Application of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc: Long-term x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up results

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 123, Issue 21, 2010, Pages 2999-3002

  Zhao, Yan Bin ^a   Sun, Yu ^a   Chen, Zhong Qiang ^a   Liu, Zhong Jun ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY THIRD HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Bryan cervical disc prosthesis; Cervical disc arthroplasty; Cervical disc degeneration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BRYAN CERVICAL DISC PROSTHESIS; CERVICAL DISK ARTHROPLASTY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROGNOSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649305791     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2010.21.009     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GC, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 519-528.
2. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 840-847.
3. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, et al. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 2003; 28: 2673-2678.
4. Goffin J, van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Lipscomb B. A clinical analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 261-269.
5. Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 417-423.
6. White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM. The basic kinematics of the human spine: a review of past and current knowledge. Spine 1978; 3: 12-20.
7. Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Morishita Y, Wang JC. Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21: 288-292.
8. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16: 384-389.
9. Bose B. Anterior cervical fusion using Caspar plating: analysis of results and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 1998; 49: 25-31.
10. Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR. Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plating: a 5 to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine 2005; 30: 2138-2144.
11. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004; 17: 79-85.
12. Park DH, Ramakrishnan P, Cho TH, Lorenz E, Eck JC, Humphreys SC, et al. Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7: 336-340.
13. Schwab JS, Diangelo DJ, Foley KT. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Spine 2006; 31: 2439-2448.
14. Capen DA, Garland DE, Waters RL. Surgical stabilization of the cervical spine. A comparative analysis of anterior and posterior spine fusions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 196: 229-237.
15. Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Anderson PA, Fessler RG, Hacker RJ, et al. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 2009; 34: 101-107.
16. Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Toyama Y, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degereration comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine 2010; 35: 36-43.
17. Schiebler ML, Grenier N, Fallon M, Camerino V, Zlatkin M, Kressel HY, et al. Normal and degenerated intervertebral disk: in vivo and in vitro MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 930-997.
18. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2001; 26: 1873-1878.