Community response to noise

Noise and Health

Volumn 14, Issue 61, 2012, Pages 303-306

  Yano, Takashi ^a   Gjestland, Truls ^b   Lee, Soogab ^c  

^a KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b SINTEF   (Norway)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Annoyance; combined noise model; dose response relationships; railway bonus; soundscape

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HUMAN; IRRITABILITY; NOISE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TRAFFIC NOISE;

DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HUMANS; IRRITABLE MOOD; NOISE; NOISE, TRANSPORTATION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 84872192615     PISSN: 14631741     EISSN: 19984030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.104898     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. ISO 1996-1:2003. Acoustics -Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise -Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures.
2. Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON). Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues. Washington DC: Report for the Department of Defense; 1992.
3. ANSI S12.9-2008. Quantities and procedures for description and measurement of environmental sound. 2008.
4. European Commission. Position paper on dose-response relationships between transportation noise and annoyance. 2002.
5. Fields JM, de Jong RG, Brown AL, Flindell IH, Gjestland T, Job RS, et al. Guidelines for reporting core information from community noise reaction surveys. J Sound Vib 1997;206:685-95.
6. Fields JM, de Jong RG, Gjestland T, Flindell IH, Job RS, Kurra S, et al. Schumer, Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: Research and a recommendation. J Sound Vib 2001;242:641-79.
7. ISO/TS 15666. Acoustics -assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys. 2003.
8. Schultz TJ. Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;64:377-405.
9. Fidell S, Schultz TJ, Green DM. A theoretical interpretation of the prevalence rate of noise-induced annoyance in residential population. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;84:2109-13.
10. Fidell S, Barber DS, Schultz TJ. Updating a dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of annoyance due to general transportation noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;89:221-33.
11. Miedema HME, Vos H. Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:3432-45.
12. Lim C, Kim J, Hong J, Lee S. The relationship between railway noise and community annoyance in Korea. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;120:2037-42.
13. Yano T, Sato T, Morihara T. Dose-response relationships for road traffic, railway and aircraft noises in Kyushu and Hokkaido, Japan. Proceedings of Internoise 2007, CD-ROM. 2007.
14. Babisch W, Houthuijs D, Pershagen G, Cadum E, Katsouyanni K, Velonakis M, et al. Annoyance due to aircraft noise has increased over the years-results of the HYENA study. Environ Int 2009;35:1169-76.
15. Janssen SA, Vos H, van Kempen EE, Breugelmans OR, Miedema HM. Trends in aircraft noise annoyance: The role of study and sample characteristics. J Acoust Soc Am 2011;129:1953-62.
16. Gjestland T, Fidell S. Community response to noise -A theory based model for exposure-response relationships. London, UK: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. p. 673-9. Available from: http://www.icben.org/Congresses.html. [Last accessed on 2011].
17. Fidell S, Mestre V, Schomer P, Berry B, Gjestland T, Vallet M, et al. A first-principles model for estimating the prevalence of annoyance with aircraft noise exposure. J Acoust Soc Am 2011;130:791-806.
18. Brink M, Schaeffer B, Schreckenberg D, Basner M. Aircraft noise indexes -recent developments and current applications. London, UK: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. p. 703-10. Available from: http://www.icben.org/Congresses.html. [Last accessed on 2011].
19. Botteldooren D, de Coensel B, Oldoni D, Boes M, Lercher P. Biologically inspired modeling of environmental perception. London, UK: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. p. 680-5. Available from: http://www.icben.org/Congresses.html. [Last accessed on 2011].
20. Gidlof-Gunnarsson A, Ohrstrom E, Ogren M, Jerson T. Comparative studies on railway and road traffic noise annoyances and the importance of number of trains. London, UK: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. 686-94. Available from: http://www.icben.org/Congresses.html. [Last accessed on 2011].
21. Phan HY, Yano T, Phan HA, Nishimura T, Sato T, Hashimoto Y. Community response to road traffic noise in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. Appl Acoust 2012;71:107-14.
22. Nguyen TL, Yano T, Nguyen HQ, Nishimura T, Fukushima H, Sato T, et al. Community response to aircraft noise in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi. Appl Acoust 2011;72:814-22.
23. Nogueria RC, Mansur WJ, Sattler MA. Social survey about noise perception on Santos Dumont Airport neighbourhoods in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil -data collection and analysis method. London, UK: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. p. 838-44. Available from: http://www.icben.org/Congresses.html). [Last accessed on 2011].
24. Taylor SM. A comparison of models to predict annoyance reactions to noise from mixed sources. J Sound Vib 1982;81:123-38.
25. Hong J, Kim J, Kim K, Cho Y, Lee S. Quantitative model of combined annoyance caused by simultaneous exposure to outdoor traffic sounds. London, UK: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. p. 727-33. Available from: http://www.icben.org/ Congresses.html). [Last accessed on 2011].
26. Marquis-Favre C, Alayrac M, Viollon S. The adapted Vos's model to predict total noise annoyance due to an industrial noise with a main spectral component in middle frequencies combined with a background noise. London, UK: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. P. 869-77. Available from: http://www.icben.org/Congresses.html. [Last accessed on 2011].
27. Vos J. Annoyance caused by simultaneous impulse, road-traffic, and aircraft sounds: A quantitative model. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;91:3330-45.
28. Miedema HME. Relationship between exposure to multiple noise sources and noise annoyance. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;116:949-57.
29. Huy QN, Nguyen TL, Yano T, Nishimura Y, Nishimura S, Sato T, et al. Comparing models to predict the combined noise annoyance in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi. London, UK: Proc. of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. P. 767-74. Available from: http://www.icben.org/Congresses.html. [Last accessed on 2011].
30. Ohrstrom E, Skanberg A, Svensson H, Gidlof-Gunnarsson A. Effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness. J Sound Vib 2006;295:40-59.
31. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Ohrström E. Attractive "quiet" courtyards: A potential modifier of urban residents' responses to road traffic noise? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010;7:3359-75.
32. de Kluizenaar Y, Salomons EM, Janssen SA, van Lenthe FJ, Vos H, Zhou H, et al. Urban road traffic noise and annoyance: The effect of a quiet façade. J Acoust Soc Am 2011;130:1936-42.
33. Yang W, Kang J. Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces. Appl Acoust 2005;66;211-29.
34. Jeon JY, Lee PJ, You J, Kang J. Perceptual assessment of quality of urban soundscapes with combined noise sources and water sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;127:1357-66.
35. Jeon JY, Lee PJ. Evaluation of urban space as a concept of soundscape. London, UK: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. p. 743-51. Available from: http://www.icben.org/Congresses.html). [Last accessed on 2011].
36. Curcuruto S, Asdrubali F, Brambilla G, Silvaggio R, d'Alessandro F, Gallo V. Socio-acoustic survey and soundscape analysis in urban parks in Rome. London, UK: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. p. 830-7. Available from: http://www.icben.org/Congresses.html. [Last accessed on 2011].
37. Pedersen E, van den Berg F, Bakker R, Bouma J. Response to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;126:634-43.
38. Janssen SA, Vos H, Eisses AR, Pedersen E. A comparison between exposure-response relationships for wind turbine annoyance and annoyance due to other noise sources. J Acoust Soc Am 2011;130:3746-53.
39. Brown AL, van Kamp I. Response to a change in transport noise exposure: A review of evidence of a change effect. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;125:3018-29.
40. Laszlo HE, Hansell A. The types of human response to change in noise exposure. London, UK: Proc. of the 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN 2011); 2011. p. 695-701. Available from: http://www.icben.org/Congresses.html. [Last accessed on 2011].