A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 590-603

  Layton, Danielle M ^a   Clarke, Michael ^b   Walton, Terry R ^a,c  

^a Queens University ^*  (Australia)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL VENEER; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; REVIEW;

DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL VENEERS; HUMANS;

EID: 84872040769     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Burke F, Lucarotti P. Ten-year outcome of porcelain laminate veneers placed within the general dental service in England and Wales. J Dent 2009;37: 31-38.
2. Lucarotti P, Holder R, Burke F. Analysis of an administrative database of half a million restorations over 11 years. J Dent 2005; 33: 791-803.
3. Layton D, Walton TR. An up to 16-year prospective study of 304 porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont 2007;22: 389-396.
4. Dumfahrt H, Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II-Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13: 9-18.
5. Shaini FJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneer. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24: 553-559.
6. Kreulen CM, Creugers NH, Meijering AC. Meta-analysis of anterior veneer restorations in clinical studies. J Dent 1998;26: 345-353.
7. Friedman M. A bittersweet silver anniversary for the bonded porcelain veneer restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009;21: 1-3.
8. Horsley T, Dingwall O, Sampson M. Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(8): MR000026.
9. Layton D, Walton T. An up-to 16-year prospective study of 304 porcelain veneers [abstract]. Presented at the 12th Biennial Meeting of the International College of Prosthodontists, Fukuoka, Japan, Sept 2007.
10. Walls AW. The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during the management of fractured and worn anterior teeth: Part 2. Clinical results after 5 years of follow-up. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 337-340.
11. Magne P, Perroud R, Hodges J, Belser U. Clinical performance of novel-design porcelain veneers for the recovery of coronal volume and length. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20: 440-457.
12. Dunne S, Millar B. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Br Dent J 1993;175: 317-321.
13. Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure-A clinician’s observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19: 625-628.
14. Murphy E, Ziada H, Allen P. Retrospective study on the performance of porcelain laminate veneers delivered by undergraduate dental students. Eur J Prosthodont Restorative Dent 2005;13: 38-43.
15. Aristidis G, Dimitra B. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain liminate veneers. Quintessence Int 2002;33: 185-189.
16. Layton DM, Walton TR. The up to 21-year clinical outcome and survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers: Accounting for clustering. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25: 604-612.
17. Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent 2004;6: 65-76.
18. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int 1998;29: 211-221.
19. Smales R, Etemadi S. Long-term survival of porcelain laminate veneers using two preparation designs: A retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17: 323-326.
20. Dumfahrt H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part I-Clinical procedure. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12: 505-513.
21. Walton TR. The outcome of implant-supported fixed prostheses from the prosthodontic perspective: Proposal for a classification protocol. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11: 595-601.
22. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53: 457-481.
23. Thompson S, Pocock S. Can meta-analysis be trusted? Lancet 1991;338: 1127-1130.
24. Galbraith R. A note on the graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat Med 1988; 7: 889-894.
25. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: A review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28: 163-177.
26. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995;26: 95-110.
27. Agosta C, Estafan D. Eliminating microleakage from the composite resin system. Gen Dent 2003;51: 506-509.
28. De Luis IG, Garrido MA, Rio TG, Ceballos L, Radrigeuz J. Comparison of the mechanical properties of dentin and enamel determined by different nanoindentation techniques: Conventional method and continuous stiffness measurement. Bol Soc Esp Ceram 2010;49: 177-182.
29. Pjetursson BE, Bragger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;3: 97-113.
30. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;3: 73-85.
31. Hermann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Karlsson S. Impact of implant interdependency when evaluating success rates: A statistical analysis of multicenter results. Int J Prosthdont 1999;12: 160-166.
32. Moscati R, Jehle D, Ellis D, Fiorello A, Landi M. Positiveoutcome bias: Comparison of emergency medicine and general medicine literatures. Acad Emerg Med 1994;1: 267-271.