Test driving interventions to increase treatment integrity and student outcomes

School Psychology Review

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 467-481

  Dart, Evan H ^b   Cook, Clayton R ^a   Collins, Tai A ^b   Gresham, Frank M ^b   Chenier, Jeffrey S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872339258     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allinder, R. M., & Oats, R. G. (1997). Effects of acceptability on teachers' implementation of curriculumbased measurement and student achievement in mathematics computation. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 113-120.
2. Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1968). Reinforcer sampling: A technique for increasing the behavior of mental patients. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 13-20.
3. Bergan, J. R., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy New York, NY: Plenum
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 425-434.
5. Dalton, T., Martella, R. C, & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (1999). The effects of a self-management program in reducing off-task behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 157-176.
6. Day, R. (1984). Modeling choices among alternative responses to dissatisfaction. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 496-500.
7. DiGennaro, F. D., Martens, B. K., & Mclntytre, L. L. (2005). Increasing treatment integrity through negative reinforcement: Effects on teacher and student behavior. School Psychology Review, 34, 220-231. (Pubitemid 41017199)
8. DiGennaro, F. D. (2007). Examining the relationship between treatment integrity and student outcomes: A comparison of performance feedback, goal setting, and negative reinforcement procedures with teachers (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses
9. Elliott, S. N., Witt, J. C, Galvin, G. A., & Peterson, R. (1984). Acceptability of positive and reductive behavioral interventions: Factors that influence teachers' decisions. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 353-360.
10. Gonzalez, J. E., Nelson, J. R., Gutkin, T. B., & Shwery, C. S. (2004). Teacher resistance to school-based consultation with school psychologists: A survey of teacher perceptions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 30-37. (Pubitemid 38390037)
11. Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37-50.
12. Gresham, F. M. (2005). Response to intervention: An alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 328-344.
13. Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review, 38, 445-459.
14. Hawken, L. H., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Evaluation of a targeted intervention within a schoolwide system of behavior support. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 225-240.
15. Heiman, A., & Eitan, M. (1996). Using demonstration to increase new product acceptance: Controlling demonstration time. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 422430.
16. Hintze, J. M. (2005). Psychometrics of direct observation. School Psychology Review, 34, 507-519.
17. Hoff, K. E., & DuPaul, G. J. (1998). Reducing disruptive behavior in general education classrooms: The use of self-Management strategies. School Psychology Review, 27, 290-303.
18. Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259-273.
19. Kazdin, A. E., & Cole, P. M. (1981). Attitudes and labeling biases toward behavior modification: The effects of labels, content, and jargon. Behavior Therapy, 12, 5668.
20. Kutsick, K. A., Gutkin, T. B., & Witt, J. C. (1991). The impact of treatment development process, intervention type, and problem severity on treatment acceptability as judged by teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 325-331.
21. Lattal, K. A., & Ziegler, D. R. (1980). Recording and storing data for yoked-Control comparisons. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 131-132.
22. Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C, Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school based interventions. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 16, 191-198.
23. Musser, E. H., Bray, M. A., Kehle, T. J., & Jenson, W. R. (2001). Reducing disruptive behaviors in students with serious emotional disturbance. School Psychology Review, 30, 294-304.
24. Noell, G. H., & Witt, J. C. (1999). When does consultation lead to intervention implementation? Critical issues for research and practice. Journal of Special Education, 33, 29-35.
25. Noell, O. H., Witt, J. C, Gilbertson, D. N., Ranier, D. D., & Freeland, J. T. (1997). Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 77-88. (Pubitemid 127685330)
26. Noell, G. H., Gresham, F. M., & Gansle, K. A. (2002). Does treatment integrity matter? A preliminary investigation of instructional implementation and mathematics performance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 51-67.
27. Peterson, L., Homer, A., & Wunderlich, S. (1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 477-492.
28. Pisecco, S., Huzinec, C, & Curtis, D. 2001). The effect of child characteristics on teachers' acceptability of classroom-based behavioral strategies and psychostimulant medication for the treatment of ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 413-421. (Pubitemid 33658632)
29. Russell, E. (2010). The Fundamentals of Marketing Lausanne, Switerland: AVA Publishing
30. Smith, R. E., & Swinyard, W. R. (1983). Attitude-behavior consistency: The impact of product trial versus advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 257267.
31. Sterling-Turner, H. E., & Watson, T. S. (2002). An analog investigation of the relationship between treatment acceptability and treatment integrity. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 39-50.
32. Sutherland, K. E., Wehby, J. H., & Copeland, S. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 2-8, 26
33. Todd, A. W., Campbell, A. L., Meyer, G. G., & Horner, R. H. (2008). The effects of a targeted intervention to reduce problem behaviors: Elementary school implementation of check in-Check out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 46-55.
34. Urban, G. L., Hauser, J. R., & Roberts, J. H. (1990). Prelaunch forecasting of new automobiles. Management Science, 36, 401-421.
35. Walker, H. M. (1995). The acting-out child: Coping with classroom disruption (2nd ed.) Longmont, CO: Sopris West
36. Walker, H. M., Ramsay, E., & Gresham, F. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence based practices (2nd ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning
37. Wickstrom, K. E, Jones, K. M., LaFleur, L. H., & Witt, J. C. (1998). An analysis of treatment integrity in schoolbased behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 141-154.
38. Wilkinson, L. A. (2003). Using behavioral consultation to reduce challenging behavior in the classroom. Preventing School Failure, 47(3), 100-105.
39. Witt, J. C, & Elliot, S. N. (1982). The response cost lottery: A time efficient and effective classroom intervention. Journal of School Psychology, 20, 155-161.
40. Witt, J. C, & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 252-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
41. Witt, J. C, Moe, G., Gutkin, T. B., & Andrew, L.1984). The effect of saying the same thing in different ways: The problem of language and jargon in school based consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 361-367.
42. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.