Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in paediatric cardiac surgery: Correlation between change in thoracic fluid content and change in patient body weight

Journal of International Medical Research

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 2295-2304

  Kang, W S ^a   Lee, J H ^a   Shin, H J ^a   Kim, S H ^a   Kim, T Y ^a   Seo, D M ^a   Yoon, T G ^a  

^a Konkuk University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Body weight gain; Congenital heart disease; Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring; Paediatric cardiac surgery; Thoracic fluid content

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY FLUID; CARDIAC EQUIPMENT; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM EXAMINATION; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; FEMALE; FLUID BALANCE; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INFANT; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NONINVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITORING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; THORACIC FLUID CONTENT; WEIGHT CHANGE; WEIGHT GAIN;

EID: 84872254987     PISSN: 03000605     EISSN: 14732300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030006051204000627     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL: Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1: 1.
2. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al: Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2564-2575.
3. Stewart RM, Park PK, Hunt JP, et al: Less is more: improved outcomes in surgical patients with conservative fluid administration and central venous catheter monitoring. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 725-735.
4. Madhok AB, Ojamaa K, Haridas V, et al: Cytokine response in children undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2006; 27: 408-413.
5. Paparella D, Yau TM, Young E: Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: pathophysiology and treatment. An update. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21: 232-244.
6. Hall RI, Smith MS, Rocker G: The systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: pathophysiological, therapeutic, and pharmacological considerations. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 766-782.
7. Tibby SM, Hatherill M, Marsh MJ, et al: Clinical validation of cardiac output measurements using femoral artery thermodilution with direct Fick in ventilated children and infants. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23: 987-991.
8. Tibby SM, Murdoch IA: Monitoring cardiac function in intensive care. Arch Dis Child 2003; 88: 46-52.
9. Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Beale R, Pfeiffer UJ: Central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, intrathoracic blood volume, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume as indicators of cardiac preload. J Crit Care 1996; 11: 180-188.
10. Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Keyl C, et al: Assessment of intrathoracic blood volume as an indicator of cardiac preload: single transpulmonary thermodilution techniqueversus assessment of pressure preload parameters derived from a pulmonary artery catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001; 15: 584-588.
11. Tibby SM, Hatherill M, Durward A, et al: Are transoesophageal Doppler parameters a reliable guide to paediatric haemodynamic status and fluid management? Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: 201-205.
12. Weisz DE, Jain A, McNamara PJ, et al: Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in neonates using bioreactance: a comparison with echocardiography. Neonatology 2012; 102: 61-67.
13. Proulx F, Lemson J, Choker G, et al: Hemodynamic monitoring by transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011; 12: 459-466.
14. López-Herce J, Bustinza A, Sancho L, et al: Cardiac output and blood volume parameters using femoral arterial thermodilution. Pediatr Int 2009; 51: 59-65.
15. Kossari N, Hufnagel G, Squara P: Bioreactance: a new tool for cardiac output and thoracic fluid content monitoring during hemodialysis. Hemodial Int 2009; 13: 512-517.
16. Karen H, Burkhoff D, Squara P: Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007; 293: H583-H589.
17. Marqué S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, et al: Comparison between FloTrac-Vigileo and bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care 2009; 13: 73.
18. He Z, Qiao H, Zhou W, et al: Assessment of cardiac preload status by pulse pressure variation in patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with central venous pressure and initial distribution volume of glucose. J Anesth 2011; 25: 812-817.
19. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B: Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? Asystematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134: 172-178.
20. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al: Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 691-699.
21. Baek SM, Makabali GG, Bryan-Brown CW, et al: Plasma expansion in surgical patients with high central venous pressure (CVP); the relationship of blood volume to hematocrit, CVP, pulmonary wedge pressure, and cardiorespiratory changes. Surgery 1975; 78: 304-315.
22. Shippy CR, Appel PL, Shoemaker WC: Reliability of clinical monitoring to assess bloodvolume in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1984; 12: 107-112.
23. Buhre W, Weyland A, Schorn B, et al: Changes in central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure do not indicate changes in right and left heart volume in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16: 11-17.
24. Mahajan A, Shabanie A, Turner J, et al: Pulse contour analysis for cardiac output monitoring in cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1283-1288.
25. Ballestero Y, López-Herce J, Urbano J, et al: Measurement of cardiac output in children by bioreactance. Pediatr Cardiol 2011; 32: 469-472.