , pp. 233-236
    • Freeman, R.E.1
  • 7
    • 33750562754 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation
    • 7th edn., T. Donaldson (Ed.), Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ
    • Freeman, R. E. (2002). Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In T. Donaldson, et al. (Eds.), Ethical issues in business (7th ed., p. 44). Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
    • (2002) Ethical Issues in Business , pp. 44
    • Freeman, R.E.1
  • 9
    • 0002382507 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The normative theories of business ethics: A guide for the perplexed
    • Hasnas, J. (1998). The normative theories of business ethics: A guide for the perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1), 19-42.
    • (1998) Business Ethics Quarterly , vol.8 , Issue.1 , pp. 19-42
    • Hasnas, J.1
  • 10
    • 70350786343 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The uses and abuses of agency theory
    • Heath, J. (2009). The uses and abuses of agency theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(4), 497-528.
    • (2009) Business Ethics Quarterly , vol.19 , Issue.4 , pp. 497-528
    • Heath, J.1
  • 11
    • 0001122564 scopus 로고
    • The morality of the corporation: An empirical or normative disagreement?
    • Maitland, I. (1994). The morality of the corporation: An empirical or normative disagreement? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 445-458.
    • (1994) Business Ethics Quarterly , vol.4 , Issue.4 , pp. 445-458
    • Maitland, I.1
  • 13
    • 0344927311 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What stakeholder theory is not
    • Phillips, R., et al. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479-502.
    • (2003) Business Ethics Quarterly , vol.13 , Issue.4 , pp. 479-502
    • Phillips, R.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.