Pinch-off syndrome: Transection of implantable central venous access device

BMJ Case Reports

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Sugimoto, Takuya ^a   Nagata, Hiroshi ^a   Hayashi, Ken ^a   Kano, Nobuyasu ^a  

^a KAMEDA MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CASE REPORT; CATHETER OCCLUSION; CATHETER REMOVAL; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY SINUS; DEVICE INFECTION; EXTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN; FEMALE; FEMORAL VEIN; HEART RIGHT ATRIUM; HUMAN; PINCH OFF SYNDROME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM CANCER; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; VEIN THROMBOSIS;

EID: 84872186582     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1757790X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2012-006584     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Mirza B, Vanek VW, Kupensky DT. Pinch-off syndrome: case report and collective review of the literature. Am Surg 2004;70:635-44.
2. Surov A, Wienke A, Carter JM, et al. Intravascular embolization of venous catheter-causes, clinical signs, and management: a systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2009;33:677-85.
3. Hinke DH, Zandt-Stastny DA, Goodman LR, et al. Pinch-off syndrome: a complication of implantable subclavian venous access devices. Radiology 1990;177:353-6. (Pubitemid 20374848)
4. Magney JE, Flynn DM, Parsons JA, et al. Anatomical mechanisms explaining damage to pacemaker leads, defibrillator leads, and failure of central venous catheters adjacent to the sternoclavicular joint. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1993;16:445-57.
5. Di Carlo I, Barbagallo F, Toro A, et al. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:570-3. (Pubitemid 40898040)
6. Sakamoto N, Arai Y, Takeuchi M, et al. Ultrasound-guided radiological placement of central venous port via the subclavian vein: a retrospective analysis of 500 cases at a single institute. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010;33:989-94.
7. Poorter RL, Lauw FN, Bemelman WA, et al. Complications of an implantable venous access device (Port-a-Cath) during intermittent continuous infusion of chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 1996;32:2262-6.
8. Nightingale CE, Norman A, Conningham D, et al. A prospective analysis of 949 long-term central venous access catheters for ambulatory chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy. Eur J Cancer 1997;33:398-403. (Pubitemid 27168065)
9. Bessoud B, de Baere T, Kuoch V, et al. Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:527-32. (Pubitemid 36135046)
10. Fisher RG, Ferreyro R. Evaluation of current techniques for nonsurgical removal of intravascular iatrogenic foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978;130:541-8. (Pubitemid 8296385)