Structural processing and category-specific deficits

Cortex

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 266-275

  Marques, J Frederico ^a   Raposo, Ana ^a   Almeida, Jorge ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Category specific deficits; Object parts; Objects contours; Variability of the representation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CASE REPORT; FRUIT; HUMAN; IMAGERY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 84872122304     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alario F.-X., Ferrand L., Laganaro M., New B., Frauenfelder U.H., Segui J. Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2004, 36(1):140-155.
2. Barry C., Morrison C.M., Ellis A.W. Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 1997, 50(3):560-585.
3. Bonin P., Chalard M., Méot A., Fayol M. The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology 2002, 93(Pt 1):89-114.
4. Capitani E., Laiacona M., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20(3/4/5/6):307-326.
5. Coppens P., Frisinger D. Category-specific naming effect in non-brain-damaged individuals. Brain and Language 2005, 94(1):61-71.
6. Cree G.S., McRae K. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132(2):163-201.
7. Farah M., McMullen P., Meyer M. Can the recognition of living things be selectively impaired?. Neuropsychologia 1991, 29(2):185-193.
8. Forde E.M.E., Humphreys G.W. Category-specific recognition impairments: A review of important case studies and influential theories. Aphasiology 1999, 13(3):169-193.
9. Forsythe A., Mulhern G., Sawey M. Confounds in pictorial sets: The role of complexity and familiarity in basic-level picture processing. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40(1):116-129.
10. Funnell E., Sheridan J. Categories of knowledge: Unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1992, 9(2):135-153.
11. Gainotti G., Silveri M.C. Cognitive and anatomical locus of lesion in a patient with a category-specific impairment for living beings. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1996, 13(3):357-389.
12. Gale T.M., Laws K. Category-specificity can emerge from bottom-up visual characteristics: Evidence from a modular neural network. Brain and Cognition 2006, 61(3):269-279.
13. Gale T.M., Laws K., Foley K. Crowded and sparse domains in object recognition: Consequences for categorization and naming. Brain and Cognition 2006, 60(2):139-145.
14. Gerlach C. Category-specificity in visual object recognition. Cognition 2009, 111(3):281-301.
15. Hillis A.E., Caramazza A. Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain and Language 1991, 114(Pt 5):2081-2084.
16. Humphreys G.W., Forde E.M.E. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: " Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:453-509.
17. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J. A case series analysis of " category-specific" deficits of living things: The HIT account. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20(3-6):263-306.
18. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J., Quinlan P.T. Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1988, 5(1):67-104.
19. Kiefer M. Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Memory and Cognition 2001, 29(1):100-116.
20. Kurbat M.A. Can the recognition of living things really be selectively impaired?. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35(6):813-827.
21. Låg T. Category-specific effects in object identification: What is 'normal'?. Cortex 2001, 41(6):833-841.
22. Laws K.R., Gale T.M. Category-specific naming and the 'visual' characteristics of line drawn stimuli. Cortex 2002, 38(1):7-21.
23. Laws K.R., Gale T.M., Frank R., Davey N. Visual similarity is greater for line drawings of nonliving than living things: The importance of musical instruments and body parts. Brain & Cognition 2002, 48(2-3):421-424.
24. Laws K.R., Hunter M.Z. The impact of colour, spatial resolution, and presentation speed on category naming. Brain & Cognition 2006, 62(2):89-97.
25. Laws K.R., Neve C. A 'normal' category-specific advantage for naming living things. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37(11):1263-1269.
26. Lloyd-Jones T.J., Nettlemill M. Sources of error in picture naming under time pressure. Memory and Cognition 2007, 35(4):816-836.
27. Magnié M.N., Besson M., Poncet M., Dolisi C. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: Norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects and nonobjects. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2003, 25(4):521-560.
28. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:27-51.
29. Marques J.F., Raposo A. Structural dimensions of object pictures: Organization and relation to object decision and naming. Visual Cognition 2011, 19(6):705-729.
30. Maruyama G.M. Basics of Structural Equation Modeling 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
31. Nishimoto T., Miyawaki K., Ueda T., Une Y., Takahashi M. Japanese normative set of 359 pictures. Behavior Research Methods 2005, 37(3):398-416.
32. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W. Object identification in simultanagnosia: When wholes are not the sum of their parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2004, 21(2):423-441.
33. Sachett C., Humphreys G.W. Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: A category-specific deficit for artifactual objects and body parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1992, 9(1):73-86.
34. Snodgrass J.G., Yuditsky T. Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1996, 28(4):516-536.
35. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980, 6(2):174-215.
36. Tranel D., Logan C.G., Frank R.J., Damasio A.R. Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: Operationalization and analysis of factors. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35(10):1329-1339.
37. Turnbull O.H., Laws K.R. Loss of stored knowledge of object structure: Implications for 'category-specific' deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2000, 17(4):365-389.
38. Warrington E.K., McCarthy R.A. Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 1987, 110(Pt 5):1273-1296.
39. Warrington E.K., Shallice T. Category-specific semantic impairments. Brain 1984, 107(Pt 3):829-853.