Smelling in multiple dimensions

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 5-6, 2012, Pages 569-575

  Agapakis, Christina M ^a   Tolaas, Sissel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Re SearchLab   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PERFUME;

BACTERIUM ISOLATION; FLAVOR; MOLECULE; NEUROSCIENCE; ODOR; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SMELLING;

ANIMALS; ESTHETICS; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; ODORS; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; PHILOSOPHY; SCIENCE; SMELL;

EID: 84872273087     PISSN: 13675931     EISSN: 18790402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.10.035     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Shiner L., Kriskovets Y. The aesthetics of smelly art. J Aesthetics Art Criticism 2007, 65:273-286.
2. Miller W.I. The Anatomy of Disgust 1998, Harvard University Press.
3. Roberts L. The death of the sensuous chemist: the "new" chemistry and the transformation of sensuous technology. Stud History Philos Sci Part A 1995, 26:503-529.
4. Chastrette M. Data management in olfaction studies. SAR QSAR Environ Res 1998, 8:157-181.
5. Hoffmann R. Molecular beauty. J Aesthetics Art Criticism 1990, 48:191-204.
6. Haddad R., Lapid H., Harel D., Sobel N. Measuring smells. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2008, 18:438-444.
7. Zarzo M. Hedonic judgments of chemical compounds are correlated with molecular size. Sensors 2011, 11:3667-3686.
8. Khan R.M., Luk C.H., Flinker A., Aggarwal A., Lapid H., Haddad R., Sobel N. Predicting odor pleasantness from odorant structure: pleasantness as a reflection of the physical world. J Neurosci 2007, 27:10015-10023.
9. Haddad R., Medhanie A., Roth Y., Harel D., Sobel N. Predicting odor pleasantness with an electronic nose. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000740.
10. Sell C.S. On the unpredictability of odor. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2006, 45:6254-6261.
11. Lawless H.T., Glatter S., Hohn C. Context-dependent changes in the perception of odor quality. Chem Senses 1991, 16:349-360.
12. Zarzo M. Psychologic dimensions in the perception of everyday odors: pleasantness and edibility. J Sens Stud 2008, 23:354-376.
13. Coppin G., Sander D. The flexibility of chemosensory preferences. The Neuroscience of Preference and Choice 2012, 257-275. Academic Press. R.J. Dolan, T. Sharot (Eds.).
14. Yoshida M. Studies of psychometric classification of odors. Jpn Psychol Res 1964, 6:145-154.
15. Zarzo M. Relevant psychological dimensions in the perceptual space of perfumery odors. Food Qual Preference 2008, 19:315-322.
16. Wnuk E., Majid A. Olfaction in a hunter-gatherer society: insights from language and culture. CogSci 2012: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2012.
17. Herz R.S., Clef J.V. The influence of verbal labeling on the perception of odors: evidence for olfactory illusions?. Perception 2001, 30:381-391.
18. Thierry A., Maillard M., Yvon M. Conversion of l-leucine to isovaleric acid by Propionibacterium freudenreichii TL 34 and ITGP23. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68:608.
19. Leyden J., McGinley K., Hölzle E., Labows J., Kligman A. The microbiology of the human axilla and its relationship to axillary odor. J Invest Dermatol 1981, 77:413-416.
20. Zarzo M., Stanton D.T. Understanding the underlying dimensions in perfumers' odor perception space as a basis for developing meaningful odor maps. Atten Percept Psychophys 2009, 71:225-247.
21. Gardner J.W., Bartlett P.N. A brief history of electronic noses. Sens Actuators B: Chem 1994, 18:210-211.
22. Fend R., Kolk A.H.J., Bessant C., Buijtels P., Klatser P.R., Woodman A.C. Prospects for clinical application of electronic-nose technology to early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in culture and sputum. J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44:2039-2045.
23. Wongchoosuk C., Lutz M., Kerdcharoen T. Detection and classification of human body odor using an electronic nose. Sensors 2009, 9:7234-7249.
24. Harel D., Carmel L., Lancet D. Towards an odor communication system. Comput Biol Chem 2003, 27:121-133.
25. Platt C. You've Got Smell! 1999, Wired, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/7.11/digiscent.html.
26. Vesna V. Toward a third culture: being in between. Leonardo 2001, 34:121-125.
27. Feyerabend P. Theoreticians, artists and artisans. Leonardo 1996, 29:23-28.
28. Flannery M.C. Goethe and the molecular aesthetic. Janus Head 2005, 8:273-289.
29. Grice E.A., Segre J.A. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Micro 2011, 9:244-253.
30. Doty R. Olfactory communication in humans. Chem Senses 1981, 6:351-376.
31. Havlicek J., Roberts S.C. MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: a review. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009, 34:497-512.
32. Willis C.M., Church S.M., Guest C.M., Cook W.A., McCarthy N., Bransbury A.J., Church M.R.T., Church J.C.T. Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study. BMJ 2004, 329:712.
33. Wilson A.D., Baietto M. Advances in electronic-nose technologies developed for biomedical applications. Sensors 2011, 11:1105-1176.
34. Knols B.G., De Jong R. Limburger cheese as an attractant for the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae s.s. Parasitol Today 1996, 12:159-161.
35. Douglas M. Purity and Danger 1966, 21. Routledge & Kegan Paul.