Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences: An analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 59, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1366-1382

  Bensman, Stephen J ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMPACT FACTOR (IF); JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH); NEGATIVE BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTIONS; PROBABILISTIC STRUCTURES; RARE EVENTS; SCIENCE CITATION INDEX (SCI);

CABLE STAYED BRIDGES; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PROBABILITY; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 47049113271     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20810     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adams, D. (2002). The counting house. Nature, 415 (6873), 726-729.
2. Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (Jonathan Barnes, Ed., Vols. 1-2). Bollingen series, 71(2). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Begley, S. (2006, June 5). Science journals artfully try to boost their ranking. The Wall Street Journal, p. B1.
4. Bensman, S. J. (1996). The structure of the library market for scientific journals: The case of chemistry. Library Resources & Technical Services, 40 (2), 145-170.
5. Bensman, S.J. (2000). Probability distributions in library and information science: A historical and practitioner viewpoint. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (9), 816-833.
6. Bensman, S.J. (2007a). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 93-155.
7. Bensman, S.J. (2007b). Garfield and the impact factor: The creation, utilization, and validation of a citation measure: Part 2, The probabilistic, statistical, and sociological bases of the measure. Unpublished manuscript. Available at http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/bensman/bensmanegif22007.pdf
8. Bensman, S.J. (2007c). The impact factor, total citations, and better citation mouse traps: A commentary. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (12), 1904-1908.
9. Bensman, S.J., & Wilder, S. J. (1998). Scientific and technical serials holdings optimization in an inefficient market: A LSU serials redesign project exercise. Library Resources & Technical Services, 42 (3), 147-242.
10. Bernal, J.D. (1940). The social function of science (2nd corrected ed.) London: George Routledge.
11. Beyer, W.H. (1968). CRC handbook of tables for probability and statistics (2nd ed.). Cleveland, Ohio: Chemical Rubber Co.
12. Cartter, A.M. (1966). An assessment of quality in graduate education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
13. Cattell, J. M. (1910). A further statistical study of American men of science. Science, 32(828), 672-688.
14. Chan, L.M. (1999). A guide to the Library of Congress Classification (5th ed.). Library and information science text series. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
15. 2 tests. Biometrics, 10(4), 417-451.
16. Cole, S. (2000). The role of journals in the growth of scientific knowledge. In B. Cronin & H.B. Atkins (Eds.), The Web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 109-142). ASIS monograph series. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
17. Coleman, J.S. (1964). Introduction to mathematical sociology. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
18. Eggenberger, F., & Pólya, G. (1984)._ber die Statistik verketteter Vorgänge. In G. Pólya [Probability; Combinatorics; Teaching and learning in mathematics]. (G.-C. Rota, Ed., pp. 94-104). Collected papers / George Pólya, Vol. 4. Mathematicians of our times, Vol. 22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Elliott, J.M. (1977). Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates (2nd ed.). Freshwater Biological Association, 25.
20. Feller, W. (1943). On a general class of "contagious" distributions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14(4), 389-400.
21. Fisher, R.A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. Biological monographs and manuals, 5. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
22. Garfield, E. (1970, April 22). Calling attention to Chauncey D. Leake - Renaissance scholar extraordinaire. Current Contents, 16, 5-6.
23. Garfield, E. (1972a). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178 (4060), 471-479.
24. Garfield, E. (1972b, February 23). Citations-to divided by items-published gives journal impact factor; ISI lists the top fifty high-impact journals of science. Current Contents, 7, 5-8.
25. Garfield, E. (1973, Sept. 26). Which journals attract the most frequently cited articles? Here's a list of the top fifteen. Current Contents, 39, 5-6.
26. Garfield, E. (1976a). Significant journals of science. Nature, 264 (5587), 609-615
27. Garfield, E. (1976b, Feb. 9). Is the ratio between number of citations and publications cited a true constant? Current Contents, 6, 5-7.
28. Garfield, E. (1978, Feb. 13). To remember Chauncey D. Leake. Current Contents, 7, 5-15.
29. Garfield, E. (1987a). Oral history: Transcript of an interview conducted by Arnold Thackray and Jeffrey Sturchio at the Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA, on 16 November 1987. Philadelphia: Beckman Center for the History of Chemistry.
30. Garfield, E. (1987b, May 4). Reviewing review literature: Part 1, Definitions and uses of reviews. Current Contents, 18, 5-8.
31. Garfield, E. (1991, Sept. 2). In truth, the 'flood' of scientific literature is only a myth. The Scientist, 5(17), 11.
32. Garfield, E. (1996, Sept. 2), The significant scientific literature appears in a small core of journals. The Scientist, 10(17), 13.
33. Garfield, E. (2000). Interview with Eugene Garfield. Medical Writing, 8(1). Retrieved July 20, 2005, from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/ papers/medicalwritingv8(1)1999.html.
34. Garfield, E. (2005). The agony and the ecstasy-The history and meaning of the journal impact factor: Paper presented at the International Conference on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. Retrieved November 18, 2005, from http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/jifchicago2005.pdf
35. Garfield, E., & Sher, I.H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195-201.
36. Goldberger, M.L., Maher, B. A., & Flattau, P. E. (Eds.). Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37. Graham, H.D., & Diamond, N. (1997). The rise of American research universities: Elites and challengers in the postwar era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Greenwood, M., & Yule, G.Y. (1920). An inquiry into the nature of frequency distributions representative of multiple happenings with particular reference to the occurrence of multiple attacks of disease or of repeated accidents. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 83(2), 255-279.
39. Grieg-Smith, P. (1983). Quantitative plant ecology (3rd ed.). Studies in ecology, Vol. 9. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40. Institute for Scientific Information. (2005) Journal citations reports help. Philadelphia, PA.: Institute for Scientific Information. Available to subscribers at http://portal.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi?DestApp=JCR&Func= Frame
41. Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P. E. (Eds.). (1982). An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States: Social & behavioral sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. Joseph, K.S., & Hoey, J. (1999). CMAJ's impact factor: Room for recalculation. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8), 977-978.
43. Kotz S., & Johnson. N.L. (Eds.). (1982). Discrete distribution. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 2. pp. 387-388). New York: Wiley.
44. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., enlarged). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Martyn, J., & Gilchrist, A. (1968). An evaluation of British scientific Journals. London: Aslib.
46. Monastersky, R. (2005, Oct. 14). The number that's devouring science. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A12-A7.
47. Moroney, M.J. (1956). Facts from figures (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
48. National Academies U.S. (2006). Taxonomy of fields. Retrieved November 29, 2007, from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/resdoc/Taxonomy_list.html
49. The Oxford English Dictionary Online. (2007). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Available at http://dictionary.oed.com/
50. Pearson, E.S., & Hartley, H.O. (Eds.). (1966). Biometrika tables for statisticians (3rd ed., Vol. 1.). Cambridge: University Press.
51. Reingold, N. (1971). Cattell, James McKeen. In C.C. Gillispie (Ed.), Dictionary of scientific biography (Vol. 3, pp. 130-131). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
52. Roose, K. D., & Andersen, C. J. (1970). A rating of graduate programs. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
53. Royal Society. (1948). The Royal Society Scientific Information Conference, June 21- July 2, 1948, London:Author.
54. Scott, M.L. (1998). Dewey Decimal Classification, 21st ed.: A study manual and number building guide. Englewood, CO.: Libraries Unlimited.
55. Seglen, P.O. (1992). How representative is the journal impact factor. Research Evaluation, 2 (3), 143-149.
56. Seglen, P.O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 497.
57. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58. Snedecor, G.W., & Cochran, W.G. (1989). Statistical methods (8th ed.). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
59. Sokal, M. M. (1995). Stargazing: James McKeen Cattell, American men of science, and the reward structure of the American scientific community, 1906-1944. In F. Kessel (Ed.), Psychology, science, and human affairs: Essays in honor of William Bevan (pp. 64-85). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
60. "Student." (1919). An explanation of deviations from Poisson's Law in practice. Biometrika, 12, 211-215.