The Outcome of Implant- Supported Fixed Prostheses from the Prosthodontic Perspective: Proposal for a Classification Protocol

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 595-601

  Walton, Terry R ^a,b,c  

^a Dulwich   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DENTURE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARD; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);

EID: 0032197981     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
2. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long- term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac. Implants 1986;1:11-25.
3. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:567-572.
4. Albrektsson T, Zarb CA. Current interpretations of the os- seointegrated response: Clinical significance. Int J Prostho- dont 1993;6:95-105.
5. Lang NP, Karring T (eds). Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Periodontology. Chicago: Quintessence, 1994:366-367.
6. Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Gröndahl K, Albrektsson T. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success. A 5-year retrospective analysis of the Brånemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:504-514.
7. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark P-I, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359.
8. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto Study. Part 3: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-194.
9. Gunne J, Jemt T, Linden B. Implant treatment in partially edentulous patients: A report on prostheses after 3 years. Int J Prosthodont 1994,7:143-148.
10. Creugers NH, Kayser AF, van't Hof MA. A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;220:448-452.
11. Walton TR. A ten-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: 1. Protocol and Patient Profile. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:325-331.
12. Walton IN, MacEntee MI. Problems with prostheses on implants: A retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:283-288.
13. Walton JN, MacEntee MI. A prospective study on the maintenance of implant prostheses in private practice. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:453-458.
14. Parein AM, Eckert SE, Wollan PC, Keller EE. Implant reconstruction in the posterior mandible: A long-term retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:34-42.
15. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla - A five year follow-up report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:142-147.
16. Gunne J, Nyström E, Kahnberg KE. Bone grafts and implants in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla. A 3-year follow-up of the prosthetic restoration. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:38-45.
17. Newman MC, McGuire MK. Patient care based on the best available evidence [editorial]. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1997;15:113.