Plastic compressed collagen constructs for ocular cell culture and transplantation: A new and improved technique of confined fluid loss

Current Eye Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 41-52

  Levis, Hannah J ^a   Menzel Severing, Johannes ^a   Drake, Rosemary A L ^b   Daniels, Julie T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SARTORIUS STEDIM BIOTECH GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomimetic material; Collagen; Cornea; GMP; Limbal epithelial cells; Plastic compression

Indexed keywords

BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL; COLLAGEN CONSTRUCT; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; PLASTIC; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ASSAY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SUBPOPULATION; CELL VIABILITY; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; EPITHELIUM CELL; FIBROBLAST CULTURE; FLUID FLOW; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; LIMBAL EPITHELIAL CELL; MICROSCOPE IMAGE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLASTIC COMPRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCALE UP; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CADAVER; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; COLLAGEN; CORNEAL DISEASES; CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; HUMANS; LIMBUS CORNEAE; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; STEM CELLS; TISSUE THERAPY;

EID: 84872029259     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: 14602202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2012.725799     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tseng SC. Regulation and clinical implications of corneal epithelial stem cells. Mol Biol Rep 1996;23:47-58
2. Kenyon KR, Tseng SC. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 1989;96:709-22; discussion 722
3. Schwab IR, Reyes M, Isseroff RR. Successful transplantation of bioengineered tissue replacements in patients with ocular surface disease. Cornea 2000;19:421-426
4. Tsai RJ, Li LM, Chen JK. Reconstruction of damaged corneas by transplantation of autologous limbal epithelial cells. N Engl J Med 2000;343:86-93
5. Shortt AJ, Secker GA, Lomas RJ, Wilshaw SP, Kearney JN, Tuft SJ et al. The effect of amniotic membrane preparation method on its ability to serve as a substrate for the ex-vivo expansion of limbal epithelial cells. Biomaterials 2009;30:1056-1065
6. Levis H, Daniels JT. New technologies in limbal epithelial stem cell transplantation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2009;20:593-597
7. Levis HJ, Brown RA, Daniels JT. Plastic compressed collagen as a biomimetic substrate for human limbal epithelial cell culture. Biomaterials 2010;31:7726-7737
8. D'Amore A, Stella JA, Wagner WR, Sacks MS. Characterization of the complete fiber network topology of planar fibrous tissues and scaffolds. Biomaterials 2010;31:5345-5354
9. Baecker V, Travo P. Cell Image Analyzer- A visual scripting interface for ImageJ and its usage at the microscopy facility Montpellier RIO Imaging Proc of the ImageJ User and Developer Conference. 2006, 105-110
10. Schermer A, Galvin S, Sun TT. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J Cell Biol 1986;103:49-62
11. Yoshida S, Shimmura S, Kawakita T, Miyashita H, Den S, Shimazaki J et al. Cytokeratin 15 can be used to identify the limbal phenotype in normal and diseased ocular surfaces. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4780-4786
12. de Paiva CS, Chen Z, Corrales RM, Pflugfelder SC, Li DQ. ABCG2 transporter identifies a population of clonogenic human limbal epithelial cells. Stem Cells 2005;23:63-73
13. Pellegrini G, Dellambra E, Golisano O, Martinelli E, Fantozzi I, Bondanza S et al. p63 identifies keratinocyte stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:3156-3161
14. Blazejewska EA, Schlötzer-schrehardt U, Zenkel M, Bachmann B, Chankiewitz E, Jacobi C et al. Corneal limbal microenvironment can induce transdifferentiation of hair follicle stem cells into corneal epithelial-like cells. Stem Cells 2009;27:642-652
15. Brown RA, Wiseman M, Chuo C, Cheema U, Nazhat SN. Ultrarapid engineering of biomimetic materials and tissues: Fabrication of nano-And microstructures by plastic compression. Adv Funct Mater 2005;15:1762-1770
16. Yoshita T, Kobayashi A, Takahashi M, Sugiyama K. Reliability of intraocular pressure by Tono-Pen XL over amniotic membrane patch in human. J Glaucoma 2004;13:413-416
17. Connon CJ, Doutch J, Chen B, Hopkinson A, Mehta JS, Nakamura T et al. The variation in transparency of amniotic membrane used in ocular surface regeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:1057-1061
18. Niknejad H, Deihim T, Solati-Hashjin M, Peirovi H. The effects of preservation procedures on amniotic membrane's ability to serve as a substrate for cultivation of endothelial cells. Cryobiology 2011;63:145-151
19. Ijiri S, Kobayashi A, Sugiyama K, Tseng SC. Measurement of light transmittance of cryopreserved human amniotic membrane. Cornea 2006;25:1080-1083
20. Hadjipanayi E, Ananta M, Binkowski M, Streeter I, Lu Z, Cui ZF et al. Mechanisms of structure generation during plastic compression of nanofibrillar collagen hydrogel scaffolds: Towards engineering of collagen. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2011;5:505-519
21. Alekseeva T, Hadjipanayi E, Abou Neel EA, Brown RA. Engineering stable topography in dense bio-mimetic 3D collagen scaffolds. Eur Cell Mater 2012;23:28-40
22. Watt FM, Hogan BL. Out of Eden: Stem cells and their niches. Science 2000;287:1427-1430
23. Breuls RG, Jiya TU, Smit TH. Scaffold stiffness influences cell behavior: Opportunities for skeletal tissue engineering. Open Orthop J 2008;2:103-109
24. Rhee S. Fibroblasts in three dimensional matrices: Cell migration and matrix remodeling. Exp Mol Med 2009;41:858-865