Comparative studies on railway and road traffic noise annoyances and the importance of number of trains

Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics

Volumn 33 2, Issue PART 3, 2011, Pages 686-694

  Gidlof Gunnarsson A ^a   Ohrstrom E ^a   Ogren M ^b   Jerson, T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b Transport Research Institute   (Sweden)

^c WSP Acoustics   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866694067     PISSN: 14786095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. EU (2002). Position paper on dose response relationships between transportation noise and annoyance. EU's Future Noise Policy, WG2 -Dose/Effect. European Communities, 2002.
2. Fields JM, Walker JG (1982). Comparing the relationship between noise level and annoyance in different surveys: a railway noise vs. aircraft and road traffic comparison. J Sound Vibr 81: 51-80.
3. Jonasson H, Nielsen HK (1996). Road traffic noise -Nordic prediction method. In: Nordic Council of Ministers, Tema Nord. Copenhagen, Denmark, Vol 525.
4. Lim C, Kim J, Hong J, Lee S (2006). The relationship between railway noise and community annoyance in Korea. J Acoust Soc Am 120: 2037-2042.
5. Miedema HME, Oudshoorn C (2001). Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ Health Perspect 109: 409-416.
6. Moehler U (1988). Community response to railway noise: A review of social surveys. J Sound Vibr 120: 321-332.
7. Moehler U, Greven LM (2005). Community response to railway and road traffic noise -a review on German field studies. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2005, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 7-10, 2005.
8. Morihara T, Yano T, Sato T (2002). Comparison of dose-response relationships between railway and road traffic noises in Kyushu and Hokkaido, Japan. In: Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2002, Dearborn, MI, USA.
9. Öhrström E (1990). Störning fran tagbuller -översikt och analys. [Annoyance from railway noise -overview and analysis]. Report 6/90. Department of Environmental Medicine, Gothenburg University (In Swedish).
10. Öhrström E, Skanberg A (2006). Literature review -Effects of noise and vibrations from railway and road traffic, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg. Report 112.
11. Öhrström E, Skanberg A, Svensson H, Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A (2006). Effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness. J Sound Vibr 295: 40-59.
12. Öhrström E, Barregard B, Andersson E et al. (2007). Annoyance due to single and combined exposure from railway and road traffic noise. J Acoust Soc Am 122: 2642-2652.
13. Öhrström E, Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Ögren M et al. (2010). Comparative field studies on the effects of railway and road traffic noise. In: Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2010, Lisbon, Portugal, June 13-16, 2010.
14. Technical Specification, Acoustics -International Standard ISO/TS15666. Assessment of Noise Annoyance by Means of Social and Socio-Acoustic Surveys. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.