The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 15-28

  Glyde, Helen ^a,b,c   Cameron, Sharon ^a,b   Dillon, Harvey ^a,b   Hickson, Louise ^a,c   Seeto, Mark ^a,b  

^a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering   (Australia)

^b NATIONAL ACOUSTIC LABORATORIES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEARING; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NOISE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERY ELDERLY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; COGNITION; HEARING; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; NOISE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872173896     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182617f94     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arbogast, T. L., Mason, C. R., Kidd, G. Jr. (2005). The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 117(4 Pt 1), 2169-2180 (Pubitemid 40570475)
2. Ahlstrom, J. B., Horwitz, A. R., Dubno, J. R. (2009). Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS. Ear Hear, 30, 203-218
3. Alain, C. (2007). Breaking the wave: Effects of attention and learning on concurrent sound perception. Hear Res, 229, 225-236 (Pubitemid 46920881)
4. Anderson, K. L., & Smaldino, J. J. (1998). The Listening Inventory For Education: An efficacy tool. Student appraisal of listening difficulty. Educational Audiology Association
5. Bamiou, D. E. (2007). Measures of binaural interaction. In F. E. Musiek & G. D. Chermak (Eds). Handbook of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder. Volume 1. Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis (pp. 257-286). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing
6. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
7. Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Tran, K., et al. (1994). An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2108-2120 (Pubitemid 24311638)
8. Byrne, D., Parkinson, A., Newall, P. (1990). Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. Ear Hear, 11, 40-49 (Pubitemid 20130644)
9. Cameron, S., Brown, D., Keith, R., et al. (2009). Development of the North American Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences test (NA LiSN-S): Sentence equivalence, normative data, and test-retest reliability studies. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 128-146
10. Cameron, S., & Dillon, H. (2007). Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S). Ear Hear, 28, 196-211 (Pubitemid 46673497)
11. Cameron, S., & Dillon, H. (2008). The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): Comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 377-391
12. Cameron, S., & Dillon, H. (2009). Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences test (LiSN-S) (Version 1.014) [Computer software]. Murten, Switzerland: Phonak Communications AG.
13. Cameron, S., & Dillon, H. (2011). Development and evaluation of the LiSN & learn auditory training software for deficit-specific remediation of binaural processing deficits in children: Preliminary findings. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 678-696
14. Cameron, S., Glyde, H., Dillon, H. (2011). Listening in Spatialized Noise- Sentences Test (LiSN-S): Normative and retest reliability data for adolescents and adults up to 60 years of age. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 697-709
15. Ching, T. Y., van Wanrooy, E., Dillon, H., et al. (2011). Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 368-375
16. Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychon Bull & Review, 3, 422-433 (Pubitemid 126421538)
17. Dillon, H. (2001). Hearing Aids. Sydney, Australia: Boomerang Press
18. Divenyi, P. L., & Haupt, K. M. (1997). Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. III. Factor representation. Ear Hear, 18, 189-201 (Pubitemid 27265811)
19. Divenyi, P. L., Stark, P. B., Haupt, K. M. (2005). Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 1089-1100 (Pubitemid 41129241)
20. Dubno, J. R., Ahistrom, J. B., Horwitz, A. R. (2002). Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 1297-1310 (Pubitemid 36034163)
21. Durrleman, S., & Simon, R. (1989). Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med, 8, 551-561 (Pubitemid 19116001)
22. Gatehouse, S., & Noble, W. (2004). The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85-99 (Pubitemid 38295489)
23. Gates, G. A., & Mills, J. H. (2005). Presbycusis. Lancet, 366, 1111-1120 (Pubitemid 41338766)
24. Gelfand, S. A., Ross, L., Miller, S. (1988). Sentence reception in noise from one versus two sources: Effects of aging and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 248-256 (Pubitemid 18036639)
25. Glyde, H., Hickson, L., Cameron, S., et al. (2011). Problems hearing in noise in older adults: A review of spatial processing disorder. Trends Amplif, 15, 116-126
26. Hafter, E. R. (2010). Is there a hearing aid for the thinking person? J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 594-600
27. Keidser, G., Dillon, H., Convery, E., et al. (2010). Differences between speech-shaped test stimuli in analyzing systems and the effect on measured hearing aid gain. Ear Hear, 31, 437-440
28. Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection. Psychol Aging, 9, 339-355 (Pubitemid 24301668)
29. Lunner, T. (2003). Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol, 42(Suppl 1), S49-S58 (Pubitemid 41626010)
30. Marrone, N., Mason, C. R., Kidd, G. Jr. (2008). Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem. Trends Amplif, 12, 300-315
31. Mueller, J., Kiernan, R., Langston, J. W. (2001). Cognistat: The neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination. Fairfax, VA: The Northern Californian Neurobehavioral Group
32. Mueller, J., Kiernan, R., Langston, J. W. (2009). Cognistat Manual (The neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination. Fairfax, VA: The Northern Californian Neurobehavioral Group
33. Murphy, D. R., Daneman, M., Schneider, B. A. (2006). Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations? Psychol Aging, 21, 49-61 (Pubitemid 44212046)
34. Ruchinskas, R. A., & Curyto, K. J. (2003). Cognitive screening in geriatric rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol, 48, 14-22 (Pubitemid 36206271)
35. Schmiedt, R. A. (2010). The physiology of cochlear presbycusic. In S. Gordon-Salant, R. D. Frisina, A. N. Popper, R. R. Fay (Eds). The Aging Auditory System (pp. 9-38). New York, NY: Springer
36. Warren, L. R., Wagener, J. W., Herman, G. E. (1978). Binaural analysis in the aging auditory system. J Gerontol, 33, 731-736 (Pubitemid 9004972)