The inescapability of a minimal version of normative stakeholder theory

Stakeholder Theory: Impact and Prospects

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 130-139

  Donaldson, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864398089     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (12)

1. Blair, M.M. and Stout, L.A. 1999. Team production in business organizations: an introduction. Journal of Corporation Law, 24(4): 743-750.
2. Coase, R.H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1-44.
3. Donaldson, T. 1982. Corporations and Morality. Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
4. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65-91.
5. Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. 1983. Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2): 327.
6. Feinberg, J. 1966. Duties, rights and claims, American Philosophical Quarterly, 3: 137-144.
7. Jensen, M.C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235-247.
8. Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
9. Shue, H. 1980. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
11. Williamson, O.E. 1996a. Economics and organization: a primer. California Management Review, 38(2): 131-146.
12. Williamson, O.E. 1996b. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.