In vitro and in vivo imaging of prostate cancer angiogenesis using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antibody-conjugated quantum dot

Korean Journal of Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 30-37

  Kwon, Haejin ^a   Lee, Jiyeon ^a   Song, Rita ^a   Hwang, Sung Il ^b   Lee, Junghan ^a   Kim, Young Hwa ^c   Lee, Hak Jong ^b  

^a Institute Pasteur Korea   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Angiogenesis; Near infrared; Prostate cancer; Quantum dot; VEGFR2

Indexed keywords

1 (3 DIMETHYLAMINOPROPYL) 3 ETHYLCARBODIIMIDE; QUANTUM DOT; SUCCINIMIDE DERIVATIVE; SULFO(N HYDROXYSULFOSUCCINIMIDE); UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VASCULOTROPIN RECEPTOR 2 ANTIBODY CONJUGATED QUANTUM DOT;

AGAR GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BINDING KINETICS; CELL INTERACTION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DRUG CONJUGATION; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PROSTATE CANCER; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION; TUMOR XENOGRAFT;

ANGIOGENESIS; NEAR INFRARED; PROSTATE CANCER; QUANTUM DOT; VEGFR2;

ANIMALS; CARBODIIMIDES; CELL LINE, TUMOR; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELECTROPHORESIS, AGAR GEL; FLUORESCENCE; MALE; MICE; MICE, NUDE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PATHOLOGIC; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUANTUM DOTS; SUCCINIMIDES; TRANSPLANTATION, HETEROLOGOUS; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR-2;

EID: 84872188982     PISSN: 12296929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.1.30     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med 1971;285:1182-1186
2. Oostendorp M, Douma K, Hackeng TM, Dirksen A, Post MJ, van Zandvoort MA, et al. Quantitative molecular magnetic resonance imaging of tumor angiogenesis using cNGR-labeled paramagnetic quantum dots. Cancer Res 2008;68:7676-7683
3. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat Med 2003;9:653-660
4. Meitar D, Crawford SE, Rademaker AW, Cohn SL. Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastatic disease, N-myc amplification, and poor outcome in human neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:405-414
5. Daldrup H, Shames DM, Wendland M, Okuhata Y, Link TM, Rosenau W, et al. Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:941-949
6. Massoud TF, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light. Genes Dev 2003;17:545-580
7. Mulder WJ, Castermans K, van Beijnum JR, Oude Egbrink MG, Chin PT, Fayad ZA, et al. Molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis using alphavbeta3-integrin targeted multimodal quantum dots. Angiogenesis 2009;12:17-24
8. Zhang H, Yee D, Wang C. Quantum dots for cancer diagnosis and therapy: biological and clinical perspectives. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2008;3:83-91
9. Willmann JK, Paulmurugan R, Chen K, Gheysens O, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Lutz AM, et al. US imaging of tumor angiogenesis with microbubbles targeted to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 in mice. Radiology 2008;246:508-518
10. Yang YA, Wu H, Williams KR, Cao YC. Synthesis of CdSe and CdTe nanocrystals without precursor injection. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2005;44:6712-6715
11. Lee J, Choi Y, Kim K, Hong S, Park HY, Lee T, et al. Characterization and cancer cell specific binding properties of anti-EGFR antibody conjugated quantum dots. Bioconjug Chem 2010;21:940-946
12. Schellenberger EA, Bogdanov A Jr, Petrovsky A, Ntziachristos V, Weissleder R, Josephson L. Optical imaging of apoptosis as a biomarker of tumor response to chemotherapy. Neoplasia 2003;5:187-192
13. Deshpande N, Pysz MA, Willmann JK. Molecular ultrasound assessment of tumor angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 2010;13:175-188
14. Hicklin DJ, Ellis LM. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1011-1027
15. Smith AM, Duan H, Mohs AM, Nie S. Bioconjugated quantum dots for in vivo molecular and cellular imaging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008;60:1226-1240
16. Kim S, Lim YT, Soltesz EG, De Grand AM, Lee J, Nakayama A, et al. Near-infrared fluorescent type II quantum dots for sentinel lymph node mapping. Nat Biotechnol 2004;22:93-97
17. Bentolila LA, Ebenstein Y, Weiss S. Quantum dots for in vivo small-animal imaging. J Nucl Med 2009;50:493-496
18. Chen K, Li ZB, Wang H, Cai W, Chen X. Dual-modality optical and positron emission tomography imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor on tumor vasculature using quantum dots. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:2235-2244
19. Zhang H, Zeng X, Li Q, Gaillard-Kelly M, Wagner CR, Yee D. Fluorescent tumour imaging of type I IGF receptor in vivo: comparison of antibody-conjugated quantum dots and smallmolecule fluorophore. Br J Cancer 2009;101:71-79
20. Chen LD, Liu J, Yu XF, He M, Pei XF, Tang ZY, et al. The biocompatibility of quantum dot probes used for the targeted imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. Biomaterials 2008;29:4170-4176
21. Weidner N, Carroll PR, Flax J, Blumenfeld W, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. Am J Pathol 1993;143:401-409
22. Schlemmer HP, Merkle J, Grobholz R, Jaeger T, Michel MS, Werner A, et al. Can pre-operative contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for prostate cancer predict microvessel density in prostatectomy specimens? Eur Radiol 2004;14:309-317
23. Gao X, Cui Y, Levenson RM, Chung LW, Nie S. In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol 2004;22:969-976
24. Cai W, Chen K, Li ZB, Gambhir SS, Chen X. Dual-function probe for PET and near-infrared fluorescence imaging of tumor vasculature. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1862-1870
25. Cai W, Shin DW, Chen K, Gheysens O, Cao Q, Wang SX, et al. Peptide-labeled near-infrared quantum dots for imaging tumor vasculature in living subjects. Nano Lett 2006;6:669-676
26. Hardman R. A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:165-172
27. Ipe BI, Lehnig M, Niemeyer CM. On the generation of free radical species from quantum dots. Small 2005;1:706-709
28. Lovrić J, Cho SJ, Winnik FM, Maysinger D. Unmodified cadmium telluride quantum dots induce reactive oxygen species formation leading to multiple organelle damage and cell death. Chem Biol 2005;12:1227-1234
29. Jun HY, Yin HH, Kim SH, Park SH, Kim HS, Yoon KH. Visualization of tumor angiogenesis using MR imaging contrast agent Gd-DTPA-anti-VEGF receptor 2 antibody conjugate in a mouse tumor model. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:449-456
30. Ko EY, Lee SH, Kim HH, Kim SM, Shin MJ, Kim N, et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with a second-generation US contrast medium in a rat breast tumor model. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:243-249
31. Kim JW, Jeong YY, Chang NK, Heo SH, Shin SS, Lee JH, et al. Perfusion CT in colorectal cancer: comparison of perfusion parameters with tumor grade and microvessel density. Korean J Radiol 2012;13 Suppl 1:S89-S97