Sources of error in picture naming under time pressure

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 816-836

  Lloyd Jones, Toby J ^a   Nettlemill, Mandy ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGEABILITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SEMANTIC MEMORY; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 34547899127     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193317     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. ARGUIN, M. (2002). Visual processing and the dissociation between biological and man-made categories. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category specificity in brain and mind (pp. 85-110). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
2. BARRY, C., HIRSH, K. W., JOHNSTON, R. A., & WILLIAMS, C. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 350-375.
3. BARRY, C., MORRISON, C. M., & ELLIS, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 560-585.
4. BATES, E., D'AMICO, S., JACOBSEN, T., SZÉKELY, A., ANDONOVA, E., DEVESCOVI, A., ET AL. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 344-380.
5. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-117.
6. BUB, D., & GUM, T. (1988). PsychLab manual. Montreal: Montreal Neurological Institute.
7. CAPITANI, E., LAIACONA, M., MAHON, B., & CARAMAZZA, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 213-261.
8. CARAMAZZA, A., HILLIS, A. E., RAPP, B. C., & ROMANI, C. (1990). The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 161-189.
9. CARAMAZZA, A., & MAHON, B. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: The evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 354-361.
10. CARAMAZZA, A., & SHELTON, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34.
11. CARRASCO, M., & SEAMON, J. G. (1996). Priming impossible figures in the object decision test: The critical importance of perceived stimulus complexity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 344-351.
12. CARROLL, J. B., & WHITE, N. M. (1973). Age of acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 563-576.
13. CREE, G. S., & MCRAE, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 163-201.
14. CUTZU, F., & TARR, M. (1999). Inferring perceptual saliency fields from viewpoint-dependent recognition date. Neural Compulation, 11, 1331-1348.
15. DEVLIN, J. T., GONNERMAN, L. M., ANDERSEN, E. S., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1998). Category-specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: A computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 77-94.
16. DIXON, M. J., BUB, D. N., & ARGUIN, M. (1997). The interaction of object form and object meaning in the identification performance of a patient with category-specific agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 1085-1130.
17. ELLIS, A. W., & LAMBON RALPH, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1103-1123.
18. ELLIS, A. W., & MORRISON, C. M. (1998). Real age of acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 515-523.
19. FARAH, M. J., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 339-357.
20. FARAH, M. J., MCMULLEN, P. A., & MEYER, M. M. (1991). Can recognition of living things be selectively impaired? Neuropsychologia, 29, 185-193.
21. FARAH, M. J., & WALLACE, M. A. (1992). Semantically-bound anomia: Implications for the neural implementation of naming. Neuropsychologia, 30, 609-621.
22. FORDE, E. M. E., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (EDS.) (2002). Category specificity in brain and mind. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
23. FUNNELL, E., & SHERIDAN, J. (1992). Categories of knowledge? Unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 135-153.
24. GARRARD, P., LAMBON RALPH, M. A., HODGES, J. R., & PATTERSON, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 125-174.
25. GAUTHIER, I., JAMES, T. W., CURBY, K. M., & TARR, M. J. (2003). The influence of conceptual knowledge on visual discrimination. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 507-523.
26. GERLACH, C. (2001). Structural similarity causes different category-effects depending on task characteristics. Neuropsychologia, 39, 895-900.
27. GHYSELINCK, M., CUSTERS, R., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2004). The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: Further evidence for the semantic hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 550-554.
28. GILHOOLY, K. J. (1984). Word age-of-acquisition and residence time in lexical memory as factors in word naming. Current Psychological Research & Reviews, 3, 24-31.
29. GILHOOLY, K. J., & LOGIE, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 395-427.
30. GLASER, W. R. (1992). Picture naming. Cognition, 42, 61-105.
31. GONNERMAN, L. M., ANDERSEN, E. S., DEVLIN, J. T., KEMPLER, D., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1997). Double dissociation of semantic categories in Alzheimer's disease. Brain & Language, 57, 254-279.
32. GORDON, B. (1997). Models of naming. In H. Goodglass & A. Wingfield (Eds.), Anomia: Neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates (pp. 31-64). San Diego: Academic Press.
33. HART, J., BERNDT, R. S., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1985). Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction. Nature, 316, 439-440.
34. HAYWARD, W. G., TARR, M. J., & CORDEROY, A. K. (1999). Recognizing silhouettes and shaded images across depth rotation. Perception, 28, 1197-1215.
35. HILLIS, A. E., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114, 2081-2094.
36. HOWELL, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods in psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
37. HUMMEL, J., & BIEDERMAN, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
38. HUMMEL, J., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
39. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & FORDE, E. M. E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioural & Brain Sciences, 24, 453-476.
40. HUMPHREYS, G. W., LAMOTE, C., & LLOYD-JONES, T. J. (1995). An interactive activation approach to object processing: Effects of structural similarity, name frequency and task in normality and pathology. Memory, 3, 535-586.
41. HUMPHREYS, G. W., RIDDOCH, M. J., & FORDE, E. M. E. (2001). The principle of target-competitor differentiation in object recognition and naming (and its role in category effects in normality and pathology). In E. M. E. Forde & G. W Humphreys (Eds.), Category specificity in brain and mind (pp. 51-78). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
42. HUMPHREYS, G. W., RIDDOCH, M. J., & QUINLAN, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-103.
43. IZURA, C., & ELLIS, A. W. (2004). Age of acquisition effects in translation judgment tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 165-181.
44. JOHNSON, C. J., PAIVIO, A., & CLARK, J. M. (1996). Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 113-139.
45. KELLO, C. T. (2003). The emergence of a double dissociation in the modulation of a single control parameter in a nonlinear dynamical system. Cortex, 39, 132-134.
46. KELLO, C. T. (2004). Control over the time course of cognition in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 942-955.
47. KELLO, C. T., & PLAUT, D. C. (2000). Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 719-750.
48. KELLO, C. T., & PLAUT, D. C. (2003). Strategic control over rate of processing in word reading: A computational investigation. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 207-232.
49. LAIACONA, M., & CAPITANI, E. (2001). A case of prevailing deficit of nonliving categories or a case of prevailing sparing of living categories? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 37-90.
50. LAMBON RALPH, M. A., HOWARD, D., NIGHTINGALE, G., & ELLIS, A. W. (1998). Are living and non-living category-specific deficits causally linked to impaired perceptual or associative knowledge? Evidence from a category-specific double dissociation. NeuroCase, 4, 311-338.
51. LAWS, K. R., & GALE, T. M. (2002). Category-specific naming and the 'visual' characteristics of line drawn stimuli. Cortex, 38, 7-21.
52. LAWS, K. R., & NEVE, C. (1999). A 'normal' category-specific advantage for naming living things. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1263-1269.
53. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. LEVELT, W. J. M., ROELOFS, A., & MEYER, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioural & Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
55. LLOYD-JONES, T. J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997a). Categorizing chairs and naming pears: Category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming. Memory & Cognition, 25, 606-624.
56. LLOYD-JONES, T. J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997b). Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory & Cognition, 25, 18-35.
57. LLOYD-JONES, T. J., & LUCKHURST, L. (2002a). Effects of plane rotation, task, and visual complexity on recognition of familiar and chimeric objects. Memory & Cognition, 30, 499-510.
58. LLOYD-JONES, T. J., & LUCKHURST, L. (2002b). Outline shape is a mediator of object recognition that is particularly important for living things. Memory & Cognition, 30, 489-498.
59. LONG, G. M., & WURST, S. A. (1984). Complexity effects on RT measures of visual persistence: Evidence for peripheral and central contributions. American Journal of Psychology, 97, 537-561.
60. LORCH, R. F., & MYERS, J. L. (1990). Regression analysis of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149-157.
61. MARCEL, A. J., & PATTERSON, K. E. (1978). Word recognition and production: Reciprocity in clinical and normal studies. In J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and performance VII (pp. 209-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. MARTIN, A., & CARAMAZZA, A. (2003). Neuropsychological and neuroimaging perspectives on conceptual knowledge: An introduction. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 195-212.
63. MCKENNA, P., & WARRINGTON, E. K. (1978). Category-specific naming preservation: A single case study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 41, 571-574.
64. MCRAE, K., & CREE, G. S. (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic impairments. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category specificity in brain and mind (pp. 211-251). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
65. MCRAE, K., CREE, G. S., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MCNORGAN, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 547-559.
66. MOORE, V., SMITH-SPARK, J. H., & VALENTINE, T. (2004). The effects of age of acquisition on object perception. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 417-439.
67. MORRISON, C. M. (2003). Interpret with caution: Multicollinearity in multiple regression of cognitive data. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 97, 80-82.
68. MORRISON, C. M., ELLIS, A. W., & QUINLAN, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 705-714.
69. NICKELS, L. (1995). Getting it right? Using aphasic naming errors to evaluate theoretical models of spoken word production. Language & Cognitive Processes, 10, 13-45.
70. NICKELS, L. (1997). Spoken word production and its breakdown in aphasia. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
71. NICKELS, L., & HOWARD, D. (1994). A frequent occurrence? Variables affecting the production of semantic errors in aphasic naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 289-320.
72. PLAUT, D. C. (1995). Double dissociation without modularity: Evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 291-321.
73. PLAUT, D. C. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12, 765-805.
74. PLAUT, D. C., & SHALLICE, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
75. ROSCH, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
76. SAFFRAN, E. J., & SCHWARTZ, M. F. (1994). Of cabbages and things: Semantic memory from a neuropsychological point of view - a tutorial review. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 507-536). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
77. SAMSON, D., & PILLON, A. (2003). A case of impaired knowledge for fruit and vegetables. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 373-401.
78. SARTORI, G., JOB, R., & COLTHEART, M. (1993). The organization of object knowledge: Evidence from neuropsychology. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 451-465). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. SCHRIEFERS, H., MEYER, A. S., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture - word interference studies. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 86-102.
80. SHALLICE, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. SIBLEY, D. E., & KELLO, C. T. (2005). A computational exploration of double dissociations: Modes of processing instead of components of processing. Cognitive Systems Research, 6, 61-69.
82. SILVERI, M. G., & GAINOTTI, G. (1988). Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 677-709.
83. SNODGRASS, J. G., & MCCULLOUGH, B. (1986). The role of visual similarity in picture categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 147-154.
84. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). Standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms of name agreement, usage agreement, word familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
85. SNODGRASS, J. G., & YUDITSKY, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 516-536.
86. STRAIN, E., PATTERSON, K., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1140-1154.
87. TABACHNICK, B. G., & FIDELL, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
88. TOOTHAKER, L. E. (1993). Multiple comparison procedures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
89. TRANEL, D., LOGAN, C. G., FRANK, R. J., & DAMASIO, A. R. (1997). Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: Operationalization and analysis of factors. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1329-1339.
90. TYLER, L. K., & MOSS, H. E. (2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 244-252.
91. VAN HELL, J. G., & DE GROOT, A. M. B. (1998). Disentangling context availability and concreteness in lexical decision and word translation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 41-63.
92. VERNON, D., & LLOYD-JONES, T. J. (2003). The role of colour in implicit and explicit memory performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5, 779-803.
93. VITKOVITCH, M., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1991). Perseverant responding in speeded picture naming: It's in the links. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 17, 664-680.
94. VITKOVITCH, M., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & LLOYD-JONES, T. J. (1993). On naming a giraffe a zebra: Picture naming errors across different object categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 19, 243-259.
95. VITKOVITCH, M., & TYRRELL, L. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 822-848.
96. WARRINGTON, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 635-657.
97. WARRINGTON, E. K., & SHALLICE, T. (1984). Category-specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-854.
98. ZEVIN, J. D., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 1-29.