Uncertainty, imprecision, and the precautionary principle in climate change assessment

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 213-225

  Borsuk, Mark E ^a   Tomassini, Lorenzo ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Climate change; Cost benefit analysis; Decision theory; Imprecise probability; Precautionary principle; Upper and lower probabilities

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATOLOGY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION THEORY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GAS EMISSIONS; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL METHODS; WEATHER FORECASTING;

CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS LEVELS; CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT; IMPRECISE PROBABILITY; LOWER PROBABILITIES; PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE; UPPER PROBABILITIES;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION ANALYSIS; PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ACCURACY; AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION THEORY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 28244466260     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0170     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrenova, N. and Schlesinger, M. (2001). Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106(D19), 22605-22611.
2. Basu, S. and DasGupta, A. (1995). Robust Bayesian analysis with distribution bands. Statistics & Decisions, 13(4), 333-349.
3. Berger, J. (1984). The robust Bayesian viewpoint (with discussion). In Robustness of Bayesian Analysis, Kadane, J, (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 63-124.
4. CEU (2000). Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. COM(2000)-1, Commission of the European Union.
5. Cheve, M. and Cougar, R. (2002). Managing environmental risks under scientific uncertainty and controversy. In International Conference on Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and Resource Economics, van Ierland, E.C., Weikard, H.P. and Wesseler, J. (eds), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
6. DeRobertis, L. and Hartigan, J. (1981). Bayesian inference using intervals of measures. The Annals of Statistics, 9(2), 235-244.
7. Forest, C., Stone, P., Sokolov, A., Allen, M. and Webster, M. (2002). Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science, 295(5552), 113-117.
8. IPCC (2001). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Third Assessment Report of Working Group I: The Science of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Kann, A. and Weyant, J. (2000). Approaches for performing uncertainty analysis in large-scale energy/economic policy models. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 5(1), 29-46.
10. Katz, R. (2002). Techniques for estimating uncertainty in climate change scenarios and impact studies. Climate Research, 20(2), 167-185.
11. Keith, D. (1996). When is it appropriate to combine expert judgments? Climatic Change, 33(2), 139-144.
12. Kriegler, E. and Held, H. (2003). Climate projections for the 21st century using random sets. In Third International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, Bernard, J.M., Seidenfeld, T. and Zaffalon, M. (eds), Carleton Scientific, Lugano, Switzerland, pp. 345-360.
13. Lavine, M. (1991). An approach to robust Bayesian analysis for multidimensional parameter spaces. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86(414), 400-403.
14. Maddison, D. (1995). A cost-benefit analysis of slowing climate change. Energy Policy, 23(4-5), 337-346.
15. Morgan, M. and Keith, D. (1995). Subjective judgments by climate experts. Environmental Science & Technology, 29(10), A468-A479.
16. New, M. and Hulme, M. (2000). Representing uncertainty in climate change scenarios: a Monte-Carlo approach. Integrated Assessment, 1(3), 203-213.
17. Pittock, A., Jones, R. and Mitchell, C. (2001). Probabilities will help us plan for climate change. Nature, 413(6853), 249.
18. Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R. (1968). Applied Statistical Decision Theory, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
19. Reckhow, K. (1994). Importance of scientific uncertainty in decision-making. Environmental Management, 18(2), 161-166.
20. Reichert, P. (1997). On the necessity of using imprecise probabilities for modelling environmental systems. Water Science and Technology, 36(5), 149-156.
21. Reichert, P. and Borsuk, M. (2005). Does high forecast uncertainty preclude effective decision support? Environmental Modelling & Software, 20, 991-1001.
22. Tol, R. (2003). Is the uncertainty about climate change too large for expected cost-benefit analysis? Climatic Change, 56(3), 265-289.
23. Wasserman, L. and Kadane, J. (1992). Computing bounds on expectations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(418), 516-522.
24. Webster, M., Forest, C., Reilly, J., Babiker, M., Kicklighter, D., Mayer, M., Prinn, R., Sarofilm, M., Sokolov, A., Stone, P. and Wang, C. (2003). Uncertainty analysis of climate change and policy response. Climatic Change, 61(3), 295-320.
25. Webster, M. and Sokolov, A. (2000). A methodology for quantifying uncertainty in climate projections. Climatic Change, 46(4), 417-446.