Predicting live birth chances for women with multiple consecutive failing IVF cycles: A simple and accurate prediction for routine medical practice

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Porcu, Géraldine ^a   Lehert, Philippe ^b,c   Colella, Carolina ^d   Giorgetti, Claude ^a  

^a Institut de Médecine de la Reproduction   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d Merck KGaA France   (France)

Author keywords

ICSI; IVF; Predictive model

Indexed keywords

CETRORELIX; CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; FOLLITROPIN; GANIRELIX; PROGESTERONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO (ANATOMY); FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GESTATIONAL SAC; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LIVE BIRTH; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE INFERTILITY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PREDICTION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; QUALITY CONTROL; TREATMENT FAILURE;

FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLICLE STIMULATING HORMONE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; INFERTILITY, MALE; LIVE BIRTH; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; PREGNANCY; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84872024096     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777827     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Habbema JDF, Collins J, Leridon H, Evers JLH, Lunenfeld B, Te Velde ER. Towards less confusing terminology in reproductive medicine: a proposal. Hum Reprod 2004, 19:1497-1501. 10.1093/humrep/deh303, 15220305.
2. Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD, Hompes PG, Broekmans FJ, Van Dessel HJ, Bossuyt PM, Van der Veen F, Mol BWJ. Pregnancy is predictable: a large-scale prospective external validation of the prediction of spontaneous pregnancy in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod 2007, 22:536-342.
3. Lintsen AME, Braat DDM, Habbema JDF, Kremer JAM, Eijkemans MJC. Can differences in IVF success rates between centers be explained by patient characteristics and sample size?. Hum Reprod 2010, 25:110-117. 10.1093/humrep/dep358, 19837684.
4. Leushuis E, Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Bossuyt PM, Eijkemans MJ, Van der Veen F, Mol BW, Hompes PG. Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 2009, 15:537-552. 10.1093/humupd/dmp013, 19435779.
5. Templeton A, Morris JK, Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet 1996, 348:1402-1406. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05291-9, 8937279.
6. Hunault CC, Eijkemans MJ, Pieters MH, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2002, 77:725-732. 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03243-5, 11937124.
7. Steures P, van der Steeg JW, Mol BW, Eijkemans MJ, van der Veen F, Habbema JD, Hompes PG, Bossuyt PM, Verhoeve HR, van Kasteren YM, et al. Prediction of an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2004, 82:45-51. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.12.028, 15236988.
8. Smeenk JM, Stolwijk AM, Kremer JA, Braat DD. External validation of the Templeton model for predicting success after IVF. Hum Reprod 2000, 15:1065-1068. 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1065, 10783353.
9. Van Loendersloot LL, Van Wely M, Repping S, Van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM. Templeton prediction model underestimates IVF success in an external validation. Reprod Biomed Online 2011, 22:597-602. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.02.012, 21493154.
10. Arvis P, Lehert P, Guivarc'h-Leveque A. Simple adaptations to the Templeton model for IVF outcome prediction make it current and clinically useful. Hum Reprod 2012, : . First published online: July 31, 2012.
11. Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach JL, Salzmann J, Roulier R. Embryo score to predict implantation after in vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 1995, 10:2427-2431.
12. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE, Borsboom GJ, Eijkemans MJ, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JD. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001, 54:774-781. 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00341-9, 11470385.
13. Hirji KF, Mehta CR, Patel NR. Computing distributions for exact logistic regression. JASA 1987, 82:1110-1117.
14. Hosmer DW. Applied Logistic Regression 2000, Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
15. Nelson SM, Lawlor DA. Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from in vitro fertilisation: a prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles. PLoS Med 2011, 8:e1000386. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000386, 3014925, 21245905.
16. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BCJM, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE consensus on the definition of " poor response" to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011, 26:1616-1624. 10.1093/humrep/der092, 21505041.
17. Leridon H. Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the material decline in fertility with age. Hum Reprod 2004, 19:1548-1453. 10.1093/humrep/deh304, 15205397.
18. Nanassy L, Carrel DT. Paternal effects on early embryogenesis. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod 2008, 5:1-9. 10.1186/1743-1050-5-1, 2365961, 18430233.
19. Cooke S, Tyler JPP, Driscoll GL. Meiotic spindle location and identification and its effect on embryonic cleavage plane and the early development. Hum Reprod 2003, 18:2397-2405. 10.1093/humrep/deg447, 14585893.
20. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988, 240:1285-1293. 10.1126/science.3287615, 3287615.
21. Cai QF, Wan F, Huang R, Zhang HW. Factors predicting the cumulative outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment: a multivariable analysis of 2450 patients. Hum Reprod 2011, 26:2532-2540. 10.1093/humrep/der228, 21771773.
22. Malizia BA, Hacker MR, Penzias AS. Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:236-243. 10.1056/NEJMoa0803072, 19144939.