Patient-clinician information engagement increases treatment decision satisfaction among cancer patients through feeling of being informed

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 384-390

  Martinez, Lourdes S ^a   Schwartz, J Sanford ^b   Freres, Derek ^a   Fraze, Taressa ^a   Hornik, Robert C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Feeling informed; Patient clinician communication; Treatment decision satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COLON CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REGISTRIES;

EID: 70549095745     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Nagler RH, Gray SW, Romantan A, Kelly BJ, DeMichele A, Armstrong K, Schwartz JS, Hornik RC. Differences in information seeking among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients: Results from a population-based survey. In preparation.
2. Rutten L.J.F., Arora N.K., Bakos A.D., Aziz N., and Rowland J. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980-2003). Patient Educ Couns 57 (2005) 250-261
3. Hoffman R.M., Hunt W.C., Gilliland F.D., Stephenson R.A., and Potosky A.L. Patient satisfaction with treatment decisions for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. Cancer 97 (2003) 1653-1662
4. Albrecht G., and Hoogstraten J. Satisfaction as a determinant of compliance. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 26 (1998) 139-146
5. McCracken L.M., Klock A., Mingay D.J., Asbury J.K., and Sinclair D.M. Assessment of satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 14 (1997) 292-299
6. Weaver M., Patrick D.L., Markson L.E., Martin D., Frederic I., and Berger M. Issues in the measurement of satisfaction with treatment. Am J Manag Care 3 (1997) 579-594
7. Kovac J.A., Patel S.S., Peterson R.A., and Kimmel P.L. Patient satisfaction with care and behavioral compliance in end-stage renal disease patients treated with hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 39 (2002) 1236-1244
8. Wright S. Patient satisfaction in the context of cancer care. Irish J Psychol 19 (1998) 274-282
9. Hart S.L., Latini D.M., Cowan J.E., and Carroll P.R. Fear of recurrence, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 16 (2008) 161-169
10. Houston T.K., and Ehrenberger H.E. The potential of consumer health informatics. Semin Oncol Nurs 17 (2001) 41-48
11. Grove A. The X-factor. J Amer Med Assoc 280 (1998) 1294
12. Levine S.R. Consumer-driven health care: a path to achieving shared goals. Physician Exec 26 (2000) 10-16
13. Rossiter J. Web watch. Health Manage Technol 21 (2000) 76
14. Johnson J.D. Cancer-related information seeking (1997), Hampton Press, Inc., Cresskill, NJ
15. Siminoff L.A., Fetting J.H., and Abeloff M.D. Doctor-patient communication about breast cancer adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 7 (1989) 1192-1200
16. Epstein RM, Street RL Jr. Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication No. 07-6225. Bethesda, MD, 2007.
17. Cecil D.W., and Killeen I. Control, compliance, and satisfaction in the family practice encounter. Fam Med 29 (1997) 653-657
18. Rao J.K., Weinberger M., and Kroenke K. Visit-specific expectations and patient-centered outcomes: a literature review. Arch Fam Med 9 (2000) 1148-1155
19. Wong F., Stewart D.E., Dancey J., Meana M., McAndrews M.P., Bunston T., and Cheung A.M. Men with prostate cancer: influence of psychological factors on informational needs and decision making. J Psychosom Res 49 (2000) 13-19
20. Armstrong K., Weber B., Ubel P.A., Peters N., Holmes J., and Schwartz J.S. Individualized survival curves improve satisfaction with cancer risk management decisions in women with brca1/2 mutations. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 9319-9328
21. Rimer B., Jones W.L., Keintz M.L., Catalano R.B., and Engstrom P.F. Informed consent: a critical step in cancer patient education. Health Educ Q 10 Suppl. (1984) S30-S42
22. Degner L.F., Kristjanson L.J., Bowman D., Sloan L.A., Carriere O'Neil K.C., Bilodeau B., Watson P., and Mueller B. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. J Amer Med Assoc 277 (1997) 1485-1492
23. Ravdin P.M., Siminoff L.A., and Harvey J.A. Survey of breast cancer patients concerning their knowledge and expectations of adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 16 (1998) 515-521
24. Lee R.G., and Garvin T. Moving from information transfer to information exchange in health and health care. Soc Sci Med 56 (2003) 449-464
25. Berry D.L., Ellis W.J., Russell K.J., Blasko J.C., Bush N., Blumenstein B., and Lange P.H. Factors that predict choice and satisfaction with decision in men with localized prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 5 (2006) 219-226
26. O'Conner A., and O'Brien-Pallas L. Decisional conflict. In: McFarland G., and McFarlane E. (Eds). Nursing diagnosis and intervention (1989), CV Mosby, Ontario, Canada 573
27. Holmes-Rovner M., Kroll J., Schmitt N., Rovner D.R., Breer M.L., Rothert M.L., Padoni G., and Talaczyk G. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Making 16 (1996) 58-64
28. Dillman D.A. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method (2000), Wiley, New York
29. Allison P.D. Missing data. Sage university papers series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 7-136 (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
30. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata J 4 (2004) 227-241
31. Mackinnon D.P., Lockwood C.M., Hoffmann J.M., West S.G., and Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 7 (2002) 83-104
32. Baron R.M., and Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51 (1986) 1173-1182
33. Sobel M.E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In: Leinhart S. (Ed). Sociological methodology 1982 (1982), Jossy-Bass, San Francisco 290-312
34. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
35. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 4th edition (2006), AAPOR, Lenexa, Kansas