The interplay between risk attitudes and low probability, high cost outcomes in climate policy analysis

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 41, Issue , 2013, Pages 176-184

  Gerst, Michael D ^a   Howarth, Richard B ^b   Borsuk, Mark E ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Decision theory; DICE; Dismal theorem; Economic disaster; Integrated assessment model (IAM)

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; CLIMATE POLICY; CLIMATE SENSITIVITY; DICE; DISMAL THEOREM; DOWNSIDE RISKS; ECONOMIC DAMAGES; GLOBAL CLIMATE MODEL; GLOBAL INVESTMENTS; HIGH COSTS; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELS; LOW LEVEL; LOW PROBABILITY; RISK ATTITUDE; RISK AVERSION; RISK EXPOSURE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; COSTS; DECISION THEORY; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; SPECIFICATIONS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

CLIMATE MODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INVESTMENT; RISK FACTOR; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84872025493     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ackerman F., DeCanio S.J., Howarth R.B., Sheeran K. Limitations of integrated assessment models of climate change. Climatic Change 2009, 95(3-4):297-315.
2. Ahmed A., Vargas-Hill R., Smith L., Wiesmann D., Frankenberger T. The World's Most Deprived: Characteristics and Causes of Extreme Poverty and Hunger 2007, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
3. Anthoff D., Tol R., Yohe G. Risk aversion, time preference, and the social cost of carbon. Environmental Research Letters 2009, 4:1-7.
4. Arrow K. A note on uncertainty and discounting in models of economic growth. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2009, 38:87-94.
5. Atkinson G., Dietz S., Helgeson J., Hepburn C., Sælen H. Siblings, not triplets: social preferences for risk, inequality and time in discounting climate change. Economics: The Open-access, Open-assessment E-Journal 2009, 3. 2009/2026.
6. Azar C., Sterner T. Discounting and distributional considerations in the context of global warming. Ecological Economics 1996, 19(2):169-184.
7. Barro R.J. Rare disasters and asset markets in the twentieth century. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2006, 121:823-866.
8. Barro R.J., Jin T. On the size distribution of macroeconomic disasters. Econometrica 2011, 79(5):1567-1589.
9. Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth 2003, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
10. Barsky R., Juster F., Kimball M., Shapiro M. Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1997, 112(2):537-579.
11. Borsuk M.E., Tomassini L. Uncertainty, imprecision, and the precautionary principle in climate change assessment. Water Science & Technology 2005, 52(6):213-225.
12. Cheve M., Congar R. Managing environmental risks under scientific uncertainty and controversy. International Conference on Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and Resource Economics 2002, Wageningen, Netherlands. E. van Ierland, H. Weikard, J. Wesseler (Eds.).
13. Costello C., Neubert M., Polasky S., Solow A. Bounding uncertainty and climate change economics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107(18):8108-8110.
14. Ding P., Gerst M., Bernstein A., Howarth R.B., Borsuk M.E. Rare disasters and risk attitudes: international differences and implications for integrated assessment modeling. Risk Analysis 2012, 32(11):1846-1855.
15. Epstein L., Zin S. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: a theoretical framework. Econometrica 1989, 57(4):937-969.
16. Galor O., Weil D. Population, technology, and growth: from Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review 2000, 90:806-828.
17. Gerst M., Howarth R., Borsuk M.E. Accounting for the risk of extreme outcomes in an integrated assessment of climate change. Energy Policy 2010, 38:4540-4548.
18. Gerst M.D., Wang P., Borsuk M.E. Discovering plausible energy and economic futures under global change using multidimensional scenario discovery. Environmental Modelling & Software 2012, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.001.
19. Gerst M.D., Wang P., Roventini A., Fagiolo G., Dosi G., Howarth R.B., Borsuk M.E. Agent-based modeling of climate policy: an introduction to the ENGAGE multi-level model framework. Environmental Modelling & Software 2012, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.002.
20. Geweke J. A note on some limitations of CRRA utility. Economics Letters 2001, 71(3):341-345.
21. Hardaker J.B., Fleming E., Lien G. How should governments make risky policy decisions?. Australian Journal of Public Administration 2009, 68(3):256-271.
22. Harris G. Integrated assessment and modelling: an essential way of doing science. Environmental Modelling & Software 2002, 17:201-207.
23. 2 from PAGE2002: an integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC's five reasons for concern. Integrated Assessment Journal 2006, 6(1):19-56.
24. Howarth R.B. Catastrophic outcomes in the economics of climate change. Climatic Change 2003, 56(3):257-263.
25. Jaeger C.C. Risk management and integrated assessment. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 1998, 3(4):211-225.
26. Katz R.W., Brown B.G. Extreme events in a changing climate: variability is more important than averages. Climatic Change 1992, 21(3):289-302.
27. Kaufman N. The bias of integrated assessment models that ignore climate catastrophes. Climatic Change 2011, 10.1007/s10584-10140-10587.
28. Kolstad C.D. Learning and stock effects in environmental regulation: the case of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1996, 31(1):1-18.
29. Kriegler E., Hall J., Held H., Dawson R., Schellnbuber H. Imprecise probability assessment of tipping points in the climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106(13):5041-5046.
30. Lucas R. Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica 1978, 46:1429-1445.
31. Manne A.S. The rate of time preference: implications for the greenhouse debate. Energy Policy 1995, 23(4-5):391-394.
32. Manne A.S., Mendelsohn R., Richels R.G. A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 1995, 23:17-34.
33. Mehra R., Prescott E. The equity premium: a puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics 1985, 15:145-161.
34. Newbold S., Daigneault A. Climate response uncertainty and the benefits of greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Environmental and Resource Economics 2009, 44:351-377.
35. Nordhaus W.D. To slow or not to slow: the economics of the greenhouse effect. Economic Journal 1991, 101:920-937.
36. Nordhaus W.D. A review of the " Stern review on the economics of climate change" Journal of Economic Literature 2007, 45:686-702.
37. Nordhaus W.D. A Question of Balance: Weighting the Options on Global Warming Policies 2008, Yale University Press, New Haven.
38. Nordhaus W.D. The economics of tail events with an application to climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2011, 5(2):240-257.
39. Parker P., Letcher R., Jakeman A., et al. Progress in integrated assessment and modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software 2002, 17:209-217.
40. Petschel-Held G., Schellnhuber H.J., Bruckner T., Toth F.L., Hasselmann K. The tolerable windows approach: theoretical and methodological foundations. Climatic Change 1999, 41(3-4):303-331.
41. Pindyck R.S. Fat tails, thin tails, and climate change policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2011, 5(2):258-274.
42. Ramsey F.P. A mathematical theory of saving. The Economic Journal 1928, 38:543-559.
43. Rinderknecht S., Borsuk M.E., Reichert P. Bridging uncertain and ambiguous knowledge with imprecise probabilities. Environmental Modelling & Software 2012, 36:122-130.
44. Roe G.H., Baker M. Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable?. Science 2007, 318(5850):629-632.
45. Romer D. Advanced Macroeconomics 2005, McGraw-Hill, New York.
46. Roughgarden T., Schneider S.H. Climate change policy: quantifying uncertainties for damages and optimal carbon taxes. Energy Policy 1999, 27:415-429.
47. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: the Stern Review 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
48. Sumaila U.R., Walters C. Intergenerational discounting: a new intuitive approach. Ecological Economics 2005, 52(2):135-142.
49. Tol R. Is the uncertainty about climate change too large for expected cost-benefit analysis?. Climatic Change 2003, 56:265-289.
50. Tomassini L., Reichert P., Knutti R., Stocker T.F., Borsuk M.E. Robust Bayesian uncertainty analysis of climate system properties using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Journal of Climate 2007, 20:1239-1254.
51. von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 1944, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
52. Webster M. Incorporating path dependency into decision-analytic methods: an application to global climate-change policy. Decision Analysis 2008, 5:60-75.
53. Weitzman M.L. On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics 2009, 91(1):1-19.
54. Weitzman M.L. Fat-tailed uncertainty in the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2011, 5(2):275-292.
55. Woodward R.T., Bishop R.C. How to decide when experts disagree: uncertainty-based choice rules in environmental policy. Land Economics 1997, 73:492-507.
56. Zickfeld K., Morgan M.G., Frame D.J., Keith D.W. Expert judgements about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107(28):12451-12456.
57. Zimmerman F., Carter M. Asset smoothing, consumption smoothing, and the reproduction of inequality under risk and subsistence constraints. Journal of Development Economics 2003, 71:233-260.